Asian Oncol Nurs. 2015 Jun;15(2):114-122. Korean.
Published online Jun 30, 2015.
© 2015 Korean Oncology Nursing Society
Review

Trends of Studies Published in Asian Oncology Nursing, 2011~2014

Soo Hyun Kim,1 Min Young Kim,2 Sun-Hee Kim,3 Hye Kyung Kim,4 Insook Lee,5 Jiyeon Lee,6 Yun Hee Ham,7 and Eunjung Ryu8
    • 1Department of Nursing, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
    • 2College of Nursing, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
    • 3Seoul Women's College of Nursing, Seoul, Korea.
    • 4Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
    • 5Department of Nursing, Changwon National University, Changwon, Korea.
    • 6Eulji University, College of Nursing, Daejeon, Korea.
    • 7Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
    • 8Department of Nursing, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Received June 08, 2015; Revised June 26, 2015; Accepted June 26, 2015.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze and identify recent trends of published research in Asian Oncology Nursing (AON).

Methods

A total of 140 studies were analyzed using a tool developed by the researchers, focusing on research design, research subject, research themes, and type of interventions and outcome variables of experimental studies.

Results

AON lacked studies which were supported by research funds (27.9%), or used an experimental study design (10.0%). In particular, there were only 2 studies (1.4%) conducted with randomized controlled trials (RCT). Research subjects were various, including patients with cancer, family care givers, healthy population, and oncology nurses. Based on a framework of cancer control continuum, most studies addressed issues of the treatment phase, whereas few studies addressed issues of diagnosis, survivorship, or the end-of-life (EOL) phase. Regarding research themes, psychosocial nursing including quality of life, anxiety, and depression was most frequently reported. In the experimental studies, an education program was most frequently applied and psycho-social-spiritual variables and symptoms were most frequently used to evaluate the effects of the intervention.

Conclusion

The results suggest that further expansion of RCT and studies regarding diagnosis, survivorship, and EOL phases are needed. Also, our findings may contribute toward the development of a Korean oncology nursing research agenda.

Keywords
Oncology Nursing; Nursing Research; Trends

Tables

Table 3
Research Theme of Studies Performed in Cancer Patients (N=85)

Table 4
Research Theme in Studies Performed in Non-cancer Patients (N=27)

Table 5
Characteristics of the Experimental Researches (N=14)

Notes

This paper was supported by research funds of Korean Oncology Nursing Society in 2014.

References

    1. Korea Central Cancer Registry. Cancer facts and figures 2012. [Accessed Feb 23, 2015].
    1. Jun M, So HS, Choi KS, Chung BY, Ryu E, Lee DS, et al. Analysis of research papers published by three nursing journals to suggest the direction of Journal of Korean Oncology Nursing. J Korean Oncol Nurs 2011;11(2):163–170.
    1. Molassiotis A, Gibson F, Kelly D, Richardson A, Dabbour R, Ahmad AM, et al. A systematic review of worldwide cancer nursing research: 1994 to 2003. Cancer Nurs 2006;29:431–440.
    1. Oncology Nursing Society. Oncology Nursing Forum. [Accessed Feb 21, 2015].
    1. Chung BY, Yi MS, Choi EH. Trends of Nursing Research in the Journal of Oncology Nursing. J Korean Oncol Nurs 2008;8:61–66.
    1. Oh PJ. An integrative review of oncology nursing research in Korea: 2003-2008. J Korean Oncol Nurs 2010;10:80–87.
    1. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Control Continuum. [Accessed Mar 20, 2015].
    1. Doorenbos AZ, Berger AM, Brohard-Holbert C, Eaton L, Kozachik S, LoBiondo-Wood G, et al. 2008 ONS research priorities survey. Oncol Nurs Forum 2008;35(6):E100–E107.
    1. Shin HS, Hyun MS, Ku MO, Cho MO, Kim SY, Jeong JS, et al. Analysis of research paper in the Journal of Korean Academy of nursing-focused on research trends, intervention studies, and level of evidence in the research. J Korean Acad Nurs 2010;40(1):139–149.
    1. Choe MA, Kim NC, Kim KM, Kim SJ, Park KS, Byeon YS, et al. Trends in nursing research in Korea: research trends for studies published from the inaugural issue to 2010 in the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing and the Journals published by member societies under korean academy of nursing science. J Korean Acad Nurs 2014;44(5):484–494.
    1. Wallin L. Knowledge translation and implementation research in nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 2009;46:576–587.
    1. Lee EH, Chung BY, Chun N, Oh PJ, Cho SY. Prioritization of research topics of korean oncology nurses. Asian Oncol Nurs 2013;13(4):259–303.
    1. LoBiondo-Wood G, Knobf MT, Mallory G, Von Ah D. Priorities for oncology nursing research: The 2013 national survey. Oncol Nurs Forum 2014;41(1):67–76.
    1. Oncology Nursing Society. The 2009-2013 Research Agenda for Oncology Nursing. Oncol Nurs Forum 2009;36(5):E274–E282.

Metrics
Share
Tables

1 / 5

PERMALINK