Published online Sep 30, 2002.
https://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2002.9.3.204
Treatment of Posterior Facet Fracture-Dislocation in Lumbar Spine
Abstract
Study Design
Retrospective study.
Objectives
The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of short segment fusion and long segment fusion in posterior facet fracture-dislocation in the lumbar spine.
Summary of Literature Review
There are many controversies exist about the treatment of fracture-dislocation in lumbar spine.
Material and Methods
Sixteen patients with lumbar fracture-dislocation were studied retrospectively. The patients divided two groups; group one treated with one level above and below the fracture segment fixation, group two treated with two level above and below the fracture segment fixation. Two groups were compared with neurologic recovery, bladder function recovery and radiologic changes of deformities.
Results
The neurologic deficit in two groups was improved more than one Frankel grade at last follow up. Patients who showed intact dura were neurologically improved significantly than the patients whose dura was ruptured. Radiologic changes were not a sinificant difference in two groups.
Conclusion
In lumbar fracture-dislocation treatment, one level above and below the fracture segment fixed with pedicle screw fixation system was an effective treatment method which preserved the mobile segment lumbar spine.
Fig. 1
B : Immediate postoperative radiograph, treated posterolateral fusion with above and below 1 level fixation, shows satisfactory reduction. C : Twelve months after operation, lateral radiograph shows 3° loss of sagittal angle
A : Initial lateral radiograph shows L4-5 fracture dislocation.
Fig. 2
C. Immediate postoperative radiograph, treated posterolateral fusion with above and below 2 level fixation, shows satisfactory reduction. D. 5 years after operation , lateral radiograph shows 5° loss of sagittal angle.
A, B. Initial anteroposterior(A) and lateral(B) radiographs show L5-S1 fracture dislocation.
Table 1
Level of Fracture-Dislocation
Table 2
Neurologic deficit (Frankel grade system)
Table 3
Neurologic recovery compared dura tear and non-dura tear
References
-
Bohlman HH. Treatment of fracture and dislocations of the thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 1985;67-A:165–169.
-
-
Chapman JR, Anderson PA. Thoracolunbar spine fractures with neurologic deficit. Orthop Clin North Am 1994;25:595–597.
-
-
Choi WS, Baik CH, Cho SS, Park HJ, Koh DH. Clinical analysis of unstable thoracolumbar fractures and fracture-dislocation using transpedicular screws. J Korean Orthop Assoc 1991;26:719–727.
-
-
Denis F, Ruiz H, Searls K. Comparison between square-ended distraction rods and standard round-ended distraction rods in the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Clin Orthop 1984;189:162–167.
-
-
Dick W. In: Internal fixation of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. 1st ed. Toronto: Hans Huber Co; 1989. pp. 75-86.
-
-
Dickson JH, Harrington RP, Erwin WD. Harrington instrumentation in the fractured unstable thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 1973;55-A:422–426.
-
-
Edward CC, Levine AM. Early rod sleeve stabilization of the injured thoracic and lumbar spine. Orthop Clin North Am 1986;17:121–145.
-
-
McLain RF, Sparling E, Benson DR. Early failure of short-segment pedicle instrumentation for thoracolumbar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 1993;75-A:162–167.
-
-
Shaffrey CJ, Saffrey ME, Whitehill R, Nockels RP. Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Neurosurgery Clin North Am 1997;8:519–540.
-
-
Stauffer ES. Internal fixation of fracture of the thoracolumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 1984;66-A:1136–1138.
-
-
Stauffer ES. In: Thoracolumbar spine fractures without neurologic deficit. 1993. pp. 49-80.AAOS monography series
-
-
Tasdemirogle E, Tibbs PA. Long-term follow-up results of thoracolumbar fractures after posterior instrumentation. Spine 1995;20:1704–1708.
-