Published online Sep 30, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2018.25.3.115
Risk Factors for Wound Infection in Spinal Surgery: A Focus on Diabetes Mellitus
Abstract
Study Design
Retrospective study.
Objectives
To identify risk factors for infection after spinal surgery.
Summary of Literature Review
Infection after spinal surgery is relatively uncommon. However, such infections cause serious consequences and increased costs and sequelae. Risk factors for infection after spinal surgery include a posterior approach, instrumentation, the use of an allogenic bone graft, transfusion, and a long operating time. Patient-related factors include diabetes and obesity.
Materials and Methods
From January 2009 to December 2013, 350 patients who underwent surgery at our hospital due to spinal disease, including 10 patients with a postoperative spinal infection, were evaluated. We investigated patients' age, gender, morbidity due to diabetes mellitus, body mass index, level of surgery, approach, location, instrumentation, and operation type.
Results
Ten of the 350 patients developed a spinal infection after surgery. The proportion of diabetic patients among the infected patients was higher than among the non-infected patients, although the difference was not statistically significant. Additionally, the proportion of diabetic patients with hemoglobin A1c levels greater than 7.0% was higher among the infected patients. Operating time, the surgical approach, drain tube insertion, transfusion, and the use of an allogenic bone graft were not significantly different between the infected and non-infected patient groups.
Conclusions
Uncontrolled diabetes is the most important risk factor for the development of spinal infection after surgery. Therefore, in order to prevent infection after surgery, blood glucose should be controlled before surgery.
Fig. 1
A diagram of patient enrollment.
Fig. 2
Magnetic resonance imaging (sagittal view, axial view) shows osteomyelitis of the L3 vertebra body (A) and large fluid collection on both psoas muscles (B) in an 86-year-old patient who had posterior fusion from T12 to L3.
Table 1
Demographics in the two groups; surgical site infection group, non-surgical site infection group
Table 2
Demographics in the two groups; uncontrolled DM group, controlled DM group
References
-
Kasliwal MK, Tan LA, Traynelis VC. Infection with spinal instrumentation: Review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. Surg Neurol Int 2013;4 Suppl 5:S392–S403. [doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.120783]
-
-
Ahn DK, Choi DJ, Park HS, et al. Precautions against infection following posterior spinal fusion based on types of infection and risk factors. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 2009;16(4):274–284.
-
-
Klekamp J, Spengler DM, McNamara MJ, et al. Risk factors associated with methicillin-resistant staphylococcal wound infection after spinal surgery. J Spinal Disord 1999 Jun;12(3):187–191. [doi: 10.1097/00002517-199906000-00002]
-
-
Liao JC, Chen WJ, Chen LH, et al. Postoperative wound infection rates after posterior instrumented spinal surgery in diabetic patients. Chang Gung Med J 2006 Sep-Oct;29(5):480–485.
-
-
Olsen MA, Mayfield J, Lauryssen C, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery. J Neurosurg 2003 Mar;98 2 Suppl:149–155.
-
-
Twigg SM, Chen MM, Joly AH, et al. Advanced glycosylation end products up-regulate connective tissue growth factor (insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-related protein 2) in human fibroblasts: a potential mechanism for expansion of extracellular matrix in diabetes mellitus. Endocrinology 2001 May;142(5):1760–1769. [doi: 10.1210/endo.142.5.8141]
-
-
Keller RB, Pappas AM. Infection after spinal fusion using internal fixation instrumentation. Orthop Clin North Am 1972 Mar;3(1):99–111.
-
-
Lonstein J, Winter R, Moe J, et al. Wound infection with Harrington instrumentation and spine fusion for scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1973 Oct;(96):222–233. [doi: 10.1097/00003086-197310000-00032]
-
-
Prothero SR, Parkes JC, Stinchfield FE. Complications after low-back fusion in 1000 patients: A comparison of two series one decade apart. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1966;48:57–65. [doi: 10.2106/00004623-196648010-00004]
-
-
Chang HJ, Nam JH, Kim DY, et al. The effect of surgical scrub in orthopaedic surgery. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2014 Feb;49(1):36–42. [doi: 10.4055/jkoa.2014.49.1.36]
-