">
검색
Article Search

JMB Journal of Microbiolog and Biotechnology

OPEN ACCESS eISSN 0454-8124
pISSN 1225-6951
QR Code

Article

Kyungpook Mathematical Journal 2018; 58(1): 117-135

Published online March 23, 2018

Copyright © Kyungpook Mathematical Journal.

A Characterization of Involutes and Evolutes of a Given Curve in

Günay Öztürk, Kadri Arslan and Betül Bulca*

Department of Mathematics, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli 41380, Turkey, e-mail : ogunay@kocaeli.edu.tr, Department of Mathematics, Uludağ University, Bursa 16059, Turkey, e-mail : arslan@uludag.edu.tr and bbulca@uludag.edu.tr

Received: July 14, 2017; Accepted: February 8, 2018

The orthogonal trajectories of the first tangents of the curve are called the involutes of x. The hyperspheres which have higher order contact with a curve x are known osculating hyperspheres of x. The centers of osculating hyperspheres form a curve which is called generalized evolute of the given curve x in n-dimensional Euclidean space . In the present study, we give a characterization of involute curves of order k (resp. evolute curves) of the given curve x in n-dimensional Euclidean space . Further, we obtain some results on these type of curves in and , respectively.

Keywords: Frenet curve, involutes, evolutes

The notions of evolutes and involutes were studied by C. Huygens in his work [7] and studied in differential geometry and singularity theory of planar curves [1]. The evolute of a regular curve in the Euclidean plane is given by not only the locus of all its centres of the curvature, but also the envelope of normal lines of the regular curve, namely, the locus of singular loci of parallel curves. On the other hand, the involute of a regular curve is to replace the taut string by a line segment that is tangent to the curve on one end, while the other end traces out the involute. In ([3], [4]) T. Fukunaga and M. Takahashi defined the evolutes and the involutes of fronts in the plane without inflection points and gave properties of them. Meanwhile, E. Özyılmaz and S. Yılmaz studied the involute-evolute of W-curves in Euclidean 4-space [13], see also, [16]. Recently, B. Divjak and Ž. M. Šipuš, considered the isotropic involutes (of order k) and the isotropic evolutes in n-dimensional isotropic space In(1) [2, 10].

This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 gives some basic concepts of Frenet curves in Euclidean spaces. Section 3 gives some basic concepts of the involute curves of order k in . Section 4 explains some geometric properties about the involute curves of order k in , where k = 1, 2. Section 5 tells about the involute curves of order k in , where k = 1, 2, 3. Further these sections provides some properties and results of these type of curves. In the final section we consider generalized evolute curves in . Moreover, we present some results of generalized evolute curves in and , respectively.

Let be a regular curve in , (i.e., ||x′(t)|| ≠ 0). Then x is called a Frenet curve of osculating order d, (2 ≤ dn) if x′(t), x″(t), …, x(d)(t) are linearly independent and x′(t), x″(t),…, x(d+1)(t) linearly dependent for all t in I. For the case d = n, the Frenet curve x is called generic curve in [17]. From now on we assume that x is a generic curve in . To each generic curve x one can associates an orthonormal d-frame V1=x(t)x(t), V2, V3 …, Vn along x, the Frenet n-frame, and n − 1 functions κ1, κ2, …, κn−1:I –→ ℝ, the Frenet curvature, such that

[V1V2V3Vn]=v[0κ100-κ10κ200-κ200κn-100-κn-10][V1V2V3Vn]

where, v = ||x′(t)|| is the speed of the curve x. In fact, to obtain V1, V2, V3 …, Vn, it is sufficient to apply the Gram-Schmidt orthonormalization process to x′(t), x″(t), …, x(n)(t). Moreover, the functions κ1, κ2, …, κn−1 are easily obtained as by-product during this calculation.

More precisely, V1, V2, V3 …, Vn and κ1, κ2, …, κn−1 are determined by the following formulas:

E1(t):=x(t),Eα(t):=x(α)(t)-i=1α-1<x(α)(t),Ei(t)>Ei(t)Ei(t)2,Vα:=Eα(t)Eα(t),         1αn

and

κδ(t):=Eδ+1(t)Eδ(t)E1(t),

respectively, where δ ∈ {1, 2, 3, …, n − 1} (see, [5]).

The osculating hyperplane of a generic curve x at t is the subspace generated by {V1, V2, V3 …, Vn} that passes through x(t). The unit vector Vn(t) is called binormal vector of x at t. The normal hyperplane of x at t is defined to be the one generated by {V2, V3 …, Vn} passing through x(t) [14].

A Frenet curve of rank d for which the first Frenet curvature κ1 is constant is called a Salkowski curve [15] (or T.C-curve [8]). Further, a Frenet curve for which κ1, κ2, …, κn−1 are constant is called (circular ) helix or W-curve [9]. Meanwhile, a Frenet curve with constant curvature ratios κ2κ1,κ3κ2,κ4κ3,,κn-1κn-2 is called a ccr-curve (see, [12], [11]). A ccr-curve in is known as generalized helix.

Given a generic curve x in , the Frenet 4-frame, V1, V2, V3, V4 and the Frenet curvatures κ1, κ2, κ3 are given by

V1(t)=x(t)x(t)V4(t)=x(t)x(t)x(t)x(t)x(t)x(t)V3(t)=V4(t)x(t)x(t)V4(t)x(t)x(t)V2(t)=V3(t)V4(t)x(t)V3(t)V4(t)x(t)

and

κ1(t)=V2(t),x(t)x(t)2,   κ2(t)=V3(t),x(t)x(t)3κ1(t),κ3(t)=V4(t),x(t)x(t)4κ1(t)κ2(t).

respectively, where ∧ is the exterior product in [5].

Definition 3.1

Let x = x(s) be a regular generic curve in given with the arclength parameter s (i.e., ||x′(s)|| = 1). Then the curves which are orthogonal to the system of k-dimensional osculating hyperplanes of x, are called the involutes of order k [2] (or, kth involute [6]) of the curve x. For simplicity, we call the involutes of order 1, simply the involutes of the given curve.

In order to find the parametrization of involutes x of order k of the curve x, we put

x¯(s)=x(s)+α=1kλα(s)Vα(s),kn-1

where λα is a differentiable function and s is the parameter of χ̄ which is not necessarily an arclength parameter. The differentiation of the equation (3.1) and the Frenet formulae (2.1) are given in the following equation

x¯(s)=(1+λ1-κ1λ2)(s)V1(s)+α=2k-1(λα-λα+1κα+λα-1κα-1)(s)Vα(s)+(λk+λk-1κk-1)(s)Vk(s)+κk(s)λk(s)Vk+1(s).

Furthermore, the involutes χ̄ of order k of the curve x are determined by

x¯(s),Vj(s)=0,         1jk,         kn-1.

This condition is satisfied if and only if

1+λ1-κ1λ2=0,λα-λα+1κα+λα-1κα-1=0,λk+λk-1κk-1=0,

where 2 ≤ αn − 1 [2].

In the sequel we characterize the involutes of generic curves in and .

In the present section we consider involutes of order 1 and of order 2 of curves in Euclidean 3-space , respectively.

4.1. Involutes of Order 1 in

Proposition 4.1.1

Let x = x(s) be a regular curve ingiven with nonzero Frenet curvatures κ1and κ2. Then Frenet curvatures κ̄1and κ̄2of the involute χ̄ of the curve x are given by

κ¯1=κ12+κ22κ1s-c,         κ¯2=(κ2κ1)κ12(κ12+κ22)(c-s).
Proof

Let χ̄ = χ̄(s) be the involute of the curve x in . Then by the use of (3.2) with (3.3) we get 1+λ1(s)=0, and furthermore λ(s) = (cs) for some integral constant c. So, we get the following parametrization

x¯(s)=x(s)+(c-s)V1(s).

Further, the differentiation of (4.2) implies that

x¯(s)=ϕV2,         ϕ(s):=λ(s)κ1(s)x¯(s)=-ϕκ1V1+ϕV2+ϕκ2V3,x¯(s)=-{(κ1ϕ)+κ1ϕ}V1+{ϕ-κ12ϕ-κ22ϕ}V2+{(κ2ϕ)+κ2ϕ}V3.

Now, an easy calculation gives

x¯(s)=ϕ=(c-s)κ1,x¯(s)×x¯(s)=ϕ2κ12+κ22,x¯(s)×x¯(s),x¯(s)=ϕ3(κ1κ2-κ2κ1).

The parameter s is not the arclength parameter of χ̄, so, as is shown in [2], we have

κ¯1=x¯(s)×x¯(s)x¯(s)3,         κ¯2=x¯(s)×x¯(s),x¯(s)x¯(s)×x¯(s)2

Hence, from the relations (4.3) and (4.4) we deduce (4.1).

By the use of (4.1) one can get the following result.

Corollary 4.1.2

If x = x(s) is a cylindrical helix in, then the involute χ̄ of x is a planar curve.

An involute of order 2 of a regular curve x in has the parametrization

x¯(s)=x(s)+λ1(s)V1(s)+λ2(s)V2(s)

where V1, V2 are tangent and normal vectors of x in and λ1, λ2 are differentiable functions satisfying

λ1(s)=κ1(s)λ2(s)-1,λ2(s)=-λ1(s)κ1(s).

We obtain the following result.

Proposition 4.2.1

Let x = x(s) be a regular curve inwith nonzero Frenet curvatures κ1and κ2. Then

κ¯1=sgn(κ2)λ2,         κ¯2=κ2κ1λ2

holds, where κ̄1and κ̄2are Frenet curvatures of χ̄.

Proof

Let χ̄ = χ̄(s) be the involute of order 2 of the curve x in . Then by the use of (3.2) with (3.3) we get

x¯(s)=λ2(s)κ2(s)V3(s).

Further, the differentiation of (4.8) implies that

x¯(s)=ψ(s)V3(s),         ψ(s):=λ2(s)κ2(s)x¯(s)=-ψ(s)κ2(s)V2(s)+ψ(s)V3(s),x¯(s)=-ψ(s)κ1(s)κ2(s)V1(s)-{(ψ(s)κ2(s))+κ2(s)ψ(s)}V2(s)+{ψ(s)+ψ(s)κ22(s)}V3(s).

Now, an easy calculation gives

x¯(s)=ψ(s)=λ2(s)κ2(s),x¯(s)×x¯(s)=ψ(s)2κ2(s),x¯(s)×x¯(s),x¯(s)=ψ(s)3κ1(s)κ22(s).

Hence, from the relations (4.4) and (4.9) we deduce (4.7).

Corollary 4.2.2

The involute χ̄ of order 2 of a generalized helix inis also a generalized helix in.

Solving the system of differential equations (4.6) we get the following result.

Corollary 4.2.3

Let x = x(s) be a unit speed Salkowski curve in. Then the involute χ̄ of order 2 of the curve x has the parametrization (4.5) given with the coefficient functions

λ1(s)=c1sin(κ1s)+c2cos(κ1s),λ2(s)=c1cos(κ1s)-c2sin(κ1s)-1κ1.

where c1and c2are real constants.

In the present section we consider involutes of order k, 1 ≤ k ≤ 3 of a given curve x in Euclidean 4-space .

5.1. Involutes of Order 1 in

The following result gives a simple representation of Theorem 1 in [16].

Proposition 5.1.1

Let x = x(s) be a regular curve ingiven with the Frenet curvatures κ1, κ2and κ3. Then Frenet 4-frame, V̄1, 2, 3and V̄4and Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3of the involute χ̄ of the curve x are given by

V¯1(s)=V2V¯2(s)=-κ1V1+κ2V3κ12+κ22,V¯3(s)=-(κ2A-κ1C)κ2V1-(κ2A-κ1C)κ1V3+D(κ12+κ22)V4Wκ12+κ22,V¯4(s)=Dκ2V1+Dκ1V3-(κ2A-κ1C)V4W,

and

κ¯1=κ12+κ22ϕ;         ϕ:=(c-s)κ1,κ¯2=Wϕ2(κ12+κ22),κ¯3=-(κ2A-κ1C)(κ3C+D)+D(κ2A-κ1C)+D2κ1κ3Wϕ4κ¯1κ¯2

respectively, where

A=κ1ϕ+2κ1ϕC=κ2ϕ+2κ2ϕD=κ2κ3ϕ

and

W=D2(κ12+κ22)+(κ1C-κ2A)2=ϕκ22κ32(κ12+κ22)+(κ1κ2-κ2κ1)2.
Proof

As in the proof of Proposition 4.1.1, the involute χ̄ = χ̄(s) of the curve x in has the parametrization

x¯(s)=x(s)+(c-s)V1(s).

where V1 is the unit tangent vector of x.

Further, the differentiation of the position vector χ̄(s) implies that

x¯(s)=ϕV2,x¯(s)=-ϕκ1V1+ϕV2+ϕκ2V3,x¯(s)=-{(κ1ϕ)+κ1ϕ}V1+{ϕ-κ12ϕ-κ22ϕ}V2+{(κ2ϕ)+κ2ϕ}V3+ϕκ2κ3V4,

where ϕ = (cs)κ1 is a differentiable function. Consequently, substituting

A=κ1ϕ+2κ1ϕB=ϕ-κ12ϕ-κ22ϕC=κ2ϕ+2κ2ϕD=ϕκ2κ3,

the last vector becomes

x¯=-AV1+BV2+CV3+DV4.

Furthermore, differentiating χ̄‴ with respect to s, we get

x¯=-{A+κ1B}V1+{-κ1A-κ2C+B}V2+{κ2B-κ3D+C}V3+{D+κ3C}V4.

Now, by the use of (5.4), we can compute the vector χ̄′(s)∧χ̄″(s)∧χ̄‴(s) and second principal normal of χ̄ as the following;

x¯(s)x¯(s)x¯(s)=ϕ2{Dκ2V1+Dκ1V3+(κ1C-κ2A)V4}

and

V¯4(s)=x(s)x(s)x(s)x(s)x(s)x(s)=Dκ2V1+Dκ1V3-(κ2A-κ1C)V4W,

where

W=D2(κ12+κ22)+(κ2A-κ1C)2.

Similarly,

V¯4(s)x¯(s)x¯(s)=ϕ2W{-(κ2A-κ1C)κ2V1-(κ2A-κ1C)κ1V3+D(κ12+κ22)V4}

and

V¯3(s)=V¯4(s)x¯(s)x¯(s)V¯4(s)x¯(s)x¯(s)=-(κ2A-κ1C)κ2V1-(κ2A-κ1C)κ1V3+D(κ12+κ22)V4Wκ12+κ22.

Finally, the vectors 3(s) ∧ 4(s)∧ χ̄′(s) and 2(s) are

V¯3(s)V¯4(s)x¯(s)=ϕ{D2(κ12+κ22)-(κ2A-κ1C)2}(-κ1V1+κ2V3)

and

V¯2(s)=V¯3(s)V¯4(s)x¯(s)V¯3(s)V¯4(s)x¯(s)=-κ1V1+κ2V3κ12+κ22.

Consequently, an easy calculation gives

V¯2(s),x¯(s)=ϕκ12+κ22V¯3(s),x¯(s)=Wκ12+κ22V¯4(s),x¯(s)=-(κ2A-κ1C)(κ3C+D)+D(κ2A-κ1C)+D2κ1κ3W.

Hence, from the relations (5.12) and (4.4) we deduce (5.2). This completes the proof of the proposition.

If x is a W-curve we find the following results.

Corollary 5.1.2

Let χ̄ be an involute of a generic x curve ingiven with the Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3. If x is a W-curve then the Frenet 4-frame, V̄1, 2, 3and V̄4and the Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3of the involute χ̄ of the curve x are given by

V¯1(s)=V2,V¯2(s)=-κ1V1+κ2V3κ12+κ22V¯3(s)=V4V¯4(s)=κ2V1+κ1V3κ12+κ22,

and

κ¯1=κ12+κ22ϕ,κ¯2=κ2κ3ϕκ12+κ22,κ¯3=-κ1κ3ϕκ12+κ22

respectively, where ϕ = (cs)κ1.

Corollary 5.1.3

Let χ̄ be an involute of a generic curve x ingiven with the Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3. If x is a W-curve then χ̄ becomes a ccr-curve.

Proof

Let x be a regular W-curve of . Since the ratios

κ¯2κ¯1=κ2κ3κ12+κ22κ¯3κ¯2=-κ1κ2

are constant functions then the involute curve χ̄ is a ccr-curve.

An involute of order 2 of a regular curve x in has the parametrization

x¯(s)=x(s)+λ1(s)V1(s)+λ2(s)V2(s)

where V1, V2 are tangent and normal vectors of x in and λ1, λ2 are differentiable functions satisfying

λ1(s)=κ1(s)λ2(s)-1,λ2(s)=-λ1(s)κ1(s).

As in the previous subsection we get the following result.

Corollary 5.2.1

Let x = x(s) be a unit speed Salkowski curve in. Then the involute χ̄ of order 2 of the curve x has the parametrization (5.15) given with the coefficient functions

λ1(s)=c1sin(κ1s)+c2cos(κ1s),λ2(s)=c1cos(κ1s)-c2sin(κ1s)-1κ1.

where c1and c2are real constants.

Proof

Assume that x = x(s) is a unit speed Salkowski curve in then κ1(s) is a constant function. So, differentiating first equation of (5.16) and using the second equation we get

λ1(s)=-κ12λ1(s)

which has a solution λ1(s) = c1 sin(κ1s)+c2 cos(κ1s). And substituting this function into the first equation of (5.16) we obtain the second equation of (5.17).

We obtain the following result.

Proposition 5.2.2

Let x = x(s) be a regular curve ingiven with nonzero Frenet curvatures κ1, κ2and κ3. Then Frenet 4-frame, V̄1, 2, 3and V̄4and Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3of the involute χ̄ of order 2 of a regular curve x inare given by

V¯1(s)=V3,V¯2(s)=-κ2V2+κ3V4κ22+κ32,V¯3(s)=K(κ22+κ32)V1+(κ2N-κ3L)κ3V2+(κ2N-κ3L)κ2V4Wκ22+κ32,V¯4(s)=(κ2N-κ3L)V1+κ3KV2+κ2KV4W,

and

κ¯1=κ22+κ32φ;         φ:λ2(s)κ2(s)κ¯2=Wφ2(κ22+κ32),κ¯3=(κ2N-κ3L)(κ1L+K)+(κ2N-κ3L)K+κ1κ3K2Wφ4κ¯1κ¯2

where

K=κ1κ2φL=2κ2φ+κ2φN=2κ3φ+κ3φ

and

W=K2(κ22+κ32)+(κ2N-κ3L)2=φκ12κ22(κ22+κ32)+(κ2κ3-κ3κ2)2.
Proof

Let χ̄ = χ̄(s) be the involute of order 2 of the curve x in . Then by the use of (3.2), we get

x¯(s)=φV3

where φ = λ2(s)κ2(s) is a differentiable function. Further, the differentiation of (5.21) implies that

x¯(s)=-φκ2V2+φV3+φκ3V4,x¯(s)=κ1κ2φV1+{2κ2φ+κ2φ}V2,+{φ-κ22φ-κ32φ}V3+{2κ3φ+κ3φ}V4.

Consequently, substituting

K=κ1κ2φL=2κ2φ+κ2φM=φ-κ22φ-κ32φN=2κ3φ+κ3φ

the last vector becomes

x¯=KV1-LV2+MV3+NV4.

Furthermore, differentiating χ̄‴ with respect to s we get

x¯={K+κ1L}V1+{κ1K-κ2M-L}V2+{M-κ2L-κ3N}V3+{N+κ3M}V4

Hence, substituting (5.21)–(5.25) into (2.4) and (2.5), after some calculations as in the previous proposition, we get the result.

If x is a W-curve then we find the following results.

Corollary 5.2.3

Let χ̄ be an involute of order 2 of a generic curve x ingiven with the Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3. If x is a W-curve then the Frenet 4-frame, V̄1, 2, 3and V̄4and Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3of the involute χ̄ of order 2 of a regular curve x inare given by

V¯1(s)=V3,V¯2(s)=-κ2V2+κ3V4κ22+κ32V¯3(s)=V1V¯4(s)=κ3V2+κ2V4κ22+κ32,

and

κ¯1=κ12+κ22φ,κ¯2=κ1κ2φκ22+κ32,κ¯3=κ1κ3ϕκ22+κ32

where φ(s) = λ2(s)κ2(s).

Corollary 5.2.4

Let χ̄ be an involute of order 2 of a generic curve x ingiven with the Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3. If x is a W-curve then χ̄ becomes a ccr-curve.

Proof

Let x be a regular W-curve of . Since the ratios

κ¯2κ¯1=κ1κ2κ22+κ32κ¯3κ¯2=-κ3κ2

are constant functions then the involute curve χ̄ is a ccr-curve.

An involute of order 3 of a regular curve x in has the parametrization

x¯(s)=x(s)+λ1(s)V1(s)+λ2(s)V2(s)+λ3(s)V3(s)

where

λ1(s)=κ1(s)λ2(s)-1,λ2(s)=λ3κ2-λ1κ1λ3(s)=-λ2(s)κ2(s).

By solving the system of differential equations in (5.29) we get the following result.

Corollary 5.3.1

Let x = x(s) be a unit speed W-curve in. Then the involute χ̄ of order 3 of the curve x has the parametrization (5.28) given with the coefficient functions

λ1(s)=κ1(c1sin(κs)-c2cos(κs))κ-κ22sκ+c3,λ2(s)=c1cos(κs)+c2sin(κs)+κ1κ,λ3(s)=κ2(c2cos(κs)-c1sin(κs))κ-κ1κ2sκ+c4,

whereκ=κ12+κ22, c1, c2, c3and c4are real constants.

Proof

Suppose that x is a unit speed W-curve in then the Frenet curvatures κ1, κ2 and κ3 of x are constant functions. Consequently, if χ̄ is the involute of x which is an order 3 curve then (5.29) holds. Differentiating the second equation of (5.29) and using the others we get λ2(s)=c1cos(κs)+c2sin(κs)+κ1κ. Further, substituting this function into (5.29) we get the result.

We obtain the following result.

Proposition 5.3.2

Let x = x(s) be a regular curve ingiven with nonzero Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3. Then Frenet 4-frame, V̄1, 2, 3and V̄4and Frenet curvatures κ̄1, κ̄2and κ̄3of the involute χ̄ of order 3 of a regular curve x inare given by

V¯1(s)=V4,V¯2(s)=-V3,V¯3(s)=V2,V¯4(s)=V1,

and

κ¯1=κ3ψ,κ¯2=κ2ψ,κ¯3=-κ1ψ,

where ψ(s) = λ3(s)κ3(s).

Proof

Let χ̄ = χ̄(s) be the involute of order 3 of the curve x in . Then by the use of (3.2) with (3.3), we get

x¯(s)=ψV4

where ψ = λ3(s)κ3(s) is a differentiable function. Further, the differentiation of (5.33) implies that

x¯(s)=-ψκ3V3+ψV4,x¯(s)=κ2κ3ψV2-{2κ3ψ+κ3φ}V3+{ψ-κ32ψ}V4.

Consequently, substituting

E=κ2κ3ψF=2κ3ψ+κ3φG=ψ-κ32ψ

the last vector becomes

x¯=EV2-FV3+GV4.

Furthermore, differentiating χ̄‴ with respect to s we get

x¯=-κ1EV1+{κ2F+E}V2+{κ2E-κ3G-F}V3+{G-κ3F}V4.

Hence, substituting (5.33)–(5.36) into (2.4) and (2.5), after some calculations we get the result.

Corollary 5.3.3

The involute χ̄ of order 3 of a ccr-curve x inis also a ccrcurve of.

Proof

Let x be a regular ccr-curve of . Since the ratios

κ¯2κ¯1=κ2κ3κ¯3κ¯2=-κ1κ2

are constant functions then the involute curve χ̄ is also a ccr-curve.

Let x = x(s) be a generic curve in given with Frenet frame V1, V2, V3, …, Vn and Frenet curvatures κ1, κ2, …, κn−1. For simplicity, we can take n = m + 1, to construct the Frenet frame V1 = T, V2 = N1, V3 = N2, …, Vn = Nm and Frenet curvatures κ1, κ2, …, κm. The centre of the osculating hypersphere of x at a point lies in the hyperplane normal to the x at that point. The curve passing through the centers of the osculating hyperspheres of x defined by

x˜=x+i=1mciNi,

which is called generalized evolute (or focal curve) of x, where c1, c2, …, cm are smooth functions of the parameter of the curve x. The function ci is called the ith focal curvature of γ. Moreover, the function c1 never vanishes and c1=1k1 [18].

The differentiation of the equation (6.1) and the Frenet formulae (2.1) give the following equation

x˜(s)=(1-κ1c1)T+(c1-κ2c2)N1+i=2m-1(ci-1κi+ci-ci+1κi+1)Ni+(cm-1κm+cm)Nm.

Since, the osculating planes of are the normal planes of x, and the points of are the center of the osculating sphere of x then the generalized evolutes of the curve x are determined by

x˜(s),T(s)=x˜(s),N1(s)==x˜(s),Nm-1(s)=0.

This condition is satisfied if and only if

1-κ1c1=0c1-κ2c2=0ci-1κi+ci-ci+1κi+1=0,         2im-1.

hold. So, the focal curvatures of a curve parametrized by arclength s satisfy the following ”scalar Frenet equation” for cm ≠ 0 :

Rm22cm=cm-1κm+cm

where

Rm=x˜-x=c12+c22++cm2

is the radius of the osculating m-sphere [18]. Consequently, the generalized evolutes of the curve x are represented by the formulas (6.1), and

x˜(s)=(cm-1κm+cm)Nm.

If x̃′(s) = 0, then Rm is constant and the curve x is spherical.

From the equalities in (6.4) one can get (see, [18])

κi=c1c1+c2c2++ci-1ci-1ci-1ci.

The following result gives the relations between the Frenet frames and Frenet curvatures of x and its evolute .

Theorem 6.1.([18])

Let x = x(s) be a generic curve ingiven with Frenet frame T, N1, N2, …, Nm and Frenet curvatures κ1, κ2, …, κm. Then Frenet frame T̃, Ñ1, Ñ2, …, Ñm and Frenet curvatures κ̃1, κ̃2, …, κ̃m of the generalized evolute x̃ of x inare given by

T˜=ɛNmN˜k=δkNm-k;         1km-1N˜m=±T

and

κ˜1κm=κ˜2κm-1==κ˜mκ1=1cm-1κm+cm

where (s) is the sign of (cm-1κm+cm) (s) and δk the sign of (−1)kε(s)κm(s).

6.1. Evolutes in

A generalized evolute of a regular curve x in has the parametrization

x˜(s)=x(s)+c1(s)N1(s)+c2(s)N2(s)

where N1 and N2 are normal vectors of x in and c1, c2 are focal curvatures satisfying

c1(s)=1κ1(s),         c2(s)=ρ(s)κ2(s).

where ρ=c1=1κ1 is the radius of the curvature of x.

We obtain the following result.

Proposition 6.1.1

Let x = x(s) be a regular curve ingiven with nonzero Frenet curvatures κ1and κ2. Then Frenet curvatures κ̃1and κ̃2of the evolute x̃ of the curve x are given by

κ˜1=κ22ρκ22+ρ,         κ˜2=κ1κ2ρκ22+ρ.

whereρ=1κ1is the radius of the curvature of x.

Proof

As a consequence of (6.9) we get (6.12).

Corollary 6.1.2

The evolute x̃ of a generalized helix inis also a generalized helix in.

By the use of (6.5) with (6.11) one can get the following result.

Corollary 6.1.3

A regular curve with nonzero curvatures κ1and κ2lies on a sphere if and only if

(ρκ2)+ρκ2=0

holds, whereρ=1κ1is the radius of the curvature of x.

A generalized evolute of a generic curve x in has the parametrization

x˜(s)=x(s)+c1(s)N1(s)+c2(s)N2(s)+c3(s)N3(s)

where N1, N2 and N3 are normal vectors of x in and c1, c2 and c3 are focal curvatures satisfying

c1(s)=1κ1(s),         c2(s)=ρ(s)κ2(s),c3(s)=ρ(s)κ2(s)+(ρ(s)κ2(s))κ3(s).

where ρ=1κ1 is the radius of the curvature of x.

We obtain the following result.

Proposition 6.2.1

Let x = x(s) be a regular curve ingiven with nonzero Frenet curvatures κ1, κ2and κ3. Then Frenet 4-frame, T̃, Ñ1, Ñ2and Ñ3and Frenet curvatures κ̃1, κ̃2and κ̃3of the evolute x̃ of a regular curve x inare given by

T˜(s)=N3,N˜1(s)=-N2,N˜2(s)=N1,N˜3(s)=T,

and

κ˜1=κ3ψ,κ˜2=κ2ψ,κ˜3=-κ1ψ

whereψ(s)=c2(s)κ3(s)+c3(s)is a smooth function.

Proof

As a consequence of (6.8) with (6.9) we get the result.

Corollary 6.2.2

The evolute x̃ of a ccr-curve x inis also a ccr-curve of.

Proof

Let x be a regular ccr-curve of . Since the ratios

κ˜2κ˜1=κ2κ3κ˜3κ˜2=-κ1κ2

are constant functions then the evolute curve is also a ccr-curve.

By the use of (6.6) with (6.11) one can get the following result.

Corollary 6.2.3

A regular curve with nonzero curvatures κ1, κ2and κ3lies on a sphere if and only if

(ρ(s)κ2(s)+(ρ(s)κ2(s))κ3(s))+ρ(s)κ3(s)κ2(s)=0

holds, whereρ=1κ1is the radius of the curvature.

Proposition 6.2.4

[11] A curveis a spherical, i.e., it is contained in a sphere of radius R, if and only if x can be decomposed as

x(s)=m-Rκ1N1(s)+Rκ1κ2κ12N2(s)+Rκ3(κ1κ2κ12)N3(s).

where m is the center of the sphere.

  1. Bruce, JW, and Giblin, PJ (1992). Curves and singularities: a geometrical introduction to singularity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  2. Divjak, B, and Šipuš, ŽM (1999). Involutes and evolutes in n-dimensional simply isotropic space . J Inf Org Sci. 23, 71-79.
  3. Fukunaga, T, and Takahashi, M (2014). Evolutes of fronts in the Euclidean plane. J Singul. 10, 92-107.
  4. Fukunaga, T, and Takahashi, M (2016). Involutes of fronts in the Euclidean plane. Beitr Algebra Geom. 57, 637-653.
    CrossRef
  5. Gluck, H (1966). Higher curvatures of curves in Euclidean space. Amer Math Monthly. 73, 699-704.
    CrossRef
  6. Henderson, GP (1954). Parallel curves. Canadian J Math. 6, 99-107.
    CrossRef
  7. Huygens, C (1673). Horologium oscillatorium sive de motu pendulorum ad horologia aptato. Demonstrationes Geometricae.
  8. Kılıç, B, Arslan, K, and Öztürk, G (2008). Tangentially cubic curves in Euclidean spaces. Differ Geom Dyn Syst. 10, 186-196.
  9. Klein, F, and Lie, S (1871). Uber diejenigen ebenenen kurven welche durch ein geschlossenes system von einfach unendlich vielen vartauschbaren linearen Transformationen in sich übergehen. Math Ann. 4, 50-84.
    CrossRef
  10. Milin-Šipuš, Ž, and Divjak, B (1998). Curves in n-dimensional k-isotropic space. Glas Mat Ser III. 33, 267-286.
  11. Monterde, J (2007). Curves with constant curvature ratios. Bol Soc Mat Mexicana (3). 13, 177-186.
  12. Öztürk, G, Arslan, K, and Hacisalihoglu, HH (2008). A characterization of ccr-curves in ℝm. Proc Est Acad Sci. 57, 217-224.
    CrossRef
  13. Özyılmaz, E, and Yılmaz, S (2009). Involute-Evolute curve couples in the Euclidean 4-space. Int J Open Probl Comput Sci Math. 2, 168-174.
  14. Romero-Fuster, MC, and Sanabria-Codesal, E (1999). Generalized evolutes, vertices and conformal invariants of curves in ℝn+1. Indag Math. 10, 297-305.
    CrossRef
  15. Salkowski, E (1909). Zur transformation von raumkurven. Math Ann. 66, 517-557.
    CrossRef
  16. Turgut, M, and Ali, TA (2010). Some characterizations of special curves in the Euclidean space . Acta Univ Sapientiae Math. 2, 111-122.
  17. Uribe-Vargas, R (2004). On singularites, “perestroikas” and differential geometry of space curves. Enseign Math. 50, 69-101.
  18. Uribe-Vargas, R (2005). On vertices, focal curvatures and differential geometry of space curves. Bull Braz Math Soc. 36, 285-307.
    CrossRef