Journal List > J Korean Med Assoc > v.46(5) > 1080245

Kim: Laparoscopic Surgery

Abstract

More than 17 years have elapsed since the introduction of the laparoscopy in the surgical field. The principal characteristics of the laparoscopic surgery that differ from the conventional open surgery are 1) pneumoperitoneum is achieved by the insufflation of CO2 into the abdominal cavity, 2) injury to the abdominal wall is minimized by the use of three to five 5~12 mm trocars, 3) intraabdominal organ and tissue manipulation is reduced and 4) the operative field becomes less dry as the abdominal cavity is not exposed to the room environment. These factors, especially the minimized wound and tissue manipulation, are responsible for the reduced postoperative neuroendocrine and cytokine reactions, decreased pulmonary complications, rapid return of bowel functions, reduced rate of wound complications and the lower incidence of postoperative adhesions. These differences are clinically reflected by a decreased postoperative pain, reduced hospital stay, diminished incidence of postoperative complications and a rapid return to work. To date, laparoscopic surgery is applied to almost all fields of surgery and its indication is expanding everyday. Currently performed laparoscopic procedures include laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy, diagnostic laparoscopy, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, laparoscopic fundoplication, laparoscopic Heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia, laparoscopic surgery for solid organs such as the laparoscopic splenectomy and laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Advancements in the laparoscopic instruments and technique have allowed the performance of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, laparoscopic colonic and gastric resections. Once considered a contraindication due to the risk of air embolism and massive bleeding, laparoscopic hepatic resection is being performed nowadays and reported in the literature. In conclusion, in the near future, with further technological improvement, laparoscopic surgery would almost completely replace the conventional open surgery.

References

1. Chekan EG, Pappas TN. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. Minimally invasive surgery. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 2001. 16th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;292–310.
2. Schauer Eubank S. Sabiston DC, Lyerly HK, editors. Laparoscopic surgery. Textbook of surgery. 1997. 15th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;791–807.
5. Schulze S, Krisitiansen VB, Fischer Hansen B, Rosenberg J. Sealing of cystic duct with bipolar electrocoagulation. Surg Endosc. 2002. 16:342–344.
crossref
6. Schauer PR, Sirinek KR. The laparoscopic approach reduces the endocrine response to elective cholecystectomy. Am Surg. 1995. 61:106–111.
7. Joris J, Cigarini I, Legrad M, Jacquet N, De Groote D, Lamy M, et al. Metabolic and respiratoy changes after cholecystectomy performed via laparotomy or laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 1992. 69:341–345.
crossref
8. Mealy K, Gallagher H, Barry M, Lennon F, Traynor O, Hyland J. Physiological and metabolic responses to open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1992. 79:1061–1064.
crossref
9. Cho JM, LaPorta AJ, Clark JR, Schofield MJ, Hammond SL, Mallory PL. Response of serum cytokines in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1994. 8:1380–1383.
crossref
10. Bessler M, Whelan RL, Halverson A, Treat MR, Nowygrod R. Is immune functiion better preserved after laparoscopic versus open colon resection? Surg Endosc. 1994. 8:881–883.
crossref
11. Kloosterman T, von Blomberg BME, Borgstein P, Cuesta MA, Scheper RJ, Meijer S. Unimpaired immune functions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1994. 115:424–428.
12. Redmond HP, Watson RWG, Houghton T, Condron C, Watson RGK, Bouchier-Hayes D. Immune function in patients undergoing open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1994. 129:1240–1246.
crossref
13. Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Okeson GC, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Smith RW, et al. Open vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy : A comparison of postoperative pulmonary function. Ann Surg. 1991. 213:651–654.
crossref
14. Schauer PR, Luna J, Ghiatas AA, Glen ME, Warren JM, Sirinek KR. Pulmonary function after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1993. 114:389–397.
crossref
15. Davis W, Tu Q, Kollmorgen C, Donohue J, Thompson G, Nelson H, et al. Duration of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic and open segmental colectomy. Gastroenterology. 1995. 108:Suppl. A1217.
crossref
16. Garcia-Caballero M, Vara-Thorbeck C. The evolution of postoperative ileus after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1993. 7:416–419.
crossref
17. Lundorff P, Hahlin M, Kallfelt B, Thorburn J, Lindblom B. Adhesion formation after laparoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy : a randomized trial versus laparotomy. Fertil Steril. 1991. 55:911–915.
crossref
18. Williams LF, Chapman WC, Bonau RA, McGee EC, Boyd RW, Jacobs JK. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg. 1993. 165:459–465.
crossref
19. Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg. 1993. 165:9–14.
crossref
20. Attwood SEA, Hill ADK, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB. A prospective randomized trial of laparaoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery. 1992. 112:497–501.
21. Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1999. 177:250–256.
crossref
23. Romano F, Caprotti C, Franciosi C, De Fina S, Colombo G, Uggeri F. Laparoscopic splenectomy using ligasure. Preliminary experience. Surg Endosc. 2002. 16:1608–1611.
24. Brooks DC. A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and tension-free open herniorrhaphy. Arch Surg. 1994. 129:361–366.
crossref
25. Hernias Eubanks WS. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 2001. 16th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;783–801.
28. Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P. A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery : a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg. 1998. 187:46–57.
29. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Pique JM, Delgado S, Campo E, Visa J, et al. Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc. 1995. 9:1101–1105.
crossref
30. Fusco MA, Paluzzi MW. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993. 36:858–861.
crossref
31. Cirocco WC, Schwartzman A, Golub RW. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer. Surgery. 1994. 116:842–846.
32. Franklin ME Jr, Rosenthal D, Abrego-Medina D, Dodrman JP, Glass JL, Diaz A, et al. Prospective comparison of open vs. laparoscopic colon surgery for carcinoma. five-year results. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996. 39:10 Suppl. S35–S46.
33. Khalili TM, Fleshner PR, Hiatt JR, Sokol TP, Manookian C, Phillips EH, et al. Colorectal cancer:comparison of laparoscopic with open approaches. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998. 41:832–838.
34. Santoro E, Carlini M, Carboni F, Feroce A. Colorectal carcinoma : laparoscopic versus traditional open surgery. A clinical trial. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999. 46:900–904.
38. Ohgami M, Otani Y, Kumai K, Kubota T, Kim YI, Kitajima M. Curative laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer : five years experience. World J Surg. 1999. 23:187–193.
crossref
40. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Shiromizu A, Bandoh T, Aramaki M, Kitano S. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy compared with conventional open gastrectomy. Arch Surg. 2000. 135:806–810.
crossref
41. Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Kitano S. Modern treatment of early gastric cancer:review of the Japanese experience. Dig Surg. 2002. 19:333–339.
crossref
42. Morino M, Toppino M, Bonnet G, Rosa R, Garrone C. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty for morbid obesity. Surg Endosc. 2002. 16:1566–1572.
crossref
43. Brunicardi FC, Reardon PR, Matthews BD. Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL, editors. The surgical treatment of Morbid obesity. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 2001. 16th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;247–256.
44. Takagi S, Kaneko H, Ishii T, Tamura A, Yamazaki K, Shiba T, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for extrahepatic growing tumor-surgical strategy based on extrahepatic growing index. Surg Endosc. 2002. 16:1573–1578.
crossref
45. Itamoto T, Katayama K, Miura Y, Hino H, Ohdan H, Asahara T, et al. Gasless laparoscopic hepatic resection for cirrhotic patients with solid liver tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002. 12:325–330.
crossref
46. Fong Y, Jarnagin W, Conlon KC, DeMatteo R, Dougherty E, Blumgart LH. Hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection : lessons from an initial experience. Arch Surg. 2000. 135:854–859.
47. Lesurtel M, Cherqui D, Laurent A, Tayar C, Fagniez PL. Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy : a casecontrol study. J Am Coll Surg. 2003. 196:236–242.
crossref
48. Descottes B, Glineur D, Lachachi F, Valleix D, Paineau J, Gigot JF, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection of benign liver tumors. Surg Endosc. 2003. 17:23–30.
crossref
49. Costi R, Capelluto E, Sperduto N, Bruyns J, Himpens J, Cadiere GB. Laparoscopic right posterior hepatic bisegmentectomy (Segments VII-VIII). Surg Endosc. 2003. 17:162.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles