J Korean Surg Soc. 2010 Aug;79(2):137-142. Korean.
Published online Aug 02, 2010.
Copyright © 2010 The Korean Surgical Society
Original Article

Clinical Analysis of Inguinal Hernia in Adult Using Prolene Hernia System

Won Il Lee, M.D., Hae Sung Kim, M.D., Byoung Yoon Ryu, M.D., Hong Ki Kim, M.D., Jin Won Lee, M.D., Young Hee Choi, M.D.,1 Jin Bong Kim, M.D.,2 and Jae Sung Lee, M.D.3
    • Department of Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
    • 1Department of Pathology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
    • 2Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
    • 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Received January 05, 2010; Accepted April 19, 2010.

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to detail clinical experiences with a type of tension-free herniorrhaphy using the prolene hernia system (PHS) and analyze the system's usefulness.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 122 patients who underwent an inguinal hernia repair using PHS between March 2004 and August 2008.

Results

There were 116 male and 6 female patients ages 14 to 99; 79 indirect, 33 direct, 10 pantaloon hernias. The right inguinal hernias were more frequent (64.7%). The mean operative time for inguinal hernia repair using PHS was 45.2±1.5 minutes and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.5±1.5 days (101±82.9 hours). The most frequent combined disease was hypertension. The most frequent complication of PHS repair was hematoma. The mean number of used analgesics was 3.1±3.3. There were no postoperative recurrences.

Conclusion

Tension-free herniorrhaphy using PHS is thought to be a useful method of inguinal hernia repair in adults because it offers lower postoperative pain, shorter operation time and shorter postoperative hospital stay.

Keywords
Inguinal hernia; Tension-free; Prolene hernia system

Figures

Fig. 1
Hernia types and age distribution.

Tables

Table 1
Clinical characteristics of patients who received an inguinal hernia repair using prolene hernia system

Table 2
Location and type of hernias

Table 3
Combined disease

Table 4
Postoperative complications

References

    1. Bassini E. Nuovo metodo per la cura radicale hernia inguinale. Atti Conger Assoc Med 1887;2:179.
    1. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG. Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery. Including a new concept, introducing tension-free repair. Int Surg 1986;71:1–4.
    1. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. "Tension-free" inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the "mesh plug" technique. Surgery 1993;114:3–8.
    1. Gilbert AI, Graham MF, Voigt WJ. A bilayer patch device for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 1999;3:161–166.
    1. Awad SS, Fagan SP. Current approaches to inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 2004;188:9S–16S.
    1. Nyhus LM, Condon RE. In: Hernia. 4th ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott; 1995. pp. 3-199.
    1. Abrahamson J. Hernias. In: Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, Ellis H, editors. Maingot's Abdominal Operations. 10th ed. London: Prentice Hall International; 1989. pp. 506.
    1. Sanjay P, Woodward A. Local versus general anaesthesia with Prolene Hernia System mesh for inguinal hernia repair: early and long-term outcomes. Dig Surg 2008;25:347–350.
    1. Choi CJ, Park KJ, Kim SH. Comparison of three types of hernioplasty using meshes for adult inguinal hernia: lichtenstein, mesh-plug, prolene hernia system. J Korean Surg Soc 2009;76:109–114.
    1. You JM, Lee KM, Choi UJ. Direct comparison of PHS(R) and Perfix(R) herniorrhaphy under local anesthesia. J Korean Surg Soc 2007;72:57–62.
    1. Lee YT, Yang YS, Lee YJ, Ko SJ. A tension-free herniorrhaphy using the prolene hernia system: clinical experiences. J Korean Surg Soc 2008;74:361–365.
    1. Murphy JW. Use of the prolene hernia system for inguinal hernia repair: retrospective, comparative time analysis versus other inguinal hernia repair systems. Am Surg 2001;67:919–923.
    1. Jung SW, Heo TG, Lee JM, Choi PW, Park JH, Lee MS, et al. Clinical analysis of 473 cases of inguinal hernia in adult patients. J Korean Surg Soc 2008;75:109–115.
    1. Kim HC, Chung M. 120 cases of hernia repair with bilayer patch (prolene hernia system). J Korean Surg Soc 2006;70:204–208.
    1. Millikan KW, Kosik ML, Doolas A. A prospective comparison of transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair versus traditional open hernia repair in a university setting. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:247–253.
    1. McGillicuddy JE. Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures. Arch Surg 1998;133:974–978.
    1. Ferzli GS, Edwards ED, Khoury GE. Chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205:333–341.
    1. Callesen T, Bech K, Kehlet H. Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg 1999;86:1528–1531.
    1. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Krukowski ZH, Smith WC. Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2001;88:1122–1126.
    1. Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Mitchell P, Nixon JA, Preshaw RM, Hagen NA. Cooperative hernia study. Pain in the postrepair patient. Ann Surg 1996;224:598–602.
    1. Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T, Yamamoto Y, Ishiwa N, Morinaga S, Noguchi Y, et al. Long-term outcome after hernia repair with the prolene hernia system. Surg Today 2006;36:1058–1062.
    1. Awad SS, Yallampalli S, Srour AM, Bellows CF, Albo D, Berger DH. Improved outcomes with the Prolene Hernia System mesh compared with the time-honored Lichtenstein onlay mesh repair for inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 2007;193:697–701.
    1. EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 2000;87:854–859.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 1

Tables

1 / 4

PERMALINK