KoreaMed Synapse

Journal List > J Korean Med Assoc > v.48(5) > 1080527

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Park: Is VBAC(Vaginal Birth After Cesarean) Really Safe?

Special Contribution

Journal of the Korean Medical Association

Journal of the Korean Medical Association 2005; 48(5): 489-500.

Published online: 31 May 2005

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2005.48.5.489

Is VBAC(Vaginal Birth After Cesarean) Really Safe?

Joong Shin Park

jsparkmd@snu.ac.kr

Copyright © 2005 Korean Medical Association

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

jkma-48-489-g001

Figure 2

jkma-48-489-g002

Table 1

jkma-48-489-i001

^*Relative precentage change when comparing 1996 with 2000

^†Confidence interval

^‡Payment source is state/local government program, Title V funds, or military

Table 2

jkma-48-489-i002

Table 3

jkma-48-489-i003

Table 4

jkma-48-489-i004

References

1. Cragin EB. Conservatism in obstetrics. NY Med J. 1916. 104:1–3.

2. ACOG committee opinion #17: Guidelines for vaginal delivery after cesarean birth. 1984. Washington DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

3. ACOG practice bulletin #1: Vaginal delivery after previous cesarean birth. 1995. Washington DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

4. Bernstein S. County C-section rule took heavy human toll. Los Angeles Times. 1998. 01. 25. A1. A26.

5. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Number 5, July 1999. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999. 66:197–204.

6. Task Force on Cesarean Delivery Rates: Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery. 2000. Washington DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

7. Menacker F, Curtin SC. Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-99. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2001. 49:1–16.

8. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Sutton PD. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Births: preliminary data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003. 51:1–20.

9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Number54, July 2004. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004. 104:203–212.

10. Deutchman M, Roberts RG. VBAC: protecting patients, defending doctors. Am Fam Physician. 2003. 67:931–932.

11. Vaginal birth after cesarean birth-California, 1996-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkl Rep. 2002. 51:996–998.

12. Mozurkewich EL, Hutton EK. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a meta-analysis of the literature from 1989 to 1999. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 183:1187–1197.

13. Smith GC, Pell JP, Cameron AD, Dobbie R. Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies. JAMA. 2002. 287:2684–2690.

14. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2001. 345:3–8.

15. Greene MF. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section: is the risk acceptable. N Engl J Med. 2001. 345:54–55.

16. Gyamfi C, Juhasz G, Gyamfi P, Stone JL. Increased success of trial of labor after previous vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2004. 104:715–719.

17. Hendler I, Bujold E. Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2004. 104:273–277.

18. Clark SL, Scott JR, Porter TF, Schlappy DA, McClellan V, Burton DA. Is vaginal birth after cesarean less expensive than repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000. 182:599–602.

19. Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Zelop CM, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Rate of uterine rupture in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999. 181:872–876.

20. Gregory KD, Korst LM, Cane P, Platt LD, Kahn K. Vaginal birth after cesarean and uterine rupture rates in California. Obstet Gynecol. 1999. 94:985–989.

21. Kieser KE, Baskett TF. A 10-year population-based study of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 100:749–753.

22. Chung A, Macario A, El-Sayed YY, Riley ET, Duncan B, Druzin ML. Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2001. 97:932–941.

23. DiMaio H, Edwards RK, Euliano TY, Treloar RW, Cruz AC. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an historic cohort cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 186:890–892.

24. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 1991. 77:465–470.

25. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB, Lieberman E. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999. 181:882. 886.

26. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Gabbe SG, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004. 351:2581–2589.

27. Phelan JP. VBAC: Time to reconsider. OBG Management. 1996. 11:62–68.

28. Harer WB Jr. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: current status. JAMA. 2002. 287:2627–2630.

TOOLS

Similar articles