Abstract
Probability discounting describes how the subjective value of an outcome changes because its delivery is uncertain. Although many legal decisions involve probability discounting, it has not been systematically studied. Participants were recruited to complete a probability-discounting task that assessed two legal (i.e., murder & embezzlement) and two non-legal (winning a sweepstakes & receiving medical treatment) hypothetical scenarios. They also completed several measures to assess attitudes related to legal issues. Different rates of discounting were observed across the four scenarios. Factor analysis indicated that discounting of the legal scenarios loaded onto a different factor than one of the non-legal scenarios (with the other cross loading on both). Only the participants’ estimation of what constituted reasonable doubt was a reliable predictor of their rates of discounting of the legal outcomes. The present results have a number of potential social implications, both for the study of probability discounting and the understanding of legal decision-making. They also highlight the need for more experimental research on overt behavior.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bibas, S. (2004). Plea bargaining outside the shadow of trial. Harvard Law Review, 117, 2463–2547. Retrieved from https://doi.org/wwwgo.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA118747144&v=2.1&u=undl_law&it=r&p=LT&sw=w
Bickel, W. K., Jones, B. A., Landes, R. D., Christensen, D. R., Jackson, L., & Mancino, M. (2010). Hypothetical intertemporal choice and real economic behavior: Delay discounting predicts voucher redemptions during contingency-management procedures. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 18, 546–552.
Butler, B., & Moran, G. (2007). The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venire persons’ evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 57–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.734
Cattell, R. B. (1966). In Cattell R. B. (Ed.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology Rand McNally: Chicago. Retrieved from https://doi.org/wwwezproxy.library.und.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1966-35009-000&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 771–791. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.771
Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 622–727. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622
Dhami, M. K. (2008). On measuring quantitative interpretations of reasonable doubt. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(4), 353–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013344
Edkins, V. A. (2011). Defense attorney plea recommendations and client race: Does zealous representation apply equally to all? Law and Human Behavior, 35, 413–425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9254-0
Estle, S.J., Green, L., Myerson, J., & Holt, D.D. (2006). Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses. Memory & Cognition, 34, 914–928.
Greene, E. & Heilbrun, K. (2011). Wrightman’s psychology and the legal system. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769
Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 418–427. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.418
Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 329–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016433
Hollander-Blumhoff, R. (1997). Getting to “guilty”: Plea bargaining as negotiation. Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 2, 115–148.
Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129–146.
Kramer, G. M., Wolbransky, M., & Heilbrun, K. (2007). Plea bargaining recommendations by criminal defense attorneys: Evidence strength, potential sentence, and defendant preference. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25, 573–585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.759
Lawyer, S. R., Schoepflin, F., Green, R., & Jenks, C. (2011). Discounting of hypothetical and potentially real outcomes in nicotine-dependent and nondependent samples. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 19, 263–274.
Lecci, L., & Myers, B. (2008). Individual differences in attitudes relevant to juror decision making: Development and validation of the pretrial juror attitude questionnaire (PJAQ). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 2010–2038. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00378.x
Locey, M. L., Jones, B. A., & Rachlin, H. (2011). Real and hypothetical rewards in self-control and social discounting. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 522–564.
Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). In Madden G. J., Bickel W. K. (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/12069-000
Martin, T. A., & Cohn, E. S. (2004). Attitudes toward the criminal legal system: Scale development and predictors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 367–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160310001629265
Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value. (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale, NJ England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Retrieved from https://doi.org/wwwezproxy.library.und.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1986-98701-003&site=ehost-live&scope=site
McAllister, H. A. (2008). Plea bargaining. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology and law: Vol. 2. (pp. 559–561), Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Retrieved from https://doi.org/wwwcatdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0723/2007029845.html
McAllister, H. A., & Bregman, N. J. (1986). Plea bargaining by prosecutors and defense attorneys: A decision theory approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 686–690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.4.686
Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 235–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235
Odum, A. L. (2011). Delay discounting: Trait variable? Behavioural Processes, 87, 1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.007
Odum, A. L., & Rainaud, C. P. (2003). Discounting of delayed hypothetical money, alcohol, and food. Behavioural Processes, 64, 305–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00145-1
Pearce, D., Groom, B., Hepburn, C., & Koundouri, P. (2003). Valuing the future: Recent advances in social discounting. World Economics, 4, 121–141.
Petry, N. M., & Madden, G. J. (2010). Discounting and pathological gambling. In G. J. Madden, W. K. Bickel, G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. (pp. 273–294). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/12069-010
Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2008). Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: A comparison of tasks and modes. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 940–953. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.4.940
Sweeney, L. T., & Haney, C. (1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10, 179–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370100204
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/wwwezproxy.library.und.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2006-03883-000&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Thaler, R.H. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economic Letters, 8, 201–207.
Weatherly, J. N., Derenne, A., & Terrell, H. K. (2011). Testing the reliability of delay discounting of ten commodities using the fill-in-the-blank method. The Psychological Record, 61, 113–126. Retrieved from https://doi.org/wwwezproxy.library.und.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2011-20531-007&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Weatherly, J. N., Plumm, K. M., & Derenne, A. (2011). Delay discounting and social policy issues. The Psychological Record, 61, 527–546. Retrieved from https://doi.org/wwwezproxy.library.und.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2011-23300-002&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Weatherly, J. N., & Terrell, H. K. (2011). Delay discounting of different commodities II: Confirmatory analyses. Journal of General Psychology, 138, 35–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2010.532522
Weatherly, J. N., Terrell, H. K., & Derenne, A. (2010). Delay discounting of different commodities. Journal of General Psychology, 137, 273–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2010.484449
Williams, J. (2010). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and discounting: Multiple minor traits and states. In G. J. Madden, W. K. Bickel, G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. (pp. 323–357). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/12069-012
Yi, R., Mitchell, S. H., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Delay discounting and substance abuse-dependence. In G. J. Madden, W. K. Bickel, G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting. (pp. 191–211). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/12069-007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weatherly, J.N., Wise, R.A. & Derenne, A. Probability Discounting of Legal and Non-Legal Outcomes. Behav. Soc. Iss. 21, 165–187 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v2110.4183
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v2110.4183