Published online Sep 30, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.5.321
The effect of solvent evaporation of dentin adhesive on bonding efficacy
Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study is to evaluate bonding efficacy by means of measuring the effect of remained solvent on Degree of conversion(DC) and µTBS and FE-SEM examination.
Materials and Methods
Two 2-step total etching adhesives and two single-step self etching adhesives were used in this study. First, volume weight loss of 4 dentin adhesives were measured using weighting machine in process of time in normal conditions and calculate degree of evaporation (DE). Reaction/reference intensity ratio were measured using micro-Raman spectroscopy and calculate DC according to DE. Then 2 experimental groups were prepared according to air-drying methods (under, over) and control group was prepared to manufacturer's instruction. Total 12 groups were evaluated by means of micro tensile bond strength and FE-SEM examination.
Results
Degree of evaporation (DE) was increased as time elapsed but different features were observed according to the kind of solvents. Acetone based adhesive showed higher DE than ethanol and butanol based adhesive. Degree of conversion (DC) was increased according to DE except for S3 bond. In µTBS evaluation, bond strength was increased by additional air-drying. Large gaps and droplets were observed in acetone based adhesives by FE-SEM pictures.
Conclusions
Additional air-drying is recommended for single-step self etching adhesive but careful consideration is required for 2-step total etching adhesive because of oxygen inhibition layer. Evaporation method is carefully chose and applied according to the solvent type.
Figure 1
Flowchart of experiment.
Figure 2
Comparison of DE for each adhesive.
Figure 3
Comparison of DC for each adhesive according to DE.
Figure 4
Rea/Ref ratio of One-Step.
Figure 5
Rea/Ref ratio of XP bond.
Figure 6
Rea/Ref ratio of S3 bond.
Figure 7
Rea/Ref ratio of G bond.
Figure 8
*The same letters within graph are statistically not significant, *Error bar means SD.
µTBS of experimental group (2-step total etching adhesive).
Figure 9
*The same letters within graph are statistically not significant, *Error bar means SD.
µTBS of experimental group (single-step self etching adhesive).
Figure 10
Comparison of µTBS for each experimental group.
Figure 11
Incomplete hybrid layer was observed (between vertical arrow). Resin tags were poorly formed (R, composite resin; D, dentin).
One-Step under (×5,000).
Figure 12
Complete hybrid layer and uniform resin tags could be noticed (R, composite resin; D, dentin; HL, hybrid layer).
One-Step control (×5,000).
Figure 13
Resin tags were well formed but adhesive resin was not certain. Notice continuous gap between composite resin and dentin (oblique arrows)(R, composite resin; D, dentin).
One-Step over (×5,000).
Figure 14
Resin tags were well formed. The thickness of adhesive resin was 2-3 µm and clearly distinct (between vertical arrow)(R, composite resin; D, dentin; A, adhesive resin).
XP bond under (×5,000).
Figure 15
Complete hybrid layer and uniform resin tags could be noticed (R, composite resin; D, dentin; HL, hybrid layer).
XP bond control (×5,000).
Figure 16
Complete hybrid layer and uniform resin tags could be noticed. adhesive resin was thinner than under group (R, composite resin; D, dentin; HL, hybrid layer).
XP bond over (×5,000).
Figure 17
Hybrid layer was not certain but tight connection could be noticed. The small number of slender resin tags were observed (R, composite resin; D, dentin).
S3 bond under (×5,000).
Figure 18
The number of resin tags were slightly higher than under group but there was no clear difference between control and under group (R, composite resin; D, dentin).
S3 bond control (×5,000).
Figure 19
There was no clear difference between control and over group (R, composite resin; D, dentin).
S3 bond over (×5,000).
Figure 20
Large and continuous gap was formed (vertical arrows), droplets were formed in adhesive resin (oblique arrows) (R, composite resin; D, dentin; A, adhesive resin).
G bond under (×5,000).
Figure 21
Hybrid layer was not certain but tight connection could be noticed. The small number of resin tags were observed (R, composite resin; D, dentin).
G bond control (×5,000).
Figure 22
There was no clear difference between control and over group (R, composite resin; D, dentin).
G bond over (×5,000).
Table 1
Adhesives used in this study
Table 2
Experimental groups of 2-step total etching adhesive
Table 3
Experimental groups of single-step self etching adhesive
Table 4
Degree of evaporation (DE) of each adhesive (Mean ± SD, %)
Table 5
Degree of conversion (DC) of each adhesive (Mean ± SD, %)
Table 6
µTBS for each experimental group (Mean ± SD, MPa)
References
-
Kanca J. Effect of resin primer and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992;5:213–215.
-
-
Gwinnett AJ. Moist versus dry dentin: its effect on shear bond strength. Am J Dent 1992;5:127–129.
-
-
Kanca J. Improving bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1992;123:35–43.
-
-
Reis AF, Oliveria MT, Giannini M, de Goes MF, Rueggeberg FA. The effect of organic solvents on one-bottle adhesives' bond strength to enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28:700–706.
-
-
Graham Solomons TW, Fryhle CB. In: Organic chemistry. 8th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2004.
-
-
Jacobsen T, Finger WJ, Kanehira M. Air-drying time of self-etching adhesives vs bonding efficacy. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:387–392.
-
-
Furuse AY, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Effect of evaporation of solvents from one-step, self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:35–39.
-
-
Loguercio AD, Loeblein F, Cherobin T, Ogliari F, Piva E, Reis A. Effect of solvent removal on adhesive properties of simplified etch-and-rinse systems and on bond strengths to dry and wet dentin. J Adhes Dent 2009:213–219.
-
-
Yanagawa T, Finger WJ. Relationship between degree of polymerization of composite resin and bond strength to Gluma-treated dentin. Am J Dent 1994;7:157–160.
-
-
Zou Y, Armstrong SR, Jessop JL. Apparent conversion of adhesive resin in the hybrid layer, Part I: Identification of an internal reference for Raman spectroscopy and the effects of water storage. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;86(4):883–891.
-
-
Zou Y, Jessop JL, Armstrong SR. Apparent conversion of adhesive resin in the hybrid layer, Part II: In situ studies of the resin-dentin bond. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;89(2):355–362.
-
-
Choi KK. In: Adhesion and esthetic restoration. 1st edition. Myungmun publishing Co.; 2009.
-
-
Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Agree KA, Lee KW. Solvation of dried dentin matrix by water and other polar solvents. Am J Dent 2002;15:97–102.
-