Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published December 31, 2009 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Integrative taxonomy identifies new (and old) species in the Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tegulare (Robertson) species group (Hymenoptera, Halictidae)

Creators

Description

Gibbs, Jason (2009): Integrative taxonomy identifies new (and old) species in the Lasioglossum (Dialictus) tegulare (Robertson) species group (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). Zootaxa 2032: 1-38, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.186301

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FFF0FFB0FFAAFFA3FF8BFFCAFFC7FF9F
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/FFF0FFB0FFAAFFA3FF8BFFCAFFC7FF9F

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5696356 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987C8FFA6FFAFFF1CFC57FD0CFA62 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5696358 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987C8FFA6FFB2FF1CF99DFCA2F909 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5696360 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987C8FFBBFFB6FF1CF925FE04FCF5 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.5696362 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987C8FFBFFFBBFF1CFC0EFC72FC83 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.3501991 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:6E7AE2AA-0B1D-4A64-8129-D5D37716958E (LSID)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987C8FFB2FFB8FF1CFCBCFB0DFC28 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.3501985 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:245CFA4D-1097-4FEF-945F-610889D3B731 (LSID)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987C8FFB1FFBFFF1CFBDBFC3EF8F2 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186302 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186303 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186304 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186305 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/DF1F6656FFA3FFAAFF1CF9B1FB8AF946 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186306 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186307 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186308 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186309 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186310 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186311 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186312 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.186313 (DOI)
Is source of
Dataset: http://www.gbif.org/dataset/44ea90b8-5ebe-475f-a98b-cfdc3a2b9c4f (URL)

References

  • Ascher, J. S. et al. (2008) Apoidea species guide. Available from http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/ 20q?guide=Apoidea_species (accessed 31 December 2008)
  • Avise, J.C. (2000) Phylogeography: the History and Formation of Species. Harvard University Press, Boston, Massachusetts, viii + 447 pp.
  • Avise, J.C. (2004) Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Springer, New York, New York, 684 pp.
  • Brady, S.G., Sipes, S., Pearson A. & Danforth, B.N. (2006) Recent and simultaneous origins of eusociality in halictid bees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 273, 1643-1649.
  • Buchmann, S.L. & Nabhan, G.P. (1996) The Forgotten Pollinators. Island Press, Washington, DC, xx + 292 pp.
  • Campbell, J.W., Hanula, J.L. & Waldrop, T.A. (2007) Effects of prescribed fire and fire surrogates on floral visiting insects of the blue ridge province in North Carolina. Biological Conservation, 134, 393-404.
  • Carman, G.M. & Packer, L. (1997) A cryptic species allied to Halictus ligatu s Say (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) detected by allozyme electrophoresis. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 69,168-176.
  • Danforth, B.N., Mitchell, P.L. & Packer L. (1998) Mitochondrial DNA differentiation between two cryptic Halictus (Hymenoptera : Halictidae) species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 91, 387-391.
  • Danforth, B.N., Sauquet, H. & Packer, L. (1999) Phylogeny of the bee genus Halictus (Hymenoptera; Halictidae) based on parsimony and likelihood analyses of nuclear EF-1 alpha sequence data. Molecular phylogenetics and Evolution, 13, 605-618.
  • Danforth, B.N., Conway, L. & Ji, S.Q. (2003) Phylogeny of eusocial Lasioglossum reveals multiple losses of eusociality within a primitively eusocial clade of bees (Hymenoptera : Halictidae). Systematic Biology, 52, 23-36.
  • Dayrat, B. (2005) Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 85, 407-415.
  • DeSalle, R. (2005) Species discovery versus species identification in DNA barcoding efforts: response to Rubinoff. Conservation Biology, 20, 1545-1547.
  • DeSalle, R., Egan, M.G. & Siddall, M. (2005) The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation, and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B-Biological Science, 360, 1905-1916.
  • Eickwort, G.C. (1988) Distribution patterns and biology of West Indian sweat bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). In: Liebherr, J.K. (Ed.), Zoogeography of Caribbean Insects. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 231-253.
  • Farris, J.S. (1977) On the phenetic approach to vertebrate classification. In: Hecht, M.K., Goody, P., & Hecht, B.M. (Eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. Plenum, New York, pp. 823-850.
  • Farris, J.S. (1983) The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In: Platnick, N.I. & Funk, V.A. (Eds.), Advances in Cladistics 2. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 7-36.
  • Folmer O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 294-299.
  • Funk, D.J. & Omland, K.E. (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 34, 397-423.
  • Gaston, K. J. & O'Neill, M.A. (2004) Automated species identification: why not? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Science, 359, 655-667.
  • Gibbs, J. & Packer, L. (2006) Revision and phylogenetic analysis of Chilicola sensu stricto (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) with the description of a new species. Zootaxa, 1355, 1-37.
  • Giles, V. & Ascher, J.S. (2006) A survey of the bees of the Black Rock Forest Preserve, New York (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 15, 208-231.
  • Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S. & Nixon, K. (2003a) T.N.T.: Tree analysis using new technology. Program and documentation available from the authors and at www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny (last accessed 31 December 2008)
  • Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., Kallersjo, M., Oxelman, B., Ramirez, M.J. & Szumik, C.A. (2003b) Improvements to resampling measures of group support. Cladistics, 19, 324-332.
  • Graenicher, S. (1927) Bees of the genus Halictus from Miami, Florida. Psyche, 34, 203- 208.
  • Grixti, J.C. & Packer, L. (2006) Changes in the bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of an old field site in southern Ontario, revisited after 34 years. The Canadian Entomologist, 138, 147-164.
  • Hastings, J.M., Schultheis, P.J., Whitson, M.K., Holliday, C.W., Coelho, J.R. & Mendell, A.M. (2008) DNA barcoding of New World cicada killers (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae). Zootaxa, 1713, 27-28.
  • Harris, R.A. (1979) A glossary of surface sculpturing. Occasional Papers in Entomology, 28, 1-31.
  • Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., & deWaard, J.R. (2003a) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 270, 313-321.
  • Hebert P.D.N., Ratnasingham S., & deWaard, J.R. (2003b) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Science, 270, S96-S99.
  • Hebert, P.D.N., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H. & Hallwachs, W. (2004) Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 14812-14817.
  • Hillis, D.M. (1987) Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18, 23-42.
  • Hillis, D.M. & Wiens, J.J. (2000) Molecules versus morphology in systematics: conflicts, artifacts, and misconceptions. In: Wiens, J.J. (Ed.) Phylogenetic Analysis of Morphological Data. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 1-19.
  • Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. (2001) MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, 17, 754-755.
  • Hull, D.L. (1988) Science as a Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, xiii + 586 pp.
  • Janjic, J. & Packer, L. (2001) New descriptions of Halictus (Seladonia) from the New World (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 10, 55-75.
  • Kimura, M. (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 16, 111-120.
  • Klein, A.M., Vaissiere, B., Cane, J.H., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Cunningham, S.A., Kremen C. & Tscharntke, T. (2007) Importance of crop pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 274, 303-313.
  • Knerer, G. & Atwood, C.E. (1962) An annotated checklist of the non-parasitic Halictidae (Hymenoptera) of Ontario. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 92, 160-176,
  • Knerer, G. & Atwood, C.E. (1966) Additional descriptions in the genus Dialictus Robertson (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 98, 881-887.
  • MacKay, P.A. & Knerer, G. (1979) Seasonal occurrence and abundance in a community of wild bees from an old field habitat in southern Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist, 111, 367-376.
  • Meyer, C.P. & Paulay, G. (2005) DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology, 3, 2229-2238.
  • Michener, C.D. (1951) Superfamily Apoidea. In: Muesebeck, C.F., Krombein, K.V. & Townes, H.K. (Eds.), Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. USDA Agriculture Monograph No. 2. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. pp. 1043-1255.
  • Michener, C.D. (1974) The Social Behavior of the Bees. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, xii + 404 pp.
  • Michener, C.D. (2007) The Bees of the World, 2nd Ed. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, xvi + 953 pp.
  • Miller, S.E. (2007) DNA barcoding and the renaissance of taxonomy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 4775-4776.
  • Mitchell, T.B. (1960) Bees of the Eastern United States: volume I. N.C. Agricultural Experimental Station Technical Bulletin, 141, 1-538.
  • Moure, J.S. & Hurd, P.D., Jr. (1987) An Annotated Catalog of the Halictid Bees of the Western Hemisphere (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C, vii + 405 pp.
  • Murao, R. & Tadauchi, O. (2007) A revision of the subgenus Evylaeus of the genus Lasioglossum in Japan (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) part I. Esakia, 47, 169-254.
  • Packer, L. (1993) Multiple-foundress associations in sweat bees. In: Keller, L. (Ed.), Queen Number and Sociality in Insects. Oxford University Press, New York, 214-233 pp.
  • Packer, L. (1997) The relevance of phylogenetic systematics to biology: Examples from medicine and behavioural ecology. Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 173, 11-29.
  • Packer, L. (1999) The distribution of Halictus ligatus Say and H. poeyi Lep. (Hymenoptera; Halictidae) in North America. In: Byers, G.W.R., Hagen, R.H., & Brooks, R.W. (Eds.), Entomological Contributions in Memory of Byron A. Alexander. University of Kansas Nature History Museum Special Publication, 24, pp. 81-84.
  • Packer, L. & Taylor, J.S. (1997) How many hidden species are there? An application of the phylogenetic species concept to genetic data for some comparatively well known bee "species". The Canadian Entomologist, 129, 587-594.
  • Padial, J.M. & De La Riva, I. (2007) Integrative taxonomists should use and produce DNA barcodes, Zootaxa, 1586, 67-68.
  • Page, T.J., Choy, S.C. & Hughes, J.M. (2005) The taxonomic feedback loop: symbiosis of morphology and molecules. Biology Letters, 1, 139-142.
  • Pilgrim, E.K. & Pitts, J.P. (2006) A molecular method for associating the dimorphic sexes of velvet ants (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 79, 222-230.
  • Prendini, L. (2005) Comment on "Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes". Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 498-504.
  • Pyle, R.L., Earle, J.L. & Greene, B.D. (2007) Five new species of the damselfish genus Chromis (Perciformes: Labroidei: Poacentridae) from deep coral reefs in the tropical western Pacific. Zootaxa, 1671, 3-31.
  • Ratnasingham, S. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2007) BOLD: the barcoding of life data system (www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 355-364.
  • Robertson, C. (1890) New North American bees of the genera Halictus and Prosopis. Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 17, 315-318.
  • Robertson, C. (1902) Synopsis of Halictinae. The Canadian Entomologist, 34, 243-250.
  • Rubinoff, D., Cameron, S. & Will, K. (2006) A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for "barcoding" identification. Journal of Heredity, 97, 581-594.
  • Sandhouse, G.A. (1924) New North American species of bees belonging to the genus Halictus (Chloralictus). Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 65, 1-43.
  • Sheffield, C.S. & Westby, S.M. (2007) The male of Megachile nivalis Friese, with an updated key to members of the subgenus Megachile s. str. (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in North America. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 16, 178- 191.
  • Skevington, J.H., Kehlmaier, C. & Stahls, G. (2007) DNA barcoding: mixed results for big-headed flies (Diptera: Pipunculidae). Zootaxa, 1423, 1-26.
  • Smith, M.A., Woodley. N.E., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2006) DNA barcodes reveal cryptic hostspecificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 3657-3662.
  • Smith, M.A., Wood, D.M., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2007) DNA barcodes affirm that 16 species of apparently generalist tropical parasitoid flies (Diptera, Tachinidae) are not all generalists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 4967-4972.
  • Smith, M., Rodriguez, J.J., Whitfield, J.B., Deans, A.R., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P.D.N. (2008) Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 12359-12364.
  • Song, H., Buhay, J.E., Whiting, M.F. & Crandall, K.A. (2008) Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 13486-13491.
  • Toro, H. & Moldenke, A. (1979) Revision de los Xeromelissinae Chilenos (Hymenoptera - Colletidae). Anales del Museo de Historia Natural de Valparaiso, 12, 95-182
  • Trewick, S.A. (2008) DNA barcoding is not enough: mismatch of taxonomy and genealogy in New Zealand grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Cladistics, 24, 240-254.
  • Van Nieukerken, E.J. (2007) Acalyptris Meyrick : revision of the platani and staticis groups in Europe and the Meditterranean (Lepidotera: Nepticulidae). Zootaxa, 1436, 1-48.
  • Viereck, H.L. (1916) The Hymenoptera, or wasp-like insects of Connecticut. Connecticut State Geological and Natural History Survey Bulletin, 22, 1-824, pls. I-X.
  • Wahlberg, N., Braby, M.F., Brower, A.V.Z., de Jong, R., Lee, M.-M., Nylin, S., Pierce, N.E., Sperling, F.A.H., Vila, R., Warren, A.D. & Zakharov, E. (2005) Synergistic effects of combining morphological and molecular data in resolving the phylogeny of butterflies and skippers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 272, 1577-1586.
  • Wheeler, Q.D. (2008) Undisciplined thinking: morphology and Hennig's unfinished revolution. Systematic Entomology, 33, 2-7.
  • Wheeler, W.M. (1928) The Social Insects: Their Origin and Evolution, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co., Ltd. London, xviii + 378 pp.
  • Witt, J.D.S., Threloff, D.L. & Hebert., P.D.N. (2006) DNA barcoding reveals extraordinary cryptic diversity in an amphipod genus: implications for desert spring conservation. Molecular Ecology, 15, 3073-3082.
  • Yanega, D. (1997) Demography and sociality in halictine bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). In: Choe, J.C. & B.J. Crespi (Eds.), The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K, pp. 293- 315.
  • Yassin, A., Cappy, P., Madi-Ravazzi, L., Ogereau, D. & David, J.R. (2007) DNA barcode discovers two cryptic species and two geographical radiations in the invasive drosophilid Zaprionus indianus. Molecular Ecology Notes, 8, 491-501.
  • Zayed, A., Roubik, D.W. & Packer, L. (2004) Use of diploid male frequency data as an indicator of pollinator decline. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (Suppl), 271, S9-S12.