Journal List > J Korean Med Assoc > v.52(6) > 1042168

TOOLS
Kim and Yi: Issues of Disability Evaluation -Difficulties, Inappropriateness and Proposals-
Focused Issue of This Month
The Criterion of Impairment Evaluation
Journal of the Korean Medical Association

Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2009; 52(6): 558-566.

Published online: 30 June 2009

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2009.52.6.558

Issues of Disability Evaluation -Difficulties, Inappropriateness and Proposals-

Bu Hwan Kim, MD1, Seung Rim Yi, MD2

1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Daedong Hospital, Korea.

2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Police Hospital, Korea. ysr@nph.go.kr

Copyright © 2009 Korean Medical Association

Abstract

The issues concerning the disability evaluating system in Korea are controversial to say the least. Evaluating systems are so complicated that they continually cause confusion to medical examiners even though they must evaluate patient's medical status accurately, objectively and reasonably to provide adequate compensation for patients. However, controlling associations or educating curricula for disability evaluation are not in place. This study investigates the impending problems of disability evaluation in Korea and discussed what should be done to improve the situations. Social environments, evaluating standards, examiners' capability and education are reviewed in an effort to present an adequate proposals to Korean medical examiners.

Keywords: Disability evaluation, Issues, Proposals

References

1. Lee SD, Yi SR. Practical guidelines of physical impairment and disability evaluation. 2005. Seoul: Jungangmoonhwa;3–9.
2. Jung HY. The changing concept of impairment and disability. Independent Medical Examination. 2005. 2:5–11.
3. Lee SK. Problems of assessment of physical impairment and disability evaluation in central nervous system in korea. Independent Medical Examination. 2004. 1:20–25.
4. Ahn DH. Some issues in impairment and disability evaluation. Independent Medical Examination. 2004. 1:26–31.
5. Ro MT. Considerations to the evaluation of permanent impairment in orthopedics. Independent Medical Examination. 2004. 1:32–34.
6. Cho KH. The present condition and problems of the guideline for disability evaluation in korea. Independent Medical Examination. 2004. 1:35–37.
7. Yoo JH, Yi SR. The measurement of joint instability or laxity and its validity. Independent Medical Examination. 2005. 5:14–20.
8. Lee KS. Medical assessment of compensation & indemnity. 2002. 4th ed. Seoul: Jungangmoonhwa;17–32.
9. Lim KS. Guideline of compensation medicine. 2004. 5th ed. Seoul: Jungangmoonhwa;37–74.
10. McBride ED. Disability evaluation and principles of treatment of compensable injuries. 1963. 6th ed. Philadelphia: J.B.Lippincott;68–103.
11. Cocchiarella NB, Andersson G. Guidelines to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 2001. 5th ed. Chicago, IL: AMA press.
12. Won JU. Toward improvement of workers' compensation system in korea. Independent Medical Examination. 2006. 3:71–76.
13. Suh TW. Current status and direction of the expansion of statutory disabilities in the disability act. Independent Medical Examination. 2005. 2:12–16.
14. Lee KS. Independent medical examination, concepts and needs. Independent Medical Examination. 2005. 2:1–4.
15. Lee SD. How to write medical document. Independent Medical Examination. 2005. 2:17–21.
16. Korean orthopedic association. Disability evaluation. 2005. 1st ed. Seoul: Seoul Medical Co..
17. Kang SH, Li Z, Lee SD. Review of temporary disability. Independent Medical Examination. 2006. 3:90–93.
18. Lee SH. The disability evaluating system in USA. Independent Medical Examination. 2005. 2:22–26.
19. Yi SR. Problems of examiner's discretion in disability evaluation. Independent Medical Examination. 2006. 3:77–79.
TOOLS
Similar articles