Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Methodol. Mar 26, 2014; 4(1): 26-45
Published online Mar 26, 2014. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v4.i1.26
Molecular biomarkers for grass pollen immunotherapy
Florin-Dan Popescu, Department of Allergology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Nicolae Malaxa” Clinical Hospital, Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, 022441 Bucharest, Romania
Author contributions: Popescu FD solely contributed to the manuscript.
Correspondence to: Florin-Dan Popescu, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Allergology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Nicolae Malaxa” Clinical Hospital, Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, 022441 Bucharest, Sector 2, Romania. florindanpopescu@ymail.com
Telephone: + 40-21-2555405 Fax: + 40-21-2555275
Received: November 23, 2013
Revised: January 5, 2014
Accepted: February 16, 2014
Published online: March 26, 2014

Abstract

Grass pollen allergy represents a significant cause of allergic morbidity worldwide. Component-resolved diagnosis biomarkers are increasingly used in allergy practice in order to evaluate the sensitization to grass pollen allergens, allowing the clinician to confirm genuine sensitization to the corresponding allergen plant sources and supporting an accurate prescription of allergy immunotherapy (AIT), an important approach in many regions of the world with great plant biodiversity and/or where pollen seasons may overlap. The search for candidate predictive biomarkers for grass pollen immunotherapy (tolerogenic dendritic cells and regulatory T cells biomarkers, serum blocking antibodies biomarkers, especially functional ones, immune activation and immune tolerance soluble biomarkers and apoptosis biomarkers) opens new opportunities for the early detection of clinical responders for AIT, for the follow-up of these patients and for the development of new allergy vaccines.

Key Words: Biomarkers, Molecular allergy, Grass pollen immunotherapy

Core tip: A concomitant approach of the component-resolved diagnosis biomarkers used to guide prescription of grass pollen immunotherapy, particularly important in regions of the world where grass pollen seasons temporal overlap with other types of pollen, together with candidate predictive biomarkers of clinical efficacy for this type of immunotherapy, classified as tolerogenic dendritic cells and regulatory T cells biomarkers, antibodies biomarkers, especially functional ones, immune activation and immune tolerance soluble biomarkers and apoptosis biomarkers, represents a methodological original presentation with an important educational role in the field molecular allergy considered imperative for clinical practice.



INTRODUCTION

Molecular biomarkers are indicators of biological or pathogenic processes, or reponses to therapeutic interventions, which possess properties that allow their objective (reliable and accurate) measurements in biological samples, and include nucleic acid-based biomarkers, gene expression products, metabolites, polysaccharides and other molecules. These non-imaging markers, with an important role in the development of personalized medicine, can be classified (Table 1) into disease-related and therapy-related biomarkers[1-11]. Such biomarkers can be exploratory, probably valid or valid, according to differences in their scientific proposals, consensus in the medical community and acceptance by regulatory agencies.

Table 1 General classification of molecular biomarkers[1-11].
BiomarkersDefinitions, comments
Disease-related genomic and proteomic biomarkers
Disease risk biomarkersBiomarkers associated with the risk of a disease
Diagnostic biomarkersIndicators of the presence of a disease in an individual, including molecular diagnosis, early disease detection and screening biomarkers
Disease staging biomarkersBiomarkers for assessing disease severity
Disease prognostic biomarkersIndicators of the likely course/outcome of a disease for an individual; originally defined as markers that indicate the likely natural course of a disease in an untreated individual, also used to define the baseline risk that suggest the likely outcome of a disease independent of treatment
Drug-related biomarkers (provide information about a patient’s response to a therapeutic intervention)
Pharmacogenomic biomarkersDefining a DNA or RNA characteristic that is indicator of a response to a therapeutic intervention, facilitate the combination of therapeutics with diagnostics through pharmacogenetics (the study of genetic influence on drug response) and pharmacogenomics (the study of how genomic variation influences drug response)
Proof-of-mechanism biomarkersAssess, in clinical trials, whether a drug has impacted its target
Drug activity biomarkersTrack the effect of a therapeutic intervention in accordance with its mechanism of action
Pharmacodynamic biomarkersMeasure the effect of a drug on the disease and determine the most effective dose for the patient, as efficacy biomarkers
Toxicity biomarkersDetermine the underlying susceptibility of a patient for a particular side effect or group of side effects
Surrogate biomarkersIntended to substitute a clinical endpoint in clinical trials and expected to predict clinical benefit
Integral biomarkersUsed in clinical trials for eligibility, stratification, or treatment assignment
Integrated biomarkersIntended to be used in clinical trials for hypothesis generation or testing, without impact on the treatment
Predictive biomarkersPretreatment or baseline measurements used to predict the patient response to a particular treatment

The role of biomarkers has become increasingly important in molecular diagnostics and in guiding decisions related to drug development, clinical trials and modern personalized therapy. Significant progress has been made in the scientific research of oncology and neurological biomarkers, and also in the field of inflammatory and immunological biomarkers[12-14].

Allergen-driven inflammation is the key pathogenic mechanism in respiratory allergies. Standard treatments, such as receptor agonists (glucocorticosteroids, beta2-agonists), inverse agonists or antagonists (nonsedating H1 antihistamines, CysLT1 leukotriene receptor antagonists) are used to treat symptoms, without eliminating the cause of allergy. Because conventional pharmacotherapy fails to restore dysregulated immune responses and, in some patients, to totally control clinical manifestations of allergy, there is a need for new treatment strategies. Although therapeutic tools for manipulation of gene expression in allergic diseases has received increased attention in the emerging era of functional genomics[15], only allergy immunotherapy (AIT) that aims to induce immune tolerance to allergens has reached a good level of robustness as an evidence-based therapy and is currently the only treatment with long-lasting clinical effects with the potential to modify the natural course of the disease. For allergic rhinitis and asthma, AIT is effective in reducing symptom scores and medication use, improving quality of life, and inducing favorable changes in specific immunological markers[16]. The diagnosis of respiratory allergy is usually based on skin prick tests and/or the measurement of allergen-specific IgE in serum. Currently, two types of AIT are in clinical practice: subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). SLIT is a valid non-invasive and better tolerated alternative to SCIT. Special indications of this local type of immunotherapy exist in patients uncontrolled with optimal pharmacotherapy, in whom pharmacotherapy induces undesirable side effects, those who do not want to be on long-term pharmacotherapy or refusing injections[17,18]. SLIT tablets, with the convenience of self-administration, fulfill the requirements from the regulatory agencies that make mandatory pharmaceutical quality and are authorized as drugs available for grass pollen allergy[19]. Intranasal and intrabronchial immunotherapies are not commonly used because of administration-associated local symptoms[16]. New routes for grass AIT are under evaluation in clinical trials (intralymphatic into inguinal lymph node under ultrasound control, epicutaneous via patch type epidermal delivery system)[20,21]. Second generation AIT vaccines based upon recombinant allergens (combined with mucoadhesive vector systems in sublingual products) are being developed as an alternative to conventional allergen extracts[22]. A mixture of different wild-type recombinant grass-specific allergen components of Timothy grass, adsorbed onto aluminium hydroxide, was studied as SCIT in grass pollen allergy, some of them being strong candidates for use as therapeutic vaccines[23,24]. Recombinant allergens for AIT aim to overcome the problems of natural extracts as they can be produced in unlimited amounts with exact physicochemical and immunological properties[25].

Currently, molecular diagnostic biomarkers can be used to guide AIT in the frame of component-resolved management of allergic diseases[26]. Identification and validation of biomarkers that are predictive of AIT clinical response are still unmet needs[16]. Recent advances in molecular biotechnology are destined to revolutionize immunotherapy treatments[27].

The major global health problem represented by respiratory allergies is due to their high prevalence, significant influence on quality of life and strong impact on work and school performance, productivity and economic burden. Allergic rhinitis is estimated to affect some 1.4 billion people globally and asthma is estimated to affect 300 million individuals worldwide. Respiratory allergies affect all age groups and frequently coexist in the same subjects[28-31].

Pollen allergy is a public health threat of pandemic proportions. The most common outdoor allergens responsible for respiratory allergies are the pollen grains of anemophilous plants (wind-pollinated plants), such as of grasses, trees and weeds, each with specific seasons. Exposure to pollen grains depends of the plant type, wild spreading or cultivation, geographic area, altitude, air currents, temperature, precipitation and other weather events. Grass pollen is an important cause of pollinosis with a remarkable clinical impact all over the world. Its frequency differs regionally, but in many parts of the world, grass-induced respiratory allergy is the most common pollen allergy[27,32,33].

In the search for genomic biomarkers, some researchers tried to identify genetic variants associated with pollen sensitization. In studies performed more than a decade ago, susceptibility to grass allergy was associated with an increased frequency of HLA-DQB1*0301 when compared with the control population[34], while by both nonparametric and parametric statistical methods, scientists found significant associations between specific IgE to ryegrass group 1 and 2 allergens with HLA-DR3[35] and specific IgE to ryegrass group 3 allergens with HLA-DR3 and DR5[36]. A recent genome-wide meta-analysis revealed genetic variants associated with grass pollen sensitization in European adults. The HLA variant rs7775228 (6p21.32), which cis-regulates HLA-DRB4, was strongly associated with grass sensitization (pgrass = 1.6 × 10-9). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2155219, located at 11q13.5, upstream of chromosome 11 open reading frame 30 and downstream of leucine-rich repeat containing 32, was also strongly and consistently associated (pgrass = 9.4 × 10−9). The third-strongest association (pgrass = 1.2 × 10−8) was for rs17513503 located at the 5q22.1 locus near transmembrane protein 232 and solute carrier family 25, member 46. SNP rs1898671 from thymic stromal lymphopoietin gene showed weak association with grass sensitization (pgrass = 9 × 10−3)[37]. In a Japanese study on matrix metalloproteinase 9 gene SNPs and pollen allergy in children, a haplotype associated with -1590T and 668Q revealed a significant association with cedar pollinosis and orchard grass pollinosis (corrected p = 0.0012 and p = 0.0059, respectively)[38]. Although findings from such studies could enhance the understanding of immunological mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of pollen allergy, with possible implications for prevention and treatment, additional scientific data are needed to evaluate genetic determinants, not only for IgE sensitization, but also for potential circulating biomarkers.

Currently, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) biomarkers can be used to evaluate sensitization to grass pollen allergens. In patients with multi-sensitization, sensitization to cross-reactive panallergen biomarkers, specific IgE to profilins and/or polcalcins, may reduce the anticipated response to pollen AIT. In patients with mono-/oligo-sensitization profiles, major species-specific non-glycosylated allergen biomarkers, specific IgE to Poaceae- and Pooideae-specific molecules, suggest suitability for AIT[26].

A better understanding of the AIT mechanisms of action to induce peripheral tolerance to allergens is useful to identify proper candidate predictive biomarkers for AIT efficacy: biomarkers of tolerogenic dendritic cells (DCs), T cell biomarkers, antibody biomarkers, immune activation and immune tolerance soluble biomarkers, and apoptosis biomarkers[39-44].

Molecular biomarkers for grass pollen immunotherapy are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Molecular biomarkers summarized for grass pollen allergy immunotherapy[26,39-44].
BiomarkersDescription, comments
CRD biomarkers used to guide AIT prescription
Serum specific IgE antibodies to rPhl p 1, rPhl p 2, rPhl p 5, rPhl p 6Molecular specific biomarkers of genuine sensitization to Poaceae grass pollen
Serum specific IgE antibodies to nCyn d 1Molecular specific biomarkers of genuine sensitization to Chloridoideae grass pollen
Serum specific IgE antibodies to CCDsMolecular biomarkers of sensitization to CCDs involved in specific IgE assays cross-reactivity
Serum specific IgE antibodies to rPhl p 7Molecular biomarkers of sensitization to pollen polcalcin panallergens cross-reactive with pollen from most plants
Serum specific IgE antibodies to rPhl p 12Molecular biomarkers of sensitization to pollen profilin panallergens cross-reactive with pollen, some plant-derived foods and latex
Predictive candidate biomarkers of AIT clinical efficacy
Stabilin-1 (intracellular scavenger receptor), C1Q complement component expressionIntracellular biomarkers of tolerogenic dendritic cells
Coregulatory PD-L1 (B7-H1, CD274) expressionSurface cell biomarker of tolerogenic antigen presenting cells
Peripheral IL-10+Foxp3+ cells proportion among CD25+ CD4+ leukocytesRegulatory T cell biomarker
Serum allergen-specific IgE to total IgE ratioAllergen-specific antibodies biomarkers
Serum allergen-specific IgG4, IgG1 and IgA2
Inhibition of CD23-dependent IgE-FAB to B cells, serum specific IgE-BF competing with IgE for allergen bindingFunctional biomarkers of serum IgG-associated inhibitory activity
Serum neopterin and kynurenine-tryptophan ratioMolecular biomarkers of T cell mediated immune activation
Serum sHLA-GNon-classical MHC class I immune tolerance molecular biomarker
Serum sTRAILTRAIL biomarker
COMPONENT-RESOLVED DIAGNOSTIC BIOMARKERS
Used to guide prescription of grass pollen immunotherapy

Recognition of disease-causing allergen components involved in pollen allergy, using the specific IgE against recombinant allergen components as molecular biomarkers, is of utmost importance, especially in patients with multiple sensitizations to different pollen types from plants, with total or partial, temporal and spatial overlap of significant airborne pollen concentration periods. This is particularly imperative in patients with a clinical suboptimally informative history, in regions of the world with great anemophilous plant biodiversity and/or areas where unrelated plants have pollination seasons which are at least partially concomitant in some months of the year[45]. Retrospective symptom assessment is not a reliable method as grass pollen symptoms interfere with the recollection of symptoms induced by other pollen[46].

There is general consensus that AIT should be indicated in patients presenting with established clinical relevance for an allergen source. When seasonal symptoms point to grass pollen allergy, in vivo and/or in vitro testing typically confirm the presence of specific IgE to this type of pollen. In cases of IgE-sensitization to more than one pollen source from grasses, trees or weeds, it is essential to identify the clinically significant pollen types and exclude any source that may appear involved due to cross-reactivity, thus misrecognizing the primary sensitizing source, and compromising the expected immunological responses to AIT[26].

Grasses are universally distributed. Grass pollen grains are produced by wild or cultivated herbaceous plants (Table 3) belonging to Liliopsida class, Poales order, Poaceae family (Gramineae).

Table 3 Grasses (Poaceae family) which are sources of the most allergenic pollen grains[31,32,47].
SubfamilyTribeSpecies (common names)
PooideaePoeaePhleum pratense (Timothy grass, Herd's grass, meadow cat's-tail) Lolium perenne (perennial ryegrass) Dactylis glomerata (orchard grass or cock’s foot grass) Poa pratensis (smooth meadow grass or bluegrass) Anthoxanthum odoratum (sweet vernal grass) Festuca pratensis syn. F. elatior (meadow fescue) Holcus lanatus (velvet grass or Yorkshire fog) Agrostis capillaris syn. A. tenuis or A. vulgaris (bent grass) Arrhenatherum elatius syn. Helictotrichon elatius (tall oat grass) Avena fatua (wild oat) Avena sativa (cultivated oat)
TriticeaeHordeum vulgare (barley) Secale cereale (rye) Triticum aestivum ssp. vulgare (cultivated bread wheat)
BromeaeBromus inermis (smooth brome)
ChloridoideaeCynodonteaeCynodon dactylon (Bermuda grass, Bahama grass, Devil grass)
PanicoideaeAndropogoneaeSorghum halepense (Johnson grass)
PaniceaePaspalum notatum (Bahia grass)

The most abundant allergenic grass pollen in many temperate regions originates from tall grasses (up to 1.4 m tall), such as Phleum pratense, Dactylis glomerata and Arrhenatherum elatius. Cultivated rye also has a remarkably high pollen production. Allergenic cross-reactivity between the members of the Pooideae subfamily grasses of temperate regions (Lolium perenne, Phleum pratense, Poa pratensis) is extensive, but it is limited with other tropical or subtropical grasses, such as Cynodon dactylon and Paspalum notatum[32,47,48].

Monitoring pollen in the air, carried out by various gravimetric, impaction and suction sampling devices, may be used for the management of pollen allergy, and for biomedical and biological research. The Hirst trap and later modified Burkard or Lanzoni traps are widely used samplers. Counting and identifying pollen grains is performed by optical microscopy. Pollen calendars are created based on differences in airborne pollen recorded in time[49]. Although pollen is routinely monitored, it is unknown whether pollen counts represent allergen exposure because pollen grains can vary substantially in allergen release, even although they are morphologically identical. There is a switch of importance from pollen count to pollen potency in the modern molecular era of aerobiology[50,51]. Phenological studies reveal that airborne grass pollen results from both local and distant sources, although the pollen airborne concentration peaks usually appear when such local herbaceous plants are shedding the greatest amounts of pollen. Although there is an association between flowering phenology and airborne pollen records for some of the tree and weed pollen types, for Poaceae the flowering and airborne pollen peaks usually do not coincide, with up to one week difference in phase[52]. Moreover, diurnal variations, climate and weather changes impact pollen exposure. Meteorological factors (temperature, wind speed, humidity, rain, thunderstorms) along with climatological regimes (warm or cold anomalies, dryer and wetter periods) influence pollen distribution. Human activities increase atmospheric greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, and induce changes in global climate. Over the last decades, high temperatures and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration have impacted plant and pollen distribution and induced changes in quantitative production and dispersion of pollen, pollen seasons and allergen content of pollen grains, which are region and species-specific[32,53,54].

Grass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap with other types of pollen must be discussed for different regions in the world (Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8). Diagnostic molecular biomarkers represented by specific IgE against recombinant allergen components, are especially important in patients with multiple sensitizations to different pollen types within this context.

Table 4 Grass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap in Europe[32,55-59].
RegionsGrass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap with other types of pollen
Northern, Western, Central and Eastern EuropeGrass flowering period starts at the beginning of May, finishes at the end of July Some grass plants are in flower even in August, even September (e.g., Poland) Air concentration of grass pollen usually peaks in June; pollination occurs about two-three weeks earlier at sea level and thereafter in the mountain regions
Birch (Betula spp): Western Europe flowering period starts at the end of March, Central and eastern Europe from early April until May (2-8 wk), Northern Europe from late April to late May Ash tree (Fraxinus spp): In Central and South-Eastern Europe flowering period may partially overlap (April to May) with grass pollen season
Asteraceae weeds, such as ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia var. elatior and mugwort Artemisia vulgaris, pollen season in Central and Eastern Europe may last from July to August-September
Plantain Plantago spp: Pollen season from May to September in Eastern Europe
Mediterranean regions of EuropeDifferent grasses are flowering between April and August
Olive (Olea europaea): Pollen season lasts from April to June, in regions of Greece, Spain, and southern Italy, overlapping grass pollen season
Plane (Platanus spp): Pollen season partially overlapping with grass season, from April to May, in Southern France or Spain
Pellitory Parietaria spp: Pollen has a long persistence in the atmosphere in the Mediterranean region, from April to October, even longer (perennial)
Asteraceae weeds: Pollinate from August to October, similar to Chenopodiaceae/Amaranthaceae pollen from salt-tolerant weeds significant also for semi-arid areas
Plantain Plantago lanceolata: Pollen season from April to July in Northern Spain
European islands with special climate characteristicsIceland (cold-temperate oceanic country): Some grass species and sorrel (Rumex spp) flower in June, both with peaks in July; a second peak of grass-pollen is possible in some years in August; pollen season tails off in September; birch pollen season is short, starting in the second part of May until the beginning of June
Canary Islands (Spanish archipelago with subtropical climate): Long-range transport of Poaceae and Amarantaceae/Chenopodiaceae pollen from southern Iberian Peninsula and Morocco (mixed with Oleaceae tree pollen) and from the African Saharan sector and Sahel
Table 5 Grass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap in Africa[60-65].
RegionsGrass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap with other types of pollen
Extremely variable pollen seasons exist due to great differences in plant distribution
Morocco (North Africa)Mediterranean region: grass pollen season starts in April and has highest air pollen concentration in May and June, overlapping olive pollen season
Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) from Arecaceae family is distributed not only in the Mediterranean areas of Morroco, but also Middle East and central Africa
Nigeria (West Africa)Southwest region: at the end of the dry season, in March, airborne pollen grains of Chenopodiaceae/Amaranthaceae and Poaceae coexist in significant concentrations
South AfricaGrass pollinating season peaks from October to February (longer grass flowering); in subtropical regions, grasses of the subfamily Panicoideae are predominant: Cenchrus clandestinum (kikuyu) and Stenotaphrum secundatum (buffalo grass)
South African Cupressaceae (cypress) trees start flowering in June, followed by Quercus robur (oak) in late July, Platanus (plane) in September and Olea europaea subsp. africana (olive) in January, and because their pollen season duration lasts three to four months it overlaps the grass pollen season
Plantago lanceolata (English plantain) and Chenopodiaceae (goosefoot) are most important weeds with pollen seasons in late summer and autumn, overlapping with the grass pollen season
Table 6 Grass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap in Asia[32,66-84].
RegionsGrass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap with other types of pollen
Western Asia,Most Middle East countries: significant grass and weed pollen seasons during April to May and September to October
Middle EastDesert and semi-desert countries: Chenopodiaceae pollen season overlapping with grass pollen season, such as for Cynodon dactylon
Indigenous trees/shrubs, such as mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) and date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) pollen seasons from March to May, also in Egypt
Israel: Cupressaceae (cypress family) and Poaceae pollen seasons throughout the year, grasses especially in spring (March-May), cypresses February and April; Olea europaea flowering begins in late March till July-August; Parietaria judaica pollen highly allergenic in northern Israel
Turkey Mediterranean coastal area (Antalya): grass pollen frequently detected between April-May and October-November and found in the atmosphere in high concentrations during May to July; Pinaceae pollen airborne between March and June; Cupressaceae pollen, in high levels in February, usually present until May; Chenopodiaceae/Amaranthaceae pollen grains found in air during June to October, all overlapping with the grass pollen season
South AsiaGrass pollen season overlaps with seasons of many other anemophilous plants
Pakistan: paper mulberry (Broussonetia papyrifera, family Moraceae) pollen season from March to April overlaps with the grass pollen season
India: spring (February-April), autumn (September-October), winter (November-January) pollen seasons include periods of flowering of grasses (Cynodon dactylon, Paspalum distichum, Sorghum vulgare, Poa annua), of weeds Cannabaceae (Cannabis sativa), Asteraceae (Parthenium, Artemisia spp), and Chenopodiaceae (Amaranthus, Chenopodium spp), and of trees (Prosopis juliflora, Cocos and Eucalyptus spp)
East AsiaBeijing and different provinces of the People's Republic of China, such as Guangdong, Yunnan and Hebei: pollen season lasting from August to October is due to weed pollen from different plant families, Chenopodiaceae, Asteraceae (mugwort Artemisia spp), Cannabaceae (hop Humulus spp), but also to grass pollen
South Korea: grass pollen airborne between end of April and November, especially Korean lawn grass, Timothy grass, Bermuda grass, and orchard grass; Pollen seasons of trees (pine, birch, oak) and weeds (mugwort, ragweed, Japanese hop) overlap with grass pollination period in the first, respectively last part of it
Japan: pollen season for Japanese cypress/hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa) lasts from March to May, while for orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), in May-June to August, and for weed yomogi Artemisia, from August to October
Olive pollen from May to June overlaps with orchard grass season in Shodoshima
Plantago lanceolata pollen dispersed from mid-May to early September, in Sapporo
Table 7 Grass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap in America[28,85-93].
RegionsGrass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap with other types of pollen
United States of America and Canada (North America)Temperate regions: tree pollen predominates in spring, grasses in late spring and early summer, and weeds from summer until fall, with variable overlap periods
Ragweed (Ambrosia spp) pollen season starts in July and peaks between August and October, warming by latitude being associated with increased length of pollen season in central North America
Mountain cedar (Juniperus ashei) pollen season, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, central Texas, lasts from December to February, not overlapping with grass pollen period
Southern Texas, on the western Gulf Coast: airborne grass pollen concentrations have two peaks, one in May (due to cool temperate grass species) and one in September and October (due to temperate and subtropical species), long distance dispersal of grass pollen is possible also out of season
Subtropical regions, such as Southern California, Florida: grass pollen season dispersed all year overlaps with Cupressaceae trees (December through May), Asteraceae, Chenopodiaceae weeds pollen seasons (usually May through December)
Mexico, Central and South America (Latin America)Subtropical regions in Mexico: similar to Southern California and Florida
Mesquite (Prosopis sp) pollen in Northern Mexico and Southwestern United States
Tropical regions: grass pollen grains airborne throughout the year, overlapping with the pollination periods of trees, such as Anacardiaceae, Cupressaceae, and weeds, such as Amaranthaceae, Asteraceae and Euphorbiaceae spp
Maule region of Chile: Platanus acerifolia, Olea europaea, Cupressus spp pollen and grass pollen detected in August through November until end of January; Plantago spp, Rumex and Chenopodium spp pollen present from October to April
Table 8 Grass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap in Australasia[48,94-98].
RegionsGrass pollen seasons timing and temporal overlap with other types of pollen
AustraliaSubtropical northern regions (Brisbane, Queensland): grass pollen season, such as for Paspalum notatum, Sorghum halepense and Cynodon dactylon, from summer to autumn months, December to April, overlaps with the pollen season of groundsel bush (Baccharis halimifolia, Asteraceae family)
Oceanic southern regions (Melbourne, Victoria): temperate grasses pollinate especially in spring, from September to November, overlapping with trees Cupressus and Betula spp pollen season
New ZealandTemperate grasses form the major component of atmospheric pollen levels during spring and summer (October to February) and Plantago spp pollen season overlap

As is inferred from the presented data, grass species produce the only allergenic pollen with ubiquitous representation and clinical significance across the globe. In many regions, grass pollen seasons overlap other pollination periods of other anemophilous plants (trees and weeds); therefore, commercially marketed CRD assays for inhalant sources include grass pollen allergens[26].

Serum levels of specific IgE to recombinant and native allergen components (specific and cross-reactive pollen allergen components) can be measured in vitro using two types of tests. Singleplex diagnostic tests (one result for a single serum specimen) are the same immunoassays as those used for the IgE determinations for allergenic extracts, the difference being that the antigen is a highly purified molecule, either natural or recombinant. Multiplex diagnostic tests (several results for a single specimen) are immuno solid-phase allergen chip based on multiplex microarray-based technology, multiparameter immunoblot test system based on single purified allergen components, and a multiplex flow cytometry allergenic molecule-based micro-bead array system[45,99-103].

In contrast to traditional specific IgE biomarkers, CRD in allergy does not rely upon whole extract preparations from native allergen sources, but on quantification of specific IgE antibodies to single protein components, purified from natural sources (native allergen components) or obtained using recombinant techniques (recombinant allergen components). These modern diagnostic biomarkers are useful for a detailed CRD of the sensitization and cross-reactivity profiles, discriminating between clinically significant and irrelevant specific IgE, reduce the need for provocation testing and improve the prescription and specificity of AIT[26,45,104,105].

Molecular specific biomarkers of genuine sensitization to grass pollen

Molecular and biochemical characterization of grass pollen reveals several important specific allergen components. Timothy grass (Phleum pratense), also known as Herd’s grass, meadow cat’s-tail or common cat’s tail, belongs to the Pooideae subfamily and it is one of the most significant source of grass pollen allergens in temperate regions. Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), also known as Scutch grass, Bahama grass, Devil grass, belongs to the Chloridoideae subfamily, and it is an important grass which typically grows in warm temperate, subtropical and tropical climates areas of the world.

Specific IgE antibodies to recombinant temperate grass-specific pollen allergen components, rPhl p 1, rPhl p 2, rPhl p 5 and rPhl p 6, are biomarkers of genuine sensitization to Poaceae pollen. From references[26,33,106-124], these specific components and correspondent antibody biomarkers are discussed below.

Phl p 1 belongs to the group 1 grass pollen allergens, acidic glycoproteins with molecular mass of 31-35 kDa, a family of major allergens present in all grass species (Poaceae family-specific marker). More than 90%-95% of grass pollen allergic patients, adults or children, have specific IgE to group 1 grass pollen allergens. Group 1 grass pollen allergens are glycosylated proteins that show 60%-70% sequence identity to beta-expansin family of cell wall-loosening proteins with a role in pollen tube penetration into the style and pollen tube growth. A major IgE-reactive domain of Phl p 1 exhibits significant sequence identity of 43% with the family of immunoglobulin domain-like group 2/3 grass pollen allergens. Recombinant Phl p 1, rPhl p 1 (27 kDa) is not glycosylated and resembles native Phl p 1 (nPhl p 1) closely binding to IgE in about 90% of patients with grass pollen allergy, revealing that rPhl p 1 shares many of the IgE epitopes with natural grass allergens of the group 1. Sensitization to rPhl 1 seems to appear earlier in life in comparison with other allergen components. Group 1 grass pollen allergens with great sequence identities and homologies include, besides Phl p 1, other important allergen components from important grass pollen grains: Anthoxanthum odoratum (Ant o 1), Dactylis glomerata (Dac g 1), Holcus lanatus (Hol l 1), Lolium perenne (Lol p 1), Poa pratensis (Poa p 1). There is a partial cross-reactivity between Phl p 1 and Cyn d 1, the group 1 major allergen in Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), thus Phl p 1 is only partially specific for the Pooideae grass subfamily.

Phl p 5 is another major allergen from Timothy grass pollen and is one of the most reactive of the group 5 allergens, ribonucleases generally restricted to the Pooideae subfamily of grass pollen. Between 65%-90% of grass pollen allergic patients in temperate climate areas are sensitized against group 5 grass pollen allergens components. Grass pollen grains in ambient air is not quantitatively correlated with the airborne Phl p 5 concentration. Rainfall contributes to an increase in respirable particles containing group 5 allergens, which bursts the pollen grains. Moreover, exposure of pollen to gaseous pollutants induces a decrease in Phl p 5 detection in pollen extracts due to a mechanical loss of allergens from the altered pollen grains and/or post-translational modifications, such as ozone acidification. Phl p 5b, a smaller isoform (32 kDa), contains at least one more IgE antibody binding epitope than Phl p 5a isoform. rPhl p 5 is very similar to nPhl p 5 and reacts with serum IgE antibodies in a great part of grass pollen-allergic patients. rPhl p 5 is cross-reactive with similar group 5 allergen components: Dac g 5, Lol p 5, Poa p 5, Ant o 5. Because group 5 allergens are restricted to the Pooideae subfamily, there is a limited cross-reactivity between the pollen of temperate-type Pooideae subfamily grasses and pollen from warm temperate/subtropical-type grasses belonging to Chloridoideae (Cynodon dactylon) and Panicoideae (Paspalum notatum) subfamilies. Common reed (Phragmites communis), a grass from the Arundinoideae subfamily with a low phylogenetic affinity to Pooideae plants, produces pollen in late summer to autumn with a very low degree of cross-reactivity to group 5 allergens. There is a dissociation of the major IgE and T-cell-reactive peptide domains in Phl p 5. Specific IgE antibodies against Phl p 1 and Phl p 5 might be used as a reliable biomarker of allergy to Poaceae pollen. These major allergen components are defined on the basis of both frequency (prevalence of specific IgE antibodies) and potency (average level of specific IgE antibodies). Mono-sensitization to rPhl p 1 seems important in patients with lower IgE against Timothy grass pollen extract levels, while sensitization to rPhl p 5 is rarely found as the only sensitizing allergen.

Other grass-specific pollen allergen components must be discussed. IgE to rPhl p 2 (13 kDa) may also be regarded as a fairly specific biomarker for patients sensitized to grass species of the Pooideae subfamily. Immunologically significant group 5 and group 2 allergens seem to be absent in non-Pooideae grass pollen grains. Phl p 6 (a group 6 acidic, nonglycosylated protein of 15 kDa, for which N-terminal sequencing reveals homology to an internal region of group 5 allergens), along with Phl p 5, do not exhibit significant serological cross-reactivity to pollen allergens outside the Pooideae subfamily. rPhl p 6, with the same reactivity with serum IgE antibodies as the native molecule, can be used for in vitro diagnosis of grass pollen allergy.

In conclusion, specific IgE against rPhl p 1 is a Poaceae family-specific biomarker for genuine sensitization to grass pollen and specific IgE antibodies against rPhl p 2, rPhl p5 and rPhl p 6 are Pooideae subfamily-specific biomarkers for true sensitization to temperate grass pollen. rPhl p 1, rPhl p 5 and natural Timothy extract are used to identify grass pollen allergy. Mono/oligo-sensitized patients with specific IgE to non-glycosylated major species-specific allergen markers (Phl p 1, Phl p 5) are suitable for Pooideae grass-specific AIT[26,33,117,123].

Specific IgE antibodies to nCyn d 1, a warm climate grass-specific native pollen allergen component, represent biomarkers of genuine sensitization to Chloridoideae subfamily grass pollen, as discussed below[26,125-129]. Cyn d 1 is a major allergen most abundant in Bermuda grass pollen, representing 15% of the whole-pollen extract. The frequency of sensitization to Cyn d 1 in Bermuda grass-allergic individuals is between 76% and 100%. Cyn d 1 belongs to Group 1 grass pollen allergens, including highly cross-reactive pollen allergens from other Chloridoideae subfamily grasses, such as Bou g 1 from the pollen of the North American Grama grass (Bouteloua gracilis). Cyn d 1 is to some extent immunologically distinct from Phl p 1 from Timothy grass and therefore a suitable marker for sensitization to Cynodon dactylon. Partial cross-reactivity between Phl p 1 and Cyn d 1 may impede the identification of the sensitizing allergenic source. When testing for rPhl p 5 as a Pooideae-specific molecular biomarker is negative, relatively higher levels of IgE specific to nCyn d 1 than to rPhl p 1 have been suggested to be indicative of primary sensitization to Bermuda grass pollen, an AIT extract containing Cynodon dactylon pollen might be suitable. If testing for IgE, anti-rPhl p 5 is positive and specific IgE against nCyn d 1 higher than to rPhl p 1, there is a true double sensitization. Finally, if antibodies against Pooideae-specific molecules, such as rPhl p 5, are positive and specific IgE levels against rPhl p 1 have higher levels than those to nCyn d 1, the case is most probably primary sensitization to Pooideae grasses and Cynodon dactylon pollen representation can be omitted from the AIT regimen.

Specific IgE antibodies to recombinant and native specific allergen components from tree and weed pollen are important to differentiate the true sensitization profile in patients with multiple sensitizations, including grasses, as described below[26,47,129-139]. When testing for these specific pollen components is negative and testing for IgE against specific and cross-reactive grass allergen components, then IgE sensitization is to grass pollen. If testing for IgE against recombinant specific grass pollen components is positive and specific IgE against specific tree or weed components are also significant, the condition is a true double or multiple sensitization.

Tree pollen-specific allergen components are described for the anemophilous plants belonging to the Betulaceae family: rBet v 1, a 17 kDa pathogenesis-related protein PR-10 with ribonuclease activity from the pollen of silver birch Betula pendula or Betula verrucosa, cross-reactive with other Betulaceae pollen PR-10 components with about 70% identity to Bet v 1 (black alder Alnus glutinosa rAln g 1, hazel Corylus avellana rCor a 1.0101); Oleaceae family: nOle e 1 and rOle e 1, a 19-20 kDa trypsin inhibitor from the pollen of olive Olea europaea; Platanaceae family: rPla a 1, a 18 kDa invertase inhibitor, and nPla a 2, a 43 kDa polygalacturonase, from the pollen of plane tree Platanus acerifolia; Cupressaceae family: nCup a 1, 43 kDa pectate lyase from the pollen of Arizona cypress Cupressus arizonica, cross-reactive with other Cupressaceae pollen pectate lyase components (Japanese cedar Cryptomeria japonica nCry j).

Major native or recombinant weed pollen-specific allergen components are described for herbaceous weeds belonging to the Asteraceae (Compositae) family: nArt v 1, a 28 kDa defensin from the pollen of mugwort Artemisia vulgaris and nAmb a 1, a 38 kDa pectate lyase from the pollen of short ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia var. elatior; family Plantaginaceae: rPla l 1, a 17 kDa Ole e 1-like trypsin inhibitor from the pollen of plantain Plantago lanceolata; family Urticaceae: rPar j 2, a 14 kDa lipid transfer protein, member of the PR-14 protein family, from the pollen of wall pellitory Parietaria judaica; family Amaranthaceae/Chenopodiaceae: rChe a 1, a 24 kDa trypsin inhibitor from the pollen of goosefoot Chenopodium album and nSal k 1, a 43 kDa protein belonging to the pectin methylesterase family from the pollen of saltwort Salsola kali.

Molecular biomarkers of sensitization to carbohydrate cross-reactive determinants

Carbohydrate cross-reactive determinants (CCDs) are carbohydrate moieties of glycoproteins that induce the production of highly cross-reactive IgE, as discussed below[26,140-143]. Many allergens are glycoproteins containing carbohydrate moieties called N-glycans or O-glycans, according to their site of attachment to the protein. N-glycans containing beta1,2-xylose and alpha1,3-fucose in many glycoproteins are more extensively studied. Markers of sensitization to CCDs are bromelain (nAna c 2) and MUXF3 (Ana c 2.0101) carbohydrate epitope, the purified N-glycan from Ananas comosus bromelain, able to detect IgE to N-glycans in most pollen sources. Anti-CCD IgE biomarkers indicate the presence in serum of IgE directed against carbohydrate epitopes. CCDs rarely cause allergic reactions, but may produce positive in vitro test results to CCD-containing allergens from pollen, plant foods, insects and venoms. Patients sensitized to grass pollen develop anti-CCD IgE that also binds to CCD monovalent peanut allergens, but does not induce any clinical symptoms. Approximately 20% of patients with multiple pollen allergies have IgE antibodies to pollen allergens with molecular masses higher than 30 kDa and a great part of their IgE-binding is dependent on CCDs, a major cause of cross-reactivity for in vitro specific IgE assays. If testing for IgE against a specific native allergen component, such as nCyn d 1, is positive, because native components are CCD-containing natural purified glycoproteins, it is necessary to assess the epitope protein nature in multi-sensitized patients. In cases of positive in vitro results to a natural allergen component, negative IgE to CCD markers reveal the protein nature of IgE epitopes. Positive IgE to CCD markers should optimally be accompanied by assessment of biological activity, such as positive skin prick testing or nasal/conjunctival challenge with the allergen, important aspects in the AIT decision process.

Molecular biomarkers of sensitization to cross-reactive pollen panallergens

Panallergens, usually classified as minor allergens, are defined as homologous and structurally related proteins belonging to different biological sources and causing IgE cross-reactivity between evolutionary unrelated species. Among panallergen families, only profilins are distributed ubiquitously throughout the plant kingdom and are responsible for allergic reactions to a multitude of evolutionary unrelated pollen and food allergen sources. Occurring exclusively in pollen grains of plants, polcalcins are not involved in pollinosis-associated plant food allergies. Bet v 1 homologues represent major allergens in pollen of trees Fagales (including the Betulaceae and Fagaceae families) but can also be found in many allergenic foods belonging to the botanical families of Rosaceae (PR-10 proteins with 50%-60% identity to Bet v 1: apricot Pru ar 1, plum Pru c 1, peach Pru p 1, cherry Pru av 1, apple Mal d 1, pear Pyr c 1), Betulaceae (hazelnut Cor a 1.0101 with 50% identity to Bet v 1) and Apiaceae (PR-10 proteins with 40%-50% identity to Bet v 1: carrot Dau c 1, celery Api g 1), giving rise to many birch pollinosis-associated food allergies. Bet v 1-like allergens are not normally present in the pollen of grasses or weeds[132,144,145]. Although AIT with the recombinant major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 proved as efficient as purified native Bet v 1 or birch pollen extract[22,146], the presence of IgE-sensitization to minor allergen components acting as panallergens, profilins and/or polcalcins, would be expected to decrease the efficacy of pollen AIT, at least to some extent, especially in the absence of IgE to species-specific allergen components. Sensitization to both profilin and/or polcalcin typically follows previous cosensitization to other molecular allergens from the same pollen source, being recognized at a later stage, and it is associated with a longer duration of allergic disease and with resulting cosensitization to a larger number of species-specific allergen molecules. When molecular multi-sensitization is present, sometimes it is associated with the practical inability to administer a more appropriate, allergen-matching AIT extract. Even if the content in various pollen AIT extracts, at least for profilin, is remarkably low, if specific IgE antibodies against major allergens are present, AIT with extracts containing these allergens can be administered, especially as the clinical relevance of profilins and polcalcins is still arguable[26].

Only a limited number of pollen panallergens are available for routine use (grass profilin, rPhl p 12, and birch profilin, rBet v 2; grass polcalcin, rPhl p 7 and birch polcalcin, rBet v 4), but due to marked structural homology among allergenic species, these serve as efficient markers of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to the entire group of homologous proteins, with the possible exception of profilins from pollen of wall pellitory Parietaria judaica (Par j 3) and cypress Cupressus sempervirens (Cup s 8), the latter being cross-reactive with the goosefoot Chenopodium album profilin, Che a 2. The molecular biomarkers of sensitization to cross-reactive grass pollen panallergens are discussed below[26,117,140,145,147,148].

rPhl p 7, a 9 kDa calcium-binding protein, is used as a polcalcin marker. Phl p 7 is a minor allergen of Timothy grass pollen, recognizing serum IgE antibodies in 10%-15% of grass pollen-sensitized subjects. Phl p 7 is a polcalcin cross-reactive with other polcalcins contained in pollen grains of non-Pooideae Bermuda grass (Cyn d 7), trees, such as birch (Bet v 3), alder (Aln g 4), olive (Ole e 3), juniper (Jun o 4), and weeds, such as goosefoot (Che a 3). Unlike Bet v 3 which contains three typical calcium-binding motifs, Bet v 4 is a polcalcin which contains only two calcium-binding domains. rBet v 4, a 8 kDa calcium-binding protein, is also used as a polcalcin marker. Other weed pollen polcalcins are from Asteraceae family (Art v 5, Amb a 10). Polcalcin rPhl p 7 is therefore likely to cross-react with pollen proteins from most plants, in particular with other grass species, several weeds and trees.

rPhl p 12, a 14 kDa actin-binding protein, is used as a profilin marker. This acidic protein is involved in cytoskeleton dynamics by binding to actin. Phl p 12 is a minor allergen of Timothy grass pollen, binding IgE antibodies from approximately 15%-30% of grass pollen-allergic subjects with varying degrees in different geographical regions. Phl p 12 has more than 75% sequence identity with profilins from pollen, various plant-derived foods and latex. It is cross-reactive with pollen profilins from many plants, such as birch (Bet v 2), olive tree (Ole e 2), date palm (Pho d 2), Bermuda grass (Cyn d 12) and sunflower (Hel a 2). rBet v 2, a 15 kDa profilin, is also used as a cross-reactive marker. Other pollen profilins are those from ragweed (Amb a 8) and mugwort (Art v 4). Cross-reactivity between profilins of mugwort pollen (Art v 4) and Apiaceae foods, such as celery (Api g 4), carrot (Dau c 4) and spices, are involved in the pathogenesis of the celery-mugwort-spice syndrome. Cross-reactivity between profilins of ragweed pollen (Amb a 8) and fruits, such as melon (Cuc m 2) and banana (Mus xp 1), are involved in the pathogenesis of the ragweed-melon-banana association.

Molecular diagnosis biomarkers, together with clinical history data, can help clinicians make a better selection of the most appropriate patients and allergens for AIT[140]. Moreover, application of the component-resolved diagnosis biomarkers may change the diagnosis and the choice of AIT in some patients[149].

Taken together, the CRD biomarkers are used to guide prescription of grass pollen AIT after an initial basic diagnostic discrimination between mono/oligo- and multi-sensitization, based on skin prick testing results and/or values of in vitro evaluation of specific IgE using common pollen extracts. The use of a panel of species-specific allergen molecular markers, representing the most common allergenic species in the region, along with the panallergen screening molecules from grass pollen (polcalcin rPhl p 7 and profilin rPhl p 12), may facilitate the selection of those AIT candidates with an increased probability of benefiting from this type of treatment.

PREDICTIVE BIOMARKERS OF CLINICAL EFFICACY
In grass pollen immunotherapy

Because very complex immunological mechanisms of action, both cellular and humoral, are involved in the AIT efficacy, its long-lasting effect and the way it changes the course of IgE-mediated allergic disease, candidate biomarkers of clinical efficacy or biomarker combinations remain to be validated in order to clearly distinguish between strong and weak or early and late AIT responders[42].

The AIT mechanisms of action to induce peripheral tolerance to grass allergens may be useful to classify some candidate predictive biomarkers for AIT efficacy, especially those derived from the antigen presenting cell (APC)-regulatory T cell (Treg)-IgG4 antibody immunoregulatory loop[150]. These candidate biomarkers can be classified as tolerogenic DCs biomarkers, regulatory T cell biomarkers, serum blocking antibodies biomarkers, especially functional ones, immune activation and immune tolerance soluble biomarkers and apoptosis biomarkers[39-42,44].

Biomarkers of tolerogenic DCs

Oral APCs are key players in SLIT. Langerhans cells, CD207+ cells (Langerin or CD207 being a C-type lectin receptor localized in Birbek granules) located in the mucosa itself, with a FcepsilonRI expression greater compared with similar cells in the skin[151], and a predominant subpopulation of myeloid DCs located along the lamina propia, CD11b+CD11c- monocyte-derived DCs (moDC), are critical in capturing allergen and processing it as small peptides presented in association with major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II molecules at the cell surface. DCs loaded with allergen-derived peptides migrate to the cervical lymph nodes within 12-24 h, where they interact with naive CD4+ T cells to support the differentiation of Treg cells within 2-5 d. These CD4+ T cells subsequently migrate through blood back to mucosal tissues, resulting in allergen tolerance associated with downregulation of Th2 responses[152,153].

Intracellular and surface biomarkers of tolerogenic DCs are important to be presented.

Biomarkers of tolerogenic DCs (DCreg) are biomarkers of DCs driving differentiation of Treg cells, evidenced by differential gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry[154]. Two such biomarkers must be discussed. Stabilin-1 (STAB1) is an intracellular scavenger receptor expressed by DCs and macrophages. Complement component 1 (C1Q) is the first component of complement which may be associated with arrest of moDC differentiation and may induce tolerogenic properties in developing DCs[154-156]. Tolerogenic moDCs are the most prominent source of C1Q and STAB1 gene expression in the blood and are generated in vitro from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Induction of DCreg biomarkers (DCs in vitro treatment with dexamethasone) in PBMCs (containing < 0.5%-1% DCs) of patients with grass pollen allergy treated four months with SLIT is indicative of clinical tolerance induced by AIT (short-term efficacy)[154].

Regarding surface biomarkers of tolerogenic DCs, SLIT downregulates APC functions by modulating the expression of costimulatory molecules. There is a recent role revealed for the programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) pathway in regulating lymphocyte activation and promotion of Treg cell development and function[157]. PD-L1 (B7-H1, CD274), the programmed death ligand-1, is a coregulatory molecule critical for Treg generation with important expression on tolerogenic APCs (upregulated by TLR4 ligand monophosphoryl lipid A). PD-L1 may play an important role in induction of T regulatory cells by SLIT[158]. Pollen SLIT reduces the expression of CD86 on B cells (CD19+) and the expression of CD80 on monocytes (CD14+), and increases the expression of PD-L1 on APCs (CD14+, CD19+) evaluated by flow cytometry analysis. PD-L1 may be a major target of pre-seasonal pollen SLIT and that modulation of its expression could be used as a clinical efficacy marker[150].

Regulatory T cell biomarkers

These biomarkers may also be important because multiple mechanisms are related to Treg cells in AIT. Treg cells directly and indirectly control the activity of effector cells of allergic inflammation, such as eosinophils, basophils and mast cells. AIT-induced Treg cells inhibit the FcepsilonRI-dependent mast cell degranulation, OX40-OX40 ligand interaction playing an important role, decrease the thresholds for mast cell and basophil activation and reduce IgE-mediated histamine release[159-163]. Both main subsets, naturally occurring forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) expressing CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells and inducible IL-10-producing T regulatory type 1 (Tr1) cells, are decisive for the development of immune tolerance to allergens under AIT[163]. Mucosal Treg cell induction in SLIT was revealed by immunofluorescence microscopy, FoxP3+ cells being increased in the oral epithelium of grass pollen SLIT[164]. The induced Treg cell level defined as the proportion of IL-10+FoxP3+ cells among CD25+CD4+ leukocytes, analyzed in the peripheral blood by flow cytometry, may be a potential therapeutic biomarker for SLIT, as revealed in a preliminary report in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) pollinosis[165]. Allergen-specific CD4+ T cell responses in peripheral blood do not predict the early onset of clinical efficacy during grass pollen SLIT, as revealed in a more recent study in which these peripheral allergen-specific CD4+ T cells were assessed using pMHCII-tetramers or flow cytometry surface phenotyping, as CTLA-4+IL-10+ or CD25+CD127-FoxP3+ Treg cells. Moreover, transcription factors (GATA-3, FoxP3) and cytokines (TGF-beta) gene expression assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in allergen-stimulated peripheral cells do not predict clinical efficacy in SLIT, and the downregulation of IL-4 or IL-10 gene expression, as well as IL-10 secretion, by allergen-stimulated T cells seems to be unrelated to clinical benefit[166].

Antibodies biomarkers

The candidate antibodies biomarkers for the prediction of efficacy and monitoring of grass AIT must be discussed correlated with the allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 responses during AIT.

Serum allergen-specific IgE antibodies

Although AIT rapidly induces peripheral T-cell tolerance, B-cell changes seem to appear at a relatively later phase. Serum allergen-specific IgE values are not generally considered appropriate biomarkers to assess SIT efficacy. Sometimes they transiently increase early in SCIT, and then gradually decrease over months or years of continued treatment. In pollen-sensitive patients who have undergone AIT and become desensitized, these values do not increase during the pollen season. There is a blunting of seasonal increases in specific IgE antibodies by AIT. Very late in the course and after termination of AIT, a decrease of allergen-specific IgE values is possible, occurring one to three years after starting therapy. Changes in IgE levels cannot account for reduced responsiveness to specific allergens after AIT because the decrease in serum IgE levels is late, relatively small and poorly correlated with efficacy. The reason for the persistence of serum IgE despite clinical improvement may relate to long-lived bone-marrow-resident IgE producing plasma cells[16,40,163,167,168].

The ratio of allergen-specific IgE to total IgE (sIgE/tIgE) was proposed as a candidate prognostic biomarker for SLIT. Symptom-medication score in patients treated with pollen SLIT seems to be correlated with the sIgE/tIgE ratio before treatment, being significantly improved in patients with a low sIgE/tIgE ratio compared to that in patients with a high sIgE/tIgE ratio. The grass-specific IgE to total IgE ratio seems significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders following four years of pollen SLIT. Further validation studies are needed before this biomarker can be considered in the clinical management of SLIT[158,169].

Serum allergen-specific IgG4 antibodies

IgG4 blocking antibodies prevent allergen-induced IgE-mediated release of inflammatory mediators from basophils and mast cells, directly compete with IgE on mast cells and APCs, inhibit IgE-facilitated allergen presentation to T cells and allergen-induced IgE production during allergen exposure. There is also an IgG4-dependent blocking of IgE binding to B cells. IgG4 production is confined to human IL-10-producing regulatory B (BR1 cells or CD73-CD25+CD71+ B cells)[40,163,170,171].

Regarding serum allergen-specific IgG4 antibodies as biomarkers, only specific IgG4 antibodies with high affinity and avidity are functionally relevant. Pollen specific IgG4 may be evaluated by fluoro-enzyme immunoassay. Serum allergen-specific IgG4 levels significant increase relatively early in SIT (weeks to months after AIT start), in an allergen-dose dependent manner (10-100-fold increase) and persist for up to two years after AIT discontinuation. Although this indicates a good immunological response to AIT, there are contradictory correlations with clinical improvement, there is no correlation with clinical outcomes (after up-dosing) and there is no common cut-off value for specific IgG4 antibodies[163,170,172].

Basophil activation evaluation may be used to detect IgG blocking activity in AIT. Allergen-IgG4 complexes bind to FcgammaRIIb (low affinity IgG receptor) containing a cytoplasmic immunotyrosine inhibitory motif that counters immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif signals from FcepsilonRI (high-affinity IgE receptor). Phosphorylated FcgammaRIIb mediates inhibition of FcepsilonRI signaling, coaggregation of FcepsilonRI with FcgammaRIIB inhibits degranulation, although there is a controversial role of FcgammaRIIb in mediated post-AIT serum inhibitory activity[173,174]. Basophil activation test by flow cytometry evaluating CD203c expression, an ecto-nucleotide enzyme associated with basophil activation and piecemeal degranulation, may be a candidate biomarker for AIT monitoring, as suggested by a Japanese cedar pollen allergy study revealing a reduction in CD203c expression post-AIT[175].

Functional biomarkers of serum IgG-associated inhibitory activity in AIT may be more useful surrogates of clinical response than serum IgG4 levels.

The inhibition of CD23-dependent IgE-Facilitated Allergen Binding (IgE-FAB) to B cells assay evaluates the serum inhibitory activity for binding of allergen-IgE complexes on to B cells. It is performed incubating allergen-IgE complexes with an EBV-transformed B-cell line, complexes bound to CD23 on the surface of cells being detected by flow cytometry. Addition of serum from patients who have received AIT inhibits allergen-IgE complex binding to CD23 on B cells. The following formula may be used to calculate the percentage relative B cell binding: % relative allergen-IgE complex binding to B cells = (% IgE-FAB using indicator and immunotherapy serum/% IgE-FAB using indicator serum only) × 100. Pollen SCIT induces in grass allergic rhinitis patients time- and dose-dependent increases in antibody-associated serum inhibitory activity for IgE-FAB and increases in IgE-blocking factor (IgE-BF)[168].

Serum specific IgE-BF competing with IgE for allergen binding is determined using a wash assay, IgE measurement with a chemiluminescent immunoassay, and no-wash assay, allowing non-IgE antibodies to interact with biotinylated allergens in competition with the solid-phase absorbed IgE antibodies. The (IgE binding in competition with non-IgE)/(IgE binding with remaining Igs washed away) ratio varies from 0 to 1 (no blocking antibodies induced). Successful grass pollen SCIT is associated with significant reduced allergen-IgE binding (IgE-FAB) and increased IgE-BF[168].

Whether such functional assays of inhibitory IgG4 and IgE-BF will be validated as predictive biomarkers of clinical AIT efficacy in individual patients requires further detailed investigation.

Serum allergen-specific IgA2 antibodies

Regarding IgA subclasses, IgA1 is found in serum and produced by bone marrow B cells, while IgA2 is made by B cells located in the mucosa. The development of mucosal immune tolerance is associated with the expression of immunoregulatory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-beta) and protective antibody subclasses (IgG4 and IgA2)[164]. Long-term grass pollen AIT seems to induce a selective IgA2 subclass systemic response, which may reflect a local mucosal response. Serum Phl p 5-specific IgA2 response to AIT is associated with nasal TGF-beta expression. Allergen-specific IgA2 concentrations can be determined by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the systemic specific IgA2 response might also be surrogate biomarker of the clinical response to AIT[176].

All of these studies approaching various humoral immunological pathways involved in AIT efficacy may create a framework regarding the usefulness of antibodies biomarkers, but the mechanisms of grass pollen-specific IgG4 and also IgG1 antibody subclasses in AIT are not very well understood. IgG4 antibodies act as blocking antibodies (better than IgG1), but IgG4 production may be also an epiphenomenon, its production reflecting conditions favorable for immune tolerance such as activation of Treg cells, while regulatory B cells may produce IL-10 that promote IgG4 production[177]. Very recent data complicate the opinion on the proven utility of such humoral biomarkers. In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study using an allergen challenge chamber and quantitative, qualitative and functional analyses of allergen-specific IgE, IgG1-4 and IgA responses, clinical responders to grass pollen SLIT include both immunoreactive patients who exhibited strong increases in titers, affinity and/or blocking activity of grass-pollen-specific IgGs, as well as patients with no detectable antibody responses. Seric IgG responses may contribute to SLIT-induced clinical tolerance in some subjects, but additional immune mechanisms are involved in most patients[178]. Therefore, at the current level of knowledge, it is difficult to support the fact that antibody responses can be used as reliable biomarkers of AIT efficacy at an individual patient level.

Immune activation and immune tolerance soluble biomarkers

The immunopathogenesis of pollen respiratory allergy includes a preponderance of Th2-type responses and the biochemical pathways triggered by Th1-type cytokine interferon-gamma, such as tryptophan degradation by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and neopterin production, might be altered[179]. Neopterin is a low molecular weight soluble biomarker of immune activation, synthesized from guanosine-triphosphate and produced preferentially by human monocytes/macrophages. Neopterin production and tryptophan catabolism through the kynurenine pathway, measured by the kynurenine-tryptophan ratio, are induced by interferon gamma (IFN-gamma), thus both are considered markers of T cell mediated immune activation. Serum neopterin concentrations can be determined by an enzyme immunoassay technique. SLIT may reduce serum neopterin levels, this phenomenon being possible due to the Treg response able to induce IL-10 production, that may inhibit neopterin production. Thus, serum neopterin could be a serum biomarker of achieved immune tolerance toward the causal allergen in allergic patients successfully treated with SLIT[44,180]. Tryptophan and kynurenine serum concentrations seem to be higher in allergic rhinitis patients, especially out of pollen season. Simultaneous measurement of serum tryptophan and kynurenine may be performed by high performance liquid chromatography. Some authors suggested that non-responders to SCIT seem to have significantly higher tryptophan concentrations, higher tryptophan levels being a result of lower indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity[179], and others revealed that serum tryptophan and kynurenine concentrations decrease after pollen SCIT, and a correlation between changes in tryptophan metabolism and neopterin concentrations was also possible after AIT[181].

The non-classical MHC class I molecule HLA-G plays important immunomodulatory activities. The differentiation of Tr1 cells by tolerogenic IL-10-producing human DCs requires the IL-10-dependent ILT4/HLA-G pathway[182]. Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor B2 (LILRB2) or ILT 4 (CD85d) is a human inhibitory immune receptor that recognizes HLA-G with a higher affinity[183]. Soluble HLA-G (sHLA-G) has increased serum values in patients with pollen allergic rhinitis studied outside the pollen season[184]. These can be determined by ELISA, while cell production of IFN-gamma is possible to be evaluated by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent spot assay[185]. sHLA-G serum levels are reduced by pollen SLIT in allergic rhinitis patients and lowering of these levels and the increased IFN-gamma production after SLIT in pollen allergic rhinitis are significantly related phenomena. Thus, sHLA-G might be considered as a candidate biomarker of response to SLIT[43].

Apoptosis biomarkers

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)/Apo2L is a type II transmembrane protein that was identified and cloned based on its sequence homology with members of the TNF ligand family. TRAIL-induced initiator caspase-8 and executioner caspase-3 cleavage is enhanced by IgE-dependent activation of mast cells, which increases the expression of anti-apoptotic molecules FLIP (Fas-associated death domain-like IL-1 beta-converting enzyme-like inhibitory protease) and myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL-1 belonging to the bcl-2 family proteins), and a pro-apoptotic molecule Bcl-2 interacting mediator (BIM of cell death), thus fine modulating mast cell apoptosis[186]. Apoptosis of mast cells may be also regulated by some IgG receptors, such as FcgammaRIIB[187]. TRAIL is also present in cells, eosinophils, fibroblasts and airway epithelial cells. The soluble TRAIL (sTRAIL) is an apoptosis biomarker which can be measured in the serum by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. sTRAIL levels may decrease after SCIT to healthy levels and may be of use as a marker of efficacy of immunotherapy in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis patients[41]. The role of sTRAIL in AIT is poorly understood and this makes the evaluation of the value of this biomarker difficult.

CONCLUSION

CRD biomarkers have proven utility in the assessment of sensitization to grass pollen allergens, allow the clinician to confirm genuine sensitization to the corresponding allergen plant sources and guide an accurate prescription of AIT, important in many regions of the world with great plant biodiversity and/or where pollen seasons may overlap. These disease-related molecular biomarkers, important tools for the future in allergy diagnostics, are hitherto available for the most important grass pollen allergens, although they have not currently replaced the classical existing methods of in vivo/in vitro allergy testing. Molecular diagnostic algorithms to guide pollen immunotherapy in some European regions are already designed[26].

It is difficult to estimate which of the presented candidate predictive biomarkers for grass pollen AIT will be validated in clinical practice, but those related to tolerogenic regulatory cellular responses are most promising. Some answers to questions regarding the upcoming guidelines for the use of predictive biomarkers for AIT and the possible role of combined application of biomarkers are not known and should be addressed as potential issues in future research. The search for candidate predictive biomarkers in AIT opens new opportunities for the early detection of clinical responders during AIT, for the follow-up of AIT patients and for the development of new allergy vaccines.

Molecular allergy biomarkers represent a complex area providing novel and relevant information for allergists and educational programs on their use in clinical practice are imperative[188].

Footnotes

P- Reviewers: Muench MO, Oiso N S- Editor: Qi Y L- Editor: Roemmele A E- Editor: Liu SQ

References
1.  Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001;69:89-95.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4510]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3883]  [Article Influence: 168.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Drucker E, Krapfenbauer K. Pitfalls and limitations in translation from biomarker discovery to clinical utility in predictive and personalised medicine. EPMA J. 2013;4:7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 224]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 209]  [Article Influence: 19.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Frank R, Hargreaves R. Clinical biomarkers in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:566-580.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 562]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 463]  [Article Influence: 22.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Buyse M, Michiels S, Sargent DJ, Grothey A, Matheson A, de Gramont A. Integrating biomarkers in clinical trials. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2011;11:171-182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 101]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Feng Z, Prentice R, Srivastava S. Research issues and strategies for genomic and proteomic biomarker discovery and validation: a statistical perspective. Pharmacogenomics. 2004;5:709-719.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 91]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 95]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Schilsky RL, Doroshow JH, Leblanc M, Conley BA. Development and use of integral assays in clinical trials. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:1540-1546.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Sistare FD, Degeorge JJ. Applications of toxicogenomics to nonclinical drug development: regulatory science considerations. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;460:239-261.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  August J. Market watch: emerging companion diagnostics for cancer drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:351.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Matsui S. Genomic biomarkers for personalized medicine: development and validation in clinical studies. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:865980.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Novelli G, Ciccacci C, Borgiani P, Papaluca Amati M, Abadie E. Genetic tests and genomic biomarkers: regulation, qualification and validation. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2008;5:149-154.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  McDonagh EM, Whirl-Carrillo M, Garten Y, Altman RB, Klein TE. From pharmacogenomic knowledge acquisition to clinical applications: the PharmGKB as a clinical pharmacogenomic biomarker resource. Biomark Med. 2011;5:795-806.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 121]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 120]  [Article Influence: 10.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Angata T, Fujinawa R, Kurimoto A, Nakajima K, Kato M, Takamatsu S, Korekane H, Gao CX, Ohtsubo K, Kitazume S. Integrated approach toward the discovery of glyco-biomarkers of inflammation-related diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1253:159-169.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Ohta S, Taniguchi K, Arima K, Suzuki S, Shiraishi H, Masuoka M, Izuhara K. Establishment of novel biomarkers for Personalized medication for atopic dermatitis. Rinsho Byori. 2013;61:247-255.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Wadsworth SJ, Sandford AJ. Personalised medicine and asthma diagnostics/management. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13:118-129.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Popescu FD. Antisense- and RNA interference-based therapeutic strategies in allergy. J Cell Mol Med. 2005;9:840-853.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Burks AW, Calderon MA, Casale T, Cox L, Demoly P, Jutel M, Nelson H, Akdis CA. Update on allergy immunotherapy: American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & amp; Immunology/European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology/PRACTALL consensus report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:1288-96.e3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 331]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 320]  [Article Influence: 29.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Canonica GW, Bousquet J, Casale T, Lockey RF, Baena-Cagnani CE, Pawankar R, Potter PC, Bousquet PJ, Cox LS, Durham SR. Sub-lingual immunotherapy: World Allergy Organization Position Paper 2009. Allergy. 2009;64 Suppl 91:1-59.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 121]  [Article Influence: 8.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Petersen KD, Kronborg C, Larsen JN, Dahl R, Gyrd-Hansen D. Patient related outcomes in a real life prospective follow up study: Allergen immunotherapy increase quality of life and reduce sick days. World Allergy Organ J. 2013;6:15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Manzotti G, Lombardi C. Allergen immunotherapy as a drug: the new deal of grass allergen tablets from clinical trials to current practice. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;45:34-42.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Johansen P, von Moos S, Mohanan D, Kündig TM, Senti G. New routes for allergen immunotherapy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8:1525-1533.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Witten M, Malling HJ, Blom L, Poulsen BC, Poulsen LK. Is intralymphatic immunotherapy ready for clinical use in patients with grass pollen allergy? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132:1248-1252.e5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 78]  [Article Influence: 7.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Tourdot S, Airouche S, Berjont N, Moussu H, Betbeder D, Nony E, Bordas-Le Floch V, Baron-Bodo V, Mascarell L, Moingeon P. Efficacy of sublingual vectorized recombinant Bet v 1a in a mouse model of birch pollen allergic asthma. Vaccine. 2013;31:2628-2637.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 25]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Valenta R, Linhart B, Swoboda I, Niederberger V. Recombinant allergens for allergen-specific immunotherapy: 10 years anniversary of immunotherapy with recombinant allergens. Allergy. 2011;66:775-783.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 107]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 109]  [Article Influence: 8.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Jutel M, Solarewicz-Madejek K, Smolinska S. Recombinant allergens: the present and the future. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8:1534-1543.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Makatsori M, Pfaar O, Lleonart R, Calderon MA. Recombinant allergen immunotherapy: clinical evidence of efficacy--a review. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13:371-380.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Douladiris N, Savvatianos S, Roumpedaki I, Skevaki C, Mitsias D, Papadopoulos NG. A molecular diagnostic algorithm to guide pollen immunotherapy in southern Europe: towards component-resolved management of allergic diseases. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;162:163-172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Calderon MA, Demoly P, Gerth van Wijk R, Bousquet J, Sheikh A, Frew A, Scadding G, Bachert C, Malling HJ, Valenta R. EAACI: A European Declaration on Immunotherapy. Designing the future of allergen specific immunotherapy. Clin Transl Allergy. 2012;2:20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 75]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80]  [Article Influence: 6.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Bousquet J, Khaltaev N, Cruz AA, Denburg J, Fokkens WJ, Togias A, Zuberbier T, Baena-Cagnani CE, Canonica GW, van Weel C, Agache I, Aït-Khaled N, Bachert C, Blaiss MS, Bonini S, Boulet LP, Bousquet PJ, Camargos P, Carlsen KH, Chen Y, Custovic A, Dahl R, Demoly P, Douagui H, Durham SR, van Wijk RG, Kalayci O, Kaliner MA, Kim YY, Kowalski ML, Kuna P, Le LT, Lemiere C, Li J, Lockey RF, Mavale-Manuel S, Meltzer EO, Mohammad Y, Mullol J, Naclerio R, O’Hehir RE, Ohta K, Ouedraogo S, Palkonen S, Papadopoulos N, Passalacqua G, Pawankar R, Popov TA, Rabe KF, Rosado-Pinto J, Scadding GK, Simons FE, Toskala E, Valovirta E, van Cauwenberge P, Wang DY, Wickman M, Yawn BP, Yorgancioglu A, Yusuf OM, Zar H, Annesi-Maesano I, Bateman ED, Ben Kheder A, Boakye DA, Bouchard J, Burney P, Busse WW, Chan-Yeung M, Chavannes NH, Chuchalin A, Dolen WK, Emuzyte R, Grouse L, Humbert M, Jackson C, Johnston SL, Keith PK, Kemp JP, Klossek JM, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lipworth B, Malo JL, Marshall GD, Naspitz C, Nekam K, Niggemann B, Nizankowska-Mogilnicka E, Okamoto Y, Orru MP, Potter P, Price D, Stoloff SW, Vandenplas O, Viegi G, Williams D; World Health Organization; GA(2)LEN; AllerGen. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA2LEN and AllerGen). Allergy. 2008;63 Suppl 86:8-160.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2932]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3002]  [Article Influence: 187.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Schwindt CD, Settipane R. Allergic rhinitis (AR) is now estimated to affect some 1.4 billion people globally and continues to be on the rise. Editorial. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012;26 Suppl 1:S1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Domingo C, Moreno A, Mirapeix R. Rationale for the use of immunomodulatory therapies in the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) step V asthma other than oral glucocorticosteroids. Intern Med J. 2011;41:525-536.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Bousquet J, Schünemann HJ, Samolinski B, Demoly P, Baena-Cagnani CE, Bachert C, Bonini S, Boulet LP, Bousquet PJ, Brozek JL, Canonica GW, Casale TB, Cruz AA, Fokkens WJ, Fonseca JA, van Wijk RG, Grouse L, Haahtela T, Khaltaev N, Kuna P, Lockey RF, Lodrup Carlsen KC, Mullol J, Naclerio R, O’Hehir RE, Ohta K, Palkonen S, Papadopoulos NG, Passalacqua G, Pawankar R, Price D, Ryan D, Simons FE, Togias A, Williams D, Yorgancioglu A, Yusuf OM, Aberer W, Adachi M, Agache I, Aït-Khaled N, Akdis CA, Andrianarisoa A, Annesi-Maesano I, Ansotegui IJ, Baiardini I, Bateman ED, Bedbrook A, Beghé B, Beji M, Bel EH, Ben Kheder A, Bennoor KS, Bergmann KC, Berrissoul F, Bieber T, Bindslev Jensen C, Blaiss MS, Boner AL, Bouchard J, Braido F, Brightling CE, Bush A, Caballero F, Calderon MA, Calvo MA, Camargos PA, Caraballo LR, Carlsen KH, Carr W, Cepeda AM, Cesario A, Chavannes NH, Chen YZ, Chiriac AM, Chivato Pérez T, Chkhartishvili E, Ciprandi G, Costa DJ, Cox L, Custovic A, Dahl R, Darsow U, De Blay F, Deleanu D, Denburg JA, Devillier P, Didi T, Dokic D, Dolen WK, Douagui H, Dubakiene R, Durham SR, Dykewicz MS, El-Gamal Y, El-Meziane A, Emuzyte R, Fiocchi A, Fletcher M, Fukuda T, Gamkrelidze A, Gereda JE, González Diaz S, Gotua M, Guzmán MA, Hellings PW, Hellquist-Dahl B, Horak F, Hourihane JO, Howarth P, Humbert M, Ivancevich JC, Jackson C, Just J, Kalayci O, Kaliner MA, Kalyoncu AF, Keil T, Keith PK, Khayat G, Kim YY, Koffi N’goran B, Koppelman GH, Kowalski ML, Kull I, Kvedariene V, Larenas-Linnemann D, Le LT, Lemière C, Li J, Lieberman P, Lipworth B, Mahboub B, Makela MJ, Martin F, Marshall GD, Martinez FD, Masjedi MR, Maurer M, Mavale-Manuel S, Mazon A, Melen E, Meltzer EO, Mendez NH, Merk H, Mihaltan F, Mohammad Y, Morais-Almeida M, Muraro A, Nafti S, Namazova-Baranova L, Nekam K, Neou A, Niggemann B, Nizankowska-Mogilnicka E, Nyembue TD, Okamoto Y, Okubo K, Orru MP, Ouedraogo S, Ozdemir C, Panzner P, Pali-Schöll I, Park HS, Pigearias B, Pohl W, Popov TA, Postma DS, Potter P, Rabe KF, Ratomaharo J, Reitamo S, Ring J, Roberts R, Rogala B, Romano A, Roman Rodriguez M, Rosado-Pinto J, Rosenwasser L, Rottem M, Sanchez-Borges M, Scadding GK, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Sheikh A, Sisul JC, Solé D, Sooronbaev T, Spicak V, Spranger O, Stein RT, Stoloff SW, Sunyer J, Szczeklik A, Todo-Bom A, Toskala E, Tremblay Y, Valenta R, Valero AL, Valeyre D, Valiulis A, Valovirta E, Van Cauwenberge P, Vandenplas O, van Weel C, Vichyanond P, Viegi G, Wang DY, Wickman M, Wöhrl S, Wright J, Yawn BP, Yiallouros PK, Zar HJ, Zernotti ME, Zhong N, Zidarn M, Zuberbier T, Burney PG, Johnston SL, Warner JO; World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Asthma and Rhinitis. Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA): achievements in 10 years and future needs. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130:1049-1062.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 371]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 358]  [Article Influence: 29.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  D’Amato G, Cecchi L, Bonini S, Nunes C, Annesi-Maesano I, Behrendt H, Liccardi G, Popov T, van Cauwenberge P. Allergenic pollen and pollen allergy in Europe. Allergy. 2007;62:976-990.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 768]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 555]  [Article Influence: 32.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Scaparrotta A, Verini M, Consilvio NP, Cingolani A, Rapino D, Attanasi M, Cerasa M, Di Pillo S, Chiarelli F. Sensitization to timothy grass pollen allergenic molecules in children. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2013;8:17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Boehncke WH, Loeliger C, Kuehnl P, Kalbacher H, Böhm BO, Gall H. Identification of HLA-DR and -DQ alleles conferring susceptibility to pollen allergy and pollen associated food allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998;28:434-441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
35.  Freidhoff LR, Ehrlich-Kautzky E, Meyers DA, Ansari AA, Bias WB, Marsh DG. Association of HLA-DR3 with human immune response to Lol p I and Lol p II allergens in allergic subjects. Tissue Antigens. 1988;31:211-219.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
36.  Ansari AA, Freidhoff LR, Meyers DA, Bias WB, Marsh DG. Human immune responsiveness to Lolium perenne pollen allergen Lol p III (rye III) is associated with HLA-DR3 and DR5. Hum Immunol. 1989;25:59-71.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
37.  Ramasamy A, Curjuric I, Coin LJ, Kumar A, McArdle WL, Imboden M, Leynaert B, Kogevinas M, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Pekkanen J. A genome-wide meta-analysis of genetic variants associated with allergic rhinitis and grass sensitization and their interaction with birth order. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128:996-1005.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 184]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 145]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Inoue H, Mashimo Y, Funamizu M, Yonekura S, Horiguchi S, Shimojo N, Kohno Y, Okamoto Y, Hata A, Suzuki Y. Association of the MMP9 gene with childhood cedar pollen sensitization and pollinosis. J Hum Genet. 2012;57:176-183.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Till S. Mechanisms of immunotherapy and surrogate markers. Allergy. 2011;66 Suppl 95:25-27.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Soyer OU, Akdis M, Ring J, Behrendt H, Crameri R, Lauener R, Akdis CA. Mechanisms of peripheral tolerance to allergens. Allergy. 2013;68:161-170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 98]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 99]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Yalcin AD, Gumuslu S, Parlak GE, Bısgın A. Soluble trail as a marker of efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18:CR617-CR621.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
42.  Shamji MH, Ljørring C, Würtzen PA. Predictive biomarkers of clinical efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy: how to proceed. Immunotherapy. 2013;5:203-206.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Ciprandi G, Contini P, Pistorio A, Murdaca G, Puppo F. Sublingual immunotherapy reduces soluble HLA-G and HLA-A,-B,-C serum levels in patients with allergic rhinitis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009;9:253-257.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Ciprandi G, Fuchs D. Tryptophan, neopterin, and nitrite in allergy. Allergy. 2012;67:1083.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Popescu FD, Vieru M, Tudose AM. Evaluation of birch pollen sensitization profile in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis patients from Bucharest region using component-resolved diagnosis. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013;3 Suppl 2:3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Assing K, Bodtger U, Poulsen LK, Malling HJ. Grass pollen symptoms interfere with the recollection of birch pollen symptoms - a prospective study of suspected, asymptomatic skin sensitization. Allergy. 2007;62:373-377.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
47.  Passali D, Bellusi LM, Kern EB, Sarafoleanu C, Popescu FD. Genes, allergens and inflammation in allergic rhinitis. Bucharest: Editura Academiei Romane 2013; 101-167.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
48.  Davies JM, Li H, Green M, Towers M, Upham JW. Subtropical grass pollen allergens are important for allergic respiratory diseases in subtropical regions. Clin Transl Allergy. 2012;2:4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
49.  Thibaudon M, Caillaud D, Besancenot JP. [Methods of studying airborne pollen and pollen calendars]. Rev Mal Respir. 2013;30:463-479.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
50.  Galan C, Antunes C, Brandao R, Torres C, Garcia-Mozo H, Caeiro E, Ferro R, Prank M, Sofiev M, Albertini R. Airborne olive pollen counts are not representative of exposure to the major olive allergen Ole e 1. Allergy. 2013;68:809-812.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
51.  Cecchi L. From pollen count to pollen potency: the molecular era of aerobiology. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:898-900.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
52.  Tormo R, Silva I, Gonzalo A, Moreno A, Pérez R, Fernández S. Phenological records as a complement to aerobiological data. Int J Biometeorol. 2011;55:51-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
53.  Beggs PJ. Impacts of climate change on aeroallergens: past and future. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34:1507-1513.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
54.  Cecchi L, D’Amato G, Ayres JG, Galan C, Forastiere F, Forsberg B, Gerritsen J, Nunes C, Behrendt H, Akdis C. Projections of the effects of climate change on allergic asthma: the contribution of aerobiology. Allergy. 2010;65:1073-1081.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
55.  Couto M, Miranda M. Proposed GA2LEN standardized allergen battery: what about regional sensitization differences? J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21:491-492.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
56.  Weryszko-Chmielewska E, Piotrowska K. Airborne pollen calendar of Lublin, Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2004;11:91-97.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
57.  Puc M, Wolski T. Forecasting of the selected features of Poaceae (R. Br.) Barnh., Artemisia L. and Ambrosia L. pollen season in Szczecin, north-western Poland, using Gumbel’s distribution. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20:36-47.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
58.  Hallsdottir M. Birch pollen abundance in Reykjavik, Iceland. Grana. 1999;38:368-373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
59.  Izquierdo R, Belmonte J, Avila A, Alarcón M, Cuevas E, Alonso-Pérez S. Source areas and long-range transport of pollen from continental land to Tenerife (Canary Islands). Int J Biometeorol. 2011;55:67-85.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
60.  Aboulaich N, Achmakh L, Bouziane H, Trigo MM, Recio M, Kadiri M, Cabezudo B, Riadi H, Kazzaz M. Effect of meteorological parameters on Poaceae pollen in the atmosphere of Tetouan (NW Morocco). Int J Biometeorol. 2013;57:197-205.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
61.  Yazidi AA, Nejjari C, Bartal M. [Skin sensitization to pollens in Morocco. Multicenter study]. Rev Mal Respir. 2001;18:523-529.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
62.  Adeonipekun AP. Comparative Aeropalynology of Ota, Nigeria. J Ecol Natural Environ. 2012;4:314-320.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
63.  Prescott RA, Potter PC. Allergenicity and cross-reactivity of buffalo grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum). S Afr Med J. 2001;91:237-243.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
64.  Potter PC, Mather S, Lockey P, Ainslie G, Cadman A. IgE specific immune responses to an African grass (Kikuyu, Pennisetum clandestinum). Clin Exp Allergy. 1993;23:581-586.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
65.  Berman D. Pollen monitoring in South Africa. Current Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;20:184-187.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
66.  Waisel Y, Ganor E, Glikman M, Epstein V, Brenner S. Seasonal distribution of airborne pollen in the coastal plain of Israel. Aerobiologia. 1997;13:127-134.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
67.  Geller-Bernstein C, Waisel Y, Lahoz C. Environment and sensitization to cypress in Israel. Allerg Immunol (Paris). 2000;32:92-93.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
68.  Hasnain SM, Al-Frayh AR, Subiza JL, Fernández-Caldas E, Casanovas M, Geith T, Gad-El-Rab MO, Koshak E, Al-Mehdar H, Al-Sowaidi S. Sensitization to indigenous pollen and molds and other outdoor and indoor allergens in allergic patients from saudi arabia, United arab emirates, and Sudan. World Allergy Organ J. 2012;5:59-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
69.  Waibel KH. Allergic rhinitis in the Middle East. Mil Med. 2005;170:1026-1028.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
70.  Yalcin AD, Basaran S, Bisgin A, Polat HH, Gorczynski RM. Pollen aero allergens and the climate in Mediterranean region and allergen sensitivity in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma patients. Med Sci Monit. 2013;19:102-110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
71.  Abbas S, Katelaris CH, Singh AB, Raza SM, Ajab Khan M, Rashid M, Abbas M, Ismail M. World allergy organization study on aerobiology for creating first pollen and mold calendar with clinical significance in islamabad, pakistan; : a project of world allergy organization and pakistan allergy, asthma & clinical immunology centre of islamabad. World Allergy Organ J. 2012;5:103-110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
72.  Singh AB, Shahi S. Aeroallergens in clinical practice of allergy in India- ARIA Asia Pacific Workshop report. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2008;26:245-256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
73.  Li S, Yu Y, Ruan B, Liu B, Zhao X, Qiu J. [Prevalence of sensitization to aeroallergens in 1 893 patients with allergic rhinitis in Yunnan]. Linchung Erbi Yanhou Toujing Waike Zazhi. 2013;27:246-250.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
74.  Xiao X, Fu A, Xie X, Kang M, Hu D, Yang P, Liu Z. An investigation of airborne allergenic pollen at different heights. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;160:143-151.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
75.  Xu JX, Zhang DS, Li LH. Seasonal variations of airborne pollen in Beijing, China and their relationships with meteorological factors. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2012;32:202-208.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
76.  Hao GD, Zheng YW, Gjesing B, Kong XA, Wang JY, Song ZJ, Lai XX, Zhong NS, Spangfort MD. Prevalence of sensitization to weed pollens of Humulus scandens, Artemisia vulgaris, and Ambrosia artemisiifolia in northern China. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14:240-246.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
77.  Chung YJ, Cho IK, Lee KI, Bae SH, Lee JW, Chung PS, Mo JH. Seasonal Specificity of Seasonal Allergens and Validation of the ARIA Classification in Korea. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2013;5:75-80.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
78.  Oh JW, Lee HB, Kang IJ, Kim SW, Park KS, Kook MH, Kim BS, Baek HS, Kim JH, Kim JK. The revised edition of korean calendar for allergenic pollens. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2012;4:5-11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
79.  Miyahara S, Nakada M, Nishizaki K, Kawarai Y, Nishioka K, Hino H. Cross-reactivity to olive tree pollen and orchard grass pollen in patients with pollinosis. Acta Med Okayama. 1997;51:167-171.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
80.  Yabuhara A, Shimojima K, Hokura M, Ishida T, Kawai H. [Rice pollen asthma and pollinosis in childhood: seasonal asthma and allergic rhinoconjunctivitis during the period of rice pollen emission in the surrouding area of rice field]. Arerugi. 2004;53:494-501.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
81.  Makihara S, Okano M, Fujiwara T, Kimura M, Higaki T, Haruna T, Noda Y, Kanai K, Kariya S, Nishizaki K. Early interventional treatment with intranasal mometasone furoate in Japanese cedar/cypress pollinosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Allergol Int. 2012;61:295-304.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
82.  Honda K, Saito H, Fukui N, Ito E, Ishikawa K. The relationship between pollen count levels and prevalence of Japanese cedar pollinosis in Northeast Japan. Allergol Int. 2013;62:375-380.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
83.  Hirano K, Hino S, Oshima K, Okajima T, Nadano D, Urisu A, Takaiwa F, Matsuda T. Allergenic potential of rice-pollen proteins: expression, immuno-cross reactivity and IgE-binding. J Biochem. 2013;154:195-205.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
84.  Nakamaru Y, Maguchi S, Oridate N, Takagi D, Furuta Y, Fukuda S. Plantago lanceolata (English plantain) pollinosis in Japan. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2005;32:251-256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
85.  Wallace DV, Dykewicz MS, Bernstein DI, Blessing-Moore J, Cox L, Khan DA, Lang DM, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, Portnoy JM. The diagnosis and management of rhinitis: an updated practice parameter. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:S1-84.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 717]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 639]  [Article Influence: 39.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
86.  Creticos PS, Maloney J, Bernstein DI, Casale T, Kaur A, Fisher R, Liu N, Murphy K, Nékám K, Nolte H. Randomized controlled trial of a ragweed allergy immunotherapy tablet in North American and European adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:1342-9.e6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 121]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 122]  [Article Influence: 11.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
87.  Ziska L, Knowlton K, Rogers C, Dalan D, Tierney N, Elder MA, Filley W, Shropshire J, Ford LB, Hedberg C. Recent warming by latitude associated with increased length of ragweed pollen season in central North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:4248-4251.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 257]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 191]  [Article Influence: 14.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
88.  Van de Water PK, Keever T, Main CE, Levetin E. An assessment of predictive forecasting of Juniperus ashei pollen movement in the Southern Great Plains, USA. Int J Biometeorol. 2003;48:74-82.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
89.  Lewis WH, Dixit AB, Wedner HJ. Grass aeropollen of the western United States Gulf Coast. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1992;98:80-88.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
90.  Bucholtz GA, Lockey RF, Wunderlin RP, Binford LR, Stablein JJ, Serbousek D, Fernandez-Caldas E. A three-year aerobiologic pollen survey of the Tampa Bay area, Florida. Ann Allergy. 1991;67:534-540.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
91.  González-Díaz SN, Rodríguez-Ortiz PG, Arias-Cruz A, Macías-Weinmann A, Cid-Guerrero D, Sedo-Mejia GA. Atmospheric pollen count in Monterrey, Mexico. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010;31:341-348.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
92.  Hurtado I, Alson J. Air pollen dispersal in a tropical area. Aerobiologia. 1990;6:122-127.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
93.  Mardones P, Grau M, Araya J, Córdova A, Pereira I, Peñailillo P, Silva R, Moraga A, Aguilera-Insunza R, Yepes-Nuñez JJ. First annual register of allergenic pollen in Talca, Chile. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2013;41:233-238.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
94.  Ong EK, Singh MB, Knox RB. Seasonal distribution of pollen in the atmosphere of melbourne: an airborne pollen calendar. Aerobiologia. 1995;11:51-55.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
95.  Erbas B, Chang JH, Newbigin E, Dhamarge S. Modelling atmospheric concentrations of grass pollen using meteorological variables in Melbourne, Australia. Int J Environ Health Res. 2007;17:361-368.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
96.  Green BJ, Simpson RW, Dettmann ME. Assessment of airborne Asteraceae pollen in Brisbane, Australia. Aerobiologia. 2012;28:295-301.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
97.  Newnham RM, Fountain DW, Cornford CC, Forde MB. A national survey of airborne pollen and grass flowering in New Zealand, with implications for respiratory disorder. Aerobiologia. 1995;11:239-252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
98.  Wong C, Murray BG. Variable changes in genome size associated with different polyploid events in Plantago (Plantaginaceae). J Hered. 2012;103:711-719.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
99.  Hiller R, Laffer S, Harwanegg C, Huber M, Schmidt WM, Twardosz A, Barletta B, Becker WM, Blaser K, Breiteneder H. Microarrayed allergen molecules: diagnostic gatekeepers for allergy treatment. FASEB J. 2002;16:414-416.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
100.  Alessandri C, Zennaro D, Zaffiro A, Mari A. Molecular allergology approach to allergic diseases in the paediatric age. Ital J Pediatr. 2009;35:29.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
101.  Gadisseur R, Chapelle JP, Cavalier E. A new tool in the field of in-vitro diagnosis of allergy: preliminary results in the comparison of ImmunoCAP© 250 with the ImmunoCAP© ISAC. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49:277-280.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 4.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
102.  Rodríguez D, Davila I, Sánchez E, Barber D, Lorente F, Sánchez J. Relationship between airborne pollen counts and the results obtained using 2 diagnostic methods: allergen-specific immunoglobulin E concentrations and skin prick tests. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21:222-228.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
103.  Pomponi D, Bernardi ML, Liso M, Palazzo P, Tuppo L, Rafaiani C, Santoro M, Labrada A, Ciardiello MA, Mari A. Allergen micro-bead array for IgE detection: a feasibility study using allergenic molecules tested on a flexible multiplex flow cytometric immunoassay. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35697.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
104.  Ebo DG. Component-resolved allergy diagnosis: a new era? Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg. 2011;73:163-179.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
105.  Treudler R, Simon JC. Overview of component resolved diagnostics. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13:110-117.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 66]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
106.  Valenta R, Vrtala S, Ebner C, Kraft D, Scheiner O. Diagnosis of grass pollen allergy with recombinant timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1992;97:287-294.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
107.  Van Ree R, Driessen MN, Van Leeuwen WA, Stapel SO, Aalberse RC. Variability of crossreactivity of IgE antibodies to group I and V allergens in eight grass pollen species. Clin Exp Allergy. 1992;22:611-617.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
108.  Laffer S, Valenta R, Vrtala S, Susani M, van Ree R, Kraft D, Scheiner O, Duchene M. Complementary DNA cloning of the major allergen Phl p I from timothy grass (Phleum pratense); recombinant Phl p I inhibits IgE binding to group I allergens from eight different grass species. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1994;94:689-698.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
109.  Petersen A, Schramm G, Bufe A, Schlaak M, Becker WM. Structural investigations of the major allergen Phl p I on the complementary DNA and protein level. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;95:987-994.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
110.  Laffer S, Duchene M, Reimitzer I, Susani M, Mannhalter C, Kraft D, Valenta R. Common IgE-epitopes of recombinant Phl p I, the major timothy grass pollen allergen and natural group I grass pollen isoallergens. Mol Immunol. 1996;33:417-426.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
111.  Yli-Panula E, Takahashi Y, Rantio-Lehtimäki A. Comparison of direct immunostaining and electroimmunoassay for analysis of airborne grass-pollen antigens. Allergy. 1997;52:541-546.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
112.  Niederberger V, Laffer S, Fröschl R, Kraft D, Rumpold H, Kapiotis S, Valenta R, Spitzauer S. IgE antibodies to recombinant pollen allergens (Phl p 1, Phl p 2, Phl p 5, and Bet v 2) account for a high percentage of grass pollen-specific IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;101:258-264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
113.  Vrtala S, Fischer S, Grote M, Vangelista L, Pastore A, Sperr WR, Valent P, Reichelt R, Kraft D, Valenta R. Molecular, immunological, and structural characterization of Phl p 6, a major allergen and P-particle-associated protein from Timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen. J Immunol. 1999;163:5489-5496.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
114.  Andersson K, Lidholm J. Characteristics and immunobiology of grass pollen allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2003;130:87-107.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
115.  Ball T, Edstrom W, Mauch L, Schmitt J, Leistler B, Fiebig H, Sperr WR, Hauswirth AW, Valent P, Kraft D. Gain of structure and IgE epitopes by eukaryotic expression of the major Timothy grass pollen allergen, Phl p 1. FEBS J. 2005;272:217-227.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
116.  Rogerieux F, Godfrin D, Sénéchal H, Motta AC, Marlière M, Peltre G, Lacroix G. Modifications of Phleum pratense grass pollen allergens following artificial exposure to gaseous air pollutants (O(3), NO(2), SO(2)). Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2007;143:127-134.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
117.  Steinman H, Ruden S.  Native & recombinant allergen components: Allergy - Which allergens?. Allergy Resources International: Phadia AB 2008; 5-201.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
118.  Valdivia ER, Stephenson AG, Durachko DM, Cosgrove D. Class B beta-expansins are needed for pollen separation and stigma penetration. Sex Plant Reprod. 2009;22:141-152.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
119.  Tiwari R, Bhalla PL, Singh MB. Evaluation of molecular basis of cross reactivity between rye and Bermuda grass pollen allergens. Allergol Int. 2009;58:557-564.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
120.  Bullimore A, Swan N, Alawode W, Skinner M. A proteomic style approach to characterize a grass mix product reveals potential immunotherapeutic benefit. World Allergy Organ J. 2011;4:140-146.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
121.  Hatzler L, Panetta V, Lau S, Wagner P, Bergmann RL, Illi S, Bergmann KE, Keil T, Hofmaier S, Rohrbach A. Molecular spreading and predictive value of preclinical IgE response to Phleum pratense in children with hay fever. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130:894-901.e5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 176]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 172]  [Article Influence: 14.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
122.  Tripodi S, Frediani T, Lucarelli S, Macrì F, Pingitore G, Di Rienzo Businco A, Dondi A, Pansa P, Ragusa G, Asero R. Molecular profiles of IgE to Phleum pratense in children with grass pollen allergy: implications for specific immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:834-839.e8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 116]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 110]  [Article Influence: 8.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
123.  Sekerkova A, Polackova M, Striz I. Detection of Phl p 1, Phl p 5, Phl p 7 and Phl p 12 specific IgE antibodies in the sera of children and adult patients allergic to Phleum pollen. Allergol Int. 2012;61:339-346.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
124.  Focke-Tejkl M, Campana R, Reininger R, Lupinek C, Blatt K, Valent P, Pavkov-Keller T, Keller W, Valenta R. Dissection of the IgE and T-cell recognition of the major group 5 grass pollen allergen Phl p 5. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:836-845.e11.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
125.  Canis M, Gröger M, Becker S, Klemens C, Kramer MF. Recombinant marker allergens in diagnosis of patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis to tree and grass pollens. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011;25:36-39.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
126.  Smith PM, Avjioglu A, Ward LR, Simpson RJ, Knox RB, Singh MB. Isolation and characterization of group-I isoallergens from Bermuda grass pollen. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1994;104:57-64.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
127.  Kao SH, Su SN, Huang SW, Tsai JJ, Chow LP. Sub-proteome analysis of novel IgE-binding proteins from Bermuda grass pollen. Proteomics. 2005;5:3805-3813.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
128.  Mohapatra SS, Lockey RF, Shirley S. Immunobiology of grass pollen allergens. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2005;5:381-387.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
129.  Duffort O, Quintana J, Ipsen H, Barber D, Polo F. Antigenic similarity among group 1 allergens from grasses and quantitation ELISA using monoclonal antibodies to Phl p 1. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2008;145:283-290.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
130.  Asturias JA, Ibarrola I, Eraso E, Arilla MC, Martínez A. The major Platanus acerifolia pollen allergen Pla a 1 has sequence homology to invertase inhibitors. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003;33:978-985.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
131.  Gadermaier G, Dedic A, Obermeyer G, Frank S, Himly M, Ferreira F. Biology of weed pollen allergens. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2004;4:391-400.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
132.  Hecker J, Diethers A, Schulz D, Sabri A, Plum M, Michel Y, Mempel M, Ollert M, Jakob T, Blank S. An IgE epitope of Bet v 1 and fagales PR10 proteins as defined by a human monoclonal IgE. Allergy. 2012;67:1530-1537.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
133.  Rossi RE, Melioli G, Monasterolo G, Harwanegg C, Rossi L, Canonica GW, Passalacqua G. Sensitization profiles in polysensitized patients from a restricted geographical area: further lessons from multiplexed component resolved diagnosis. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;43:171-175.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
134.  Arilla MC, Ibarrola I, García R, de la Hoz B, Martínez A, Asturias JA. Quantification of the major allergen from cypress (Cupressus arizonica) pollen, Cup a 1, by monoclonal antibody-based ELISA. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2004;134:10-16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
135.  Aceituno E, Del Pozo V, Mínguez A, Arrieta I, Cortegano I, Cárdaba B, Gallardo S, Rojo M, Palomino P, Lahoz C. Molecular cloning of major allergen from Cupressus arizonica pollen: Cup a 1. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30:1750-1758.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
136.  Oberhuber C, Ma Y, Wopfner N, Gadermaier G, Dedic A, Niggemann B, Maderegger B, Gruber P, Ferreira F, Scheiner O. Prevalence of IgE-binding to Art v 1, Art v 4 and Amb a 1 in mugwort-allergic patients. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2008;145:94-101.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
137.  Calabozo B, Díaz-Perales A, Salcedo G, Barber D, Polo F. Cloning and expression of biologically active Plantago lanceolata pollen allergen Pla l 1 in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Biochem J. 2003;372:889-896.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
138.  Asero R, Mistrello G, Amato S, Villalta D. Monosensitization to a novel plane pollen allergen. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;44:167-169.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
139.  Vahedi F, Sankian M, Moghadam M, Mohaddesfar M, Ghobadi S, Varasteh AR. Cloning and expression of Che a 1, the major allergen of Chenopodium album in Escherichia coli. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;163:895-905.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
140.  Sastre J. Molecular diagnosis in allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40:1442-1460.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 163]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 169]  [Article Influence: 12.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
141.  Manduzio H, Fitchette AC, Hrabina M, Chabre H, Batard T, Nony E, Faye L, Moingeon P, Gomord V. Glycoproteins are species-specific markers and major IgE reactants in grass pollens. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012;10:184-194.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
142.  Ebo DG, Hagendorens MM, Bridts CH, De Clerck LS, Stevens WJ. Sensitization to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants and the ubiquitous protein profilin: mimickers of allergy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34:137-144.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
143.  Guilloux L, Morisset M, Codreanu F, Parisot L, Moneret-Vautrin DA. Peanut allergy diagnosis in the context of grass pollen sensitization for 125 patients: roles of peanut and cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants specific IgE. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2009;149:91-97.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 33]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
144.  Hauser M, Roulias A, Ferreira F, Egger M. Panallergens and their impact on the allergic patient. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2010;6:1.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 187]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 197]  [Article Influence: 14.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
145.  Scala E, Alessandri C, Palazzo P, Pomponi D, Liso M, Bernardi ML, Ferrara R, Zennaro D, Santoro M, Rasi C. IgE recognition patterns of profilin, PR-10, and tropomyosin panallergens tested in 3,113 allergic patients by allergen microarray-based technology. PLoS One. 2011;6:e24912.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
146.  Pellaton C, Perrin Y, Boudousquié C, Barbier N, Wassenberg J, Corradin G, Thierry AC, Audran R, Reymond C, Spertini F. Novel birch pollen specific immunotherapy formulation based on contiguous overlapping peptides. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013;3:17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
147.  Egger M, Mutschlechner S, Wopfner N, Gadermaier G, Briza P, Ferreira F. Pollen-food syndromes associated with weed pollinosis: an update from the molecular point of view. Allergy. 2006;61:461-476.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
148.  Pauli G, Metz-Favre C. [Cross reactions between pollens and vegetable food allergens]. Rev Mal Respir. 2013;30:328-337.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
149.  Letrán A, Espinazo M, Moreno F. Measurement of IgE to pollen allergen components is helpful in selecting patients for immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013;111:295-297.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 30]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
150.  Piconi S, Trabattoni D, Rainone V, Borgonovo L, Passerini S, Rizzardini G, Frati F, Iemoli E, Clerici M. Immunological effects of sublingual immunotherapy: clinical efficacy is associated with modulation of programmed cell death ligand 1, IL-10, and IgG4. J Immunol. 2010;185:7723-7730.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
151.  Allam JP, Stojanovski G, Friedrichs N, Peng W, Bieber T, Wenzel J, Novak N. Distribution of Langerhans cells and mast cells within the human oral mucosa: new application sites of allergens in sublingual immunotherapy? Allergy. 2008;63:720-727.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 123]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 125]  [Article Influence: 7.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
152.  Mascarell L, Lombardi V, Louise A, Saint-Lu N, Chabre H, Moussu H, Betbeder D, Balazuc AM, Van Overtvelt L, Moingeon P. Oral dendritic cells mediate antigen-specific tolerance by stimulating TH1 and regulatory CD4+ T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:603-9.e5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 105]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 104]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
153.  Moingeon P, Mascarell L. Induction of tolerance via the sublingual route: mechanisms and applications. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:623474.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
154.  Zimmer A, Bouley J, Le Mignon M, Pliquet E, Horiot S, Turfkruyer M, Baron-Bodo V, Horak F, Nony E, Louise A. A regulatory dendritic cell signature correlates with the clinical efficacy of allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:1020-1030.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 110]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 115]  [Article Influence: 9.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
155.  David C, Nance JP, Hubbard J, Hsu M, Binder D, Wilson EH. Stabilin-1 expression in tumor associated macrophages. Brain Res. 2012;1481:71-78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
156.  Teh BK, Yeo JG, Chern LM, Lu J. C1q regulation of dendritic cell development from monocytes with distinct cytokine production and T cell stimulation. Mol Immunol. 2011;48:1128-1138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 49]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
157.  Gianchecchi E, Delfino DV, Fierabracci A. Recent insights into the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in immunological tolerance and autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2013;12:1091-1100.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 172]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 195]  [Article Influence: 17.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
158.  Fujimura T, Okamoto Y, Taniguchi M. Therapeutic effects and biomarkers in sublingual immunotherapy: a review. J Allergy (Cairo). 2012;2012:381737.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
159.  Gri G, Piconese S, Frossi B, Manfroi V, Merluzzi S, Tripodo C, Viola A, Odom S, Rivera J, Colombo MP. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress mast cell degranulation and allergic responses through OX40-OX40L interaction. Immunity. 2008;29:771-781.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 270]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 284]  [Article Influence: 17.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
160.  Galli SJ, Grimbaldeston M, Tsai M. Immunomodulatory mast cells: negative, as well as positive, regulators of immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:478-486.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 547]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 581]  [Article Influence: 36.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
161.  Fujimura T, Okamoto Y. Antigen-specific immunotherapy against allergic rhinitis: the state of the art. Allergol Int. 2010;59:21-31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
162.  Ozdemir C, Kucuksezer UC, Akdis M, Akdis CA. Specific immunotherapy and turning off the T cell: how does it work? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;107:381-392.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
163.  Eiwegger T, Gruber S, Szépfalusi Z, Akdis CA. Novel developments in the mechanisms of immune tolerance to allergens. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2012;8:1485-1491.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
164.  Scadding GW, Shamji MH, Jacobson MR, Lee DI, Wilson D, Lima MT, Pitkin L, Pilette C, Nouri-Aria K, Durham SR. Sublingual grass pollen immunotherapy is associated with increases in sublingual Foxp3-expressing cells and elevated allergen-specific immunoglobulin G4, immunoglobulin A and serum inhibitory activity for immunoglobulin E-facilitated allergen binding to B cells. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40:598-606.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 79]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
165.  Fujimura T, Yonekura S, Taniguchi Y, Horiguchi S, Saito A, Yasueda H, Nakayama T, Takemori T, Taniguchi M, Sakaguchi M. The induced regulatory T cell level, defined as the proportion of IL-10(+)Foxp3(+) cells among CD25(+)CD4(+) leukocytes, is a potential therapeutic biomarker for sublingual immunotherapy: a preliminary report. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2010;153:378-387.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
166.  Bonvalet M, Moussu H, Wambre E, Ricarte C, Horiot S, Rimaniol AC, Kwok WW, Horak F, de Beaumont O, Baron-Bodo V. Allergen-specific CD4+ T cell responses in peripheral blood do not predict the early onset of clinical efficacy during grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42:1745-1755.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
167.  Luger EO, Fokuhl V, Wegmann M, Abram M, Tillack K, Achatz G, Manz RA, Worm M, Radbruch A, Renz H. Induction of long-lived allergen-specific plasma cells by mucosal allergen challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;124:819-26.e4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 73]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 79]  [Article Influence: 5.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
168.  Shamji MH, Ljørring C, Francis JN, Calderon MA, Larché M, Kimber I, Frew AJ, Ipsen H, Lund K, Würtzen PA. Functional rather than immunoreactive levels of IgG4 correlate closely with clinical response to grass pollen immunotherapy. Allergy. 2012;67:217-226.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 206]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 216]  [Article Influence: 18.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
169.  Fujimura T, Yonekura S, Horiguchi S, Taniguchi Y, Saito A, Yasueda H, Inamine A, Nakayama T, Takemori T, Taniguchi M. Increase of regulatory T cells and the ratio of specific IgE to total IgE are candidates for response monitoring or prognostic biomarkers in 2-year sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Japanese cedar pollinosis. Clin Immunol. 2011;139:65-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
170.  James LK, Shamji MH, Walker SM, Wilson DR, Wachholz PA, Francis JN, Jacobson MR, Kimber I, Till SJ, Durham SR. Long-term tolerance after allergen immunotherapy is accompanied by selective persistence of blocking antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127:509-516.e1-5.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 241]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 252]  [Article Influence: 19.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
171.  van de Veen W, Stanic B, Yaman G, Wawrzyniak M, Söllner S, Akdis DG, Rückert B, Akdis CA, Akdis M. IgG4 production is confined to human IL-10-producing regulatory B cells that suppress antigen-specific immune responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131:1204-1212.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 417]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 437]  [Article Influence: 39.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
172.  Rossi RE, Monasterolo G, Coco G, Silvestro L, Operti D. Evaluation of serum IgG4 antibodies specific to grass pollen allergen components in the follow up of allergic patients undergoing subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy. Vaccine. 2007;25:957-964.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
173.  Wigginton SJ, Furtado PB, Armour KL, Clark MR, Robins A, Emara M, Ghaemmaghami AM, Sewell HF, Shakib F. An immunoglobulin E-reactive chimeric human immunoglobulin G1 anti-idiotype inhibits basophil degranulation through cross-linking of FcepsilonRI with FcgammaRIIb. Clin Exp Allergy. 2008;38:313-319.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
174.  Cady CT, Powell MS, Harbeck RJ, Giclas PC, Murphy JR, Katial RK, Weber RW, Hogarth PM, Johnson S, Bonvini E. IgG antibodies produced during subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy mediate inhibition of basophil activation via a mechanism involving both FcgammaRIIA and FcgammaRIIB. Immunol Lett. 2010;130:57-65.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 67]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
175.  Fujisawa T, Nagao M, Hiraguchi Y, Hosoki K, Tokuda R, Usui S, Masuda S, Shinoda M, Hashiguchi A, Yamaguchi M. Biomarkers for allergen immunotherapy in cedar pollinosis. Allergol Int. 2009;58:163-170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
176.  Pilette C, Nouri-Aria KT, Jacobson MR, Wilcock LK, Detry B, Walker SM, Francis JN, Durham SR. Grass pollen immunotherapy induces an allergen-specific IgA2 antibody response associated with mucosal TGF-beta expression. J Immunol. 2007;178:4658-4666.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
177.  Aalberse R. The role of IgG antibodies in allergy and immunotherapy. Allergy. 2011;66 Suppl 95:28-30.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
178.  Baron-Bodo V, Horiot S, Lautrette A, Chabre H, Drucbert AS, Danzé PM, Sénéchal H, Peltre G, Galvain S, Zeldin RK. Heterogeneity of antibody responses among clinical responders during grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43:1362-1373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
179.  Kositz C, Schroecksnadel K, Grander G, Schennach H, Kofler H, Fuchs D. High serum tryptophan concentration in pollinosis patients is associated with unresponsiveness to pollen extract therapy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2008;147:35-40.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
180.  Ciprandi G, De Amici M, Tosca M, Fuchs D. Tryptophan metabolism in allergic rhinitis: the effect of pollen allergen exposure. Hum Immunol. 2010;71:911-915.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
181.  Kofler H, Kurz K, Grander G, Fuchs D. Specific immunotherapy normalizes tryptophan concentrations in patients with allergic rhinitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2012;159:416-421.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
182.  Gregori S, Tomasoni D, Pacciani V, Scirpoli M, Battaglia M, Magnani CF, Hauben E, Roncarolo MG. Differentiation of type 1 T regulatory cells (Tr1) by tolerogenic DC-10 requires the IL-10-dependent ILT4/HLA-G pathway. Blood. 2010;116:935-944.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 374]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 419]  [Article Influence: 29.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
183.  Shiroishi M, Kuroki K, Rasubala L, Tsumoto K, Kumagai I, Kurimoto E, Kato K, Kohda D, Maenaka K. Structural basis for recognition of the nonclassical MHC molecule HLA-G by the leukocyte Ig-like receptor B2 (LILRB2/LIR2/ILT4/CD85d). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:16412-16417.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
184.  Ciprandi G, De Amici M, Caimmi S, Marseglia A, Marchi A, Castellazzi AM, Marseglia G. Soluble serum HLA-G in children with allergic rhinitis and asthma. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2010;24:221-224.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
185.  Ciprandi G, Continia P, Fenoglio D, Sormani MP, Negrini S, Puppo F, Indiveri F. Relationship between soluble HLA-G and HLA-A,-B,-C serum levels, and interferon-gamma production after sublingual immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis. Hum Immunol. 2008;69:409-413.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
186.  Berent-Maoz B, Salemi S, Mankuta D, Simon HU, Levi-Schaffer F. TRAIL mediated signaling in human mast cells: the influence of IgE-dependent activation. Allergy. 2008;63:333-340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
187.  Fang Y, Larsson L, Bruhns P, Xiang Z. Apoptosis of mouse mast cells is reciprocally regulated by the IgG receptors FcγRIIB and FcγRIIIA. Allergy. 2012;67:1233-1240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
188.  Canonica GW, Ansotegui IJ, Pawankar R, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, van Hage M, Baena-Cagnani CE, Melioli G, Nunes C, Passalacqua G, Rosenwasser L. A WAO - ARIA - GA²LEN consensus document on molecular-based allergy diagnostics. World Allergy Organ J. 2013;6:17.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 284]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 265]  [Article Influence: 24.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]