Published April 9, 2021 | Version 1.0
Dataset Open

NOAA RESTORE Science Program: Shellfish Portfolio Assessment Tool: Expert judgment of oyster resources for ecosystem services, 2018-07-01 to 2018-11-30

  • 1. Mississippi State University
  • 2. University of Illinois
  • 3. University of South Alabama
  • 4. Auburn University
  • 1. Mississippi State University
  • 2. Auburn University
  • 3. US DOC; NOAA; NOS; NCCOS; RESTORE Science Program
  • 4. US DOC; NOAA; NOS; National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)

Description

Dataset consists of observations of subject matter expert responses regarding levels of five ecosystem services provided by three distinct oyster resources under twelve distinct scenarios according to varying environmental conditions in U.S. Gulf and Atlantic Coast locations.

The purpose of the dataset is to provide useful comparisons across oyster resources of both expected ecosystem service delivery levels and the amount of variation in those levels. These estimates bridge an information gap regarding relative performance of diverse oyster resources along multiple dimensions and should serve as a useful guide for resource managers facing competing interests.

The project is an interdisciplinary effort to better understand ecosystem services provided by diverse oyster resources.  It is a partnership between Mississippi State University, Auburn University, Dauphin Island Sea Lab, and the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources.

See Petrolia et al. (2020).

Notes

The data in this accession were funded by the NOAA National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS) RESTORE Science Program under award NA17NOS4510090 to Mississippi State University. This work was also supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture and the Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station via Multistate Project W-4133 "Costs and Benefits of Natural Resources on Public and Private Lands: Management, Economic Valuation, and Integrated Decision-Making", (Hatch Project MIS-033140). Total File Size: 279 KB total (unzipped), 3 files in 1 folder, 219 KB (zipped) Data File Format(s): Comma-separated value (.CSV) Data File Compression: N/A Data File Resolution: N/A GIS Projection: N/A Data File: • Ecosystem_Service_Expert_Responses.csv Documentation Files: • BrowseGraphic.JPG • DataDocumentation.PDF Table 1: Data Dictionary Note: Summary statistics by ecosystem service, oyster resource, elicitation subsample, and environmental scenario. Scenario key: • 1st letter indicates nutrients-oxygen regime: mesotrophic-normoxic (M) or eutrophic-hypoxic (E); • 2nd letter indicates sedimentation regime: normal (N) or high (H); • 3rd letter indicates salinity regime: low (L), medium (M), or high(H). Column Variable Definition Units Range 1 Service Ecosystem service indicated (see Petrolia et al. 2020) N/A (descriptive) Oysters, Nitrogen, Erosion, Blue Crab, Redfish 2 Resource Oyster Resource indicated (see Petrolia et al. 2020) N/A (descriptive) Traditional, Off-Bottom, Restored 3 Subsample Subsample indicated (see Petrolia et al. 2020) N/A (descriptive) All, Isolated, Discussion, Gulf, Atlantic 4 Scenario Scenario indicated (see Petrolia et al. 2020) N/A (descriptive) MNL, MNM, MNH, MHL, MHM, MHH, ENL, ENM, ENH, EHL, EHM, EHH 5 N Number of observations number of respondents [3,38] 6 Mean Mean ecosystem service level reported varies by service (see Petrolia et al. 2020) [-0.11,712.5] 7 StdDev Standard deviation of ecosystem service levels reported varies by service (see Petrolia et al. 2020) [0,1654] 8 Wtd_Mean Familiarity-weighted mean ecosystem service level reported varies by service (see Petrolia et al. 2020) [-0.14,782] 9 Median Median ecosystem service level reported varies by service (see Petrolia et al. 2020) [0,300] 10 Min Minimum ecosystem service level reported varies by service (see Petrolia et al. 2020) [-5,20] 11 Max Maximum ecosystem service level reported varies by service (see Petrolia et al. 2020) [0,5000]

Files

RESTORE-Petrolia_EcosystemServices_ArchiveDataPackage.zip

Files (225.5 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Petrolia, D.R., F. Nyanzu, J. Cebrian, A. Harri, J. Amato, and W.C. Walton. 2020. Eliciting Expert Judgment to Inform Management of Diverse Oyster Resources for Multiple Ecosystem Services. Journal of Environmental Management 268 (August): 110676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110676