Gender Differences in Attitudes Towards "Sleeping in Separate Rooms" in Response to Marital Conflict

Park, Jinhee; Youn, Gahyun

doi:10.5534/kja.2011.29.3.199

Korean J Androl. 2011 Dec;29(3):199-205. Korean.
Published online Dec 30, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.5534/kja.2011.29.3.199

Original Article

Gender Differences in Attitudes Towards "Sleeping in Separate Rooms" in Response to Marital Conflict

Jinhee Park and Gahyun Youn

Author information

Author notes

Copyright and License

- Department of Psychology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea.
Corresponding author (Email: ghyoun@chonnam.ac.kr )

Received August 29, 2011; Revised October 14, 2011; Accepted October 17, 2011.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine gender differences in attitudes towards sleeping in separate rooms (SSR) a means of dealing with marital conflict and to explore the reasons why participants agreed or disagreed with SSR.

Materials and Methods

Research participants were 616 married people (300 men, 316 women) aged 30 to 89 years and currently lived with their spouses in the same house. They were asked to assess their attitudes towards SSR using a Likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 10 (strongly agree). Two separate SSR questions were given to them: one for the respondents themselves and the other for couples in general.

Results

There were significant gender differences in attitudes towards SSR. Men generally disagreed with SSR, with a negligible difference between the two separate SSR cases (p>.05). However, women agreed with SSR, especially with the question about the respondents themselves (p<.01). The most frequent reason from agreeing with SSR was to alleviate conflict, while the most frequent reason for disagreeing was related to sexual issues, which showed significant gender differences.

Conclusions

Gender differences in attitudes towards the SSR were found, and the differences were examined in the context of social exchange theory. The limitation of this study was that the sexual interactive and communicative patterns of the couples who were sleeping in separate rooms were not explored.

Keywords

Gender differences; Marital conflicts; Sex; Sleeping in separate rooms

Tables

Table 1
Rate of agreement and disagreement with SSR by gender [unit: % (n)]

Click for larger image

Table 2
Rate of agreement with SSR for the respondent and in general [unit: n (%)]

Click for larger image

Table 3
Reasons foragreement) with SSR [unit: % (n)]

Click for larger image

Table 4
Reasons for disagreeing wtih SSR [unit: % (n)]

Click for larger image

References

1. Swanson LM, Arnedt JT, Rosekind MR, Belenky G, Balkin TJ, Drake C. Sleep disorders and work performance: findings from the 2008 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America poll. J Sleep Res 2011;20:487–494.
  PubMed
  
  CrossRef
1. Billmann SJ, Ware JC. Marital satisfaction of wives of untreated sleep apneic men. Sleep Med 2002;3:55–59.
  PubMed
  
  CrossRef
1. Troxel WM. It's more than sex: exploring the dyadic nature of sleep and implications for health. Psychosom Med 2010;72:578–586.
  PubMed
  
  CrossRef
1. Troxel WM, Robles TF, Hall M, Buysse DJ. Marital quality and the marital bed: examining the covariation between relationship quality and sleep. Sleep Med Rev 2007;11:389–404.
  PubMed
  
  CrossRef
1. Rosenblatt P. In: Two in a bed: the social system of couple bed sharing. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 2006.
1. Youn G. Marital and sexual conflicts in elderly Korean people. J Sex Marital Ther 2009;35:230–238.
  PubMed
  
  CrossRef
1. Park J, Youn G. Sleeping in separate rooms: Is it a good solution to marital conflicts for the middle-aged older couples?; Proceedings of the Korean Gerontological Society; Seoul, Korea. 2010. pp. 304.
1. Park J, Youn G. Jpn J Gerontol Suppl 2011;33
  abstract 263.
1. Cadorna E. Sexual perception and behavior: gender differences among married Ilocanos. Int J Behav Cog Educ Psychol Sci 2009;1:15–24.
1. Baumeister R. In: Social psychology and human sexuality. Philadelphia: Psychology Press; 2001. pp. 5-8.