J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jan;30(1):47-49. English.
Published online Jul 19, 2021.
Copyright © 2022 Korean Society of Echocardiography
Editorial

Evaluation of LA Dynamics: a Classical Yet Still Challenging Topic until Now

Se-Jung Yoon, MD, PhD
    • Division of Cardiology, NHIS Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Received June 23, 2021; Accepted July 08, 2021.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

As is well known, the left atrium (LA) is usually thought of as a way to supply blood flow to the left ventricle (LV) (the conduit function) as well as a place to store blood (the reservoir function); however, the LA also satisfies an important active pumping role in filling the ventricles with blood (the booster pump function). The principal function of the LA is to modulate LV filling and cardiovascular performance. The atrial booster pump function reflects the magnitude and timing of atrial contractility, but is dependent on the degree of venous return (atrial pre-load), LV end-diastolic pressures (atrial afterload), and LV systolic reserve.1)

Many studies have analyzed the precise functions of LA with regard to numerous diseases, and there are several studies in the field of LA contractions.2), 3), 4), 5) LA size and function can be assessed by echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. In clinical practice, echocardiography is the most common assessment tool because of its simplicity, safety, and ability to image in real time with high temporal resolution.6) Normally, LA function is assessed using 2-dimensional echocardiography through volumetric analysis, spectral Doppler, tissue Doppler, strain, and strain rate imaging.7), 8), 9), 10), 11) However, not all methods produce perfect numerical representations of LA functions.

In this paper, the authors focused on the LA active pumping function to find a simpler method of assessment compared to current vendor-dependent tools in serious ischemic patients.12) The attempts to find simpler and more convenient indexes that do not rely on vendors to evaluate complex, ever-changing LA function are significant. In particular, LA active emptying fractions have significant associations with many indexes, including classical indicators of LA functions such as the E/e′ ratio and LA volume index in multivariable regression analysis.

The spectrum of diastolic dysfunction varies widely, depending on the type of disease and its severity. From mild early cases to more severe forms, diastolic dysfunction has various presentations such as low ejection fraction, valvular dysfunction, or cardiomyopathy. According to these conditions, the size and ratio of the E and A waves in the transmitral flow vary, representing the conduit and booster pump function each. Therefore, to analyze LA function, it is necessary to determine the characteristics of the target group as the first step.

This study included patients with serious coronary disease, however we can see the diastolic function of this group is not so impaired from relatively preserved average ejection fraction (48%), younger age group (62 years old), small amount of LA enlargement patients (16%), low E/e′ ratio (mean value of 9), and pattern of E/A ratio (0.8). In particular, we found that LA active emptying fractions have a significant inverse correlation with the usual indexes of LA dysfunction in this group.

On the contrary, an MRI study in a normal group showed that as age increases, volumetric atrial contraction contribution also increases. In this study with 120 normal subjects, we found a significant linear correlation between atrial contraction contribution and age. This is most likely due to abnormal left ventricular relaxation.13)

Important considerations for such detailed volumetric LA analysis should include valvular problems, atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, or cardiomyopathy. Similarly, later analysis of active contraction in the extended population can be also helpful. Finally, there are expected clinical benefits to analyzing the relationship between pre-operative LA contraction function and post-coronary artery bypass graft prognosis.

Notes

Conflict of Interest:The author has no financial conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Hoit BD. Left atrial size and function: role in prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:493–505.
    1. Thomas L, Marwick TH, Popescu BA, Donal E, Badano LP. Left atrial structure and function, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:1961–1977.
    1. Liu YY, Xie MX, Xu JF, et al. Evaluation of left atrial function in patients with coronary artery disease by two-dimensional strain and strain rate imaging. Echocardiography 2011;28:1095–1103.
    1. Abdelghani Abdelzaher M, Atteia WM. Left atrial geometry and pump function in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2014;5:45–50.
    1. Cao S, Zhou Q, Chen JL, Hu B, Guo RQ. The differences in left atrial function between ischemic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy patients: a two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging study. J Clin Ultrasound 2016;44:437–445.
    1. Yu S, Zhang Y. Assessment of left atrial function: another window to detect early cardiac impairment? J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2017;19:1105–1107.
    1. Kühl JT, Møller JE, Kristensen TS, Kelbæk H, Kofoed KF. Left atrial function and mortality in patients with NSTEMI an MDCT study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:1080–1087.
    1. Bernhardt P, Schmidt H, Hammerstingl C, Lüderitz B, Omran H. Patients with atrial fibrillation and dense spontaneous echo contrast at high risk a prospective and serial follow-up over 12 months with transesophageal echocardiography and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:1807–1812.
    1. Thomas L, Levett K, Boyd A, Leung DY, Schiller NB, Ross DL. Changes in regional left atrial function with aging: evaluation by Doppler tissue imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr 2003;4:92–100.
    1. Mochizuki A, Yuda S, Oi Y, et al. Assessment of left atrial deformation and synchrony by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: comparative studies in healthy subjects and patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:165–174.
    1. Lindqvist P, Henein M. Left atrial strain rate during atrial contraction predicts raised pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: evidence for left atrio-ventricular interaction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;37:1529–1538.
    1. Etemad T, Hosseinsabet A, Omidi N, Mohseni-Badalabadi R. Determinants of the volumetric markers of left atrial contraction function in coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study. J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022;30:37–46.
    1. Alhogbani T, Strohm O, Friedrich MG. Evaluation of left atrial contraction contribution to left ventricular filling using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;37:860–864.

Metrics
Share
ORCID IDs
PERMALINK