Published online Aug 02, 2010.
https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2010.79.2.137
Clinical Analysis of Inguinal Hernia in Adult Using Prolene Hernia System
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to detail clinical experiences with a type of tension-free herniorrhaphy using the prolene hernia system (PHS) and analyze the system's usefulness.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 122 patients who underwent an inguinal hernia repair using PHS between March 2004 and August 2008.
Results
There were 116 male and 6 female patients ages 14 to 99; 79 indirect, 33 direct, 10 pantaloon hernias. The right inguinal hernias were more frequent (64.7%). The mean operative time for inguinal hernia repair using PHS was 45.2±1.5 minutes and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.5±1.5 days (101±82.9 hours). The most frequent combined disease was hypertension. The most frequent complication of PHS repair was hematoma. The mean number of used analgesics was 3.1±3.3. There were no postoperative recurrences.
Conclusion
Tension-free herniorrhaphy using PHS is thought to be a useful method of inguinal hernia repair in adults because it offers lower postoperative pain, shorter operation time and shorter postoperative hospital stay.
Fig. 1
Hernia types and age distribution.
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of patients who received an inguinal hernia repair using prolene hernia system
Table 2
Location and type of hernias
Table 3
Combined disease
Table 4
Postoperative complications
References
-
Bassini E. Nuovo metodo per la cura radicale hernia inguinale. Atti Conger Assoc Med 1887;2:179.
-
-
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG. Ambulatory outpatient hernia surgery. Including a new concept, introducing tension-free repair. Int Surg 1986;71:1–4.
-
-
Rutkow IM, Robbins AW. "Tension-free" inguinal herniorrhaphy: a preliminary report on the "mesh plug" technique. Surgery 1993;114:3–8.
-
-
Gilbert AI, Graham MF, Voigt WJ. A bilayer patch device for inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 1999;3:161–166.
-
-
Nyhus LM, Condon RE. In: Hernia. 4th ed. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott; 1995. pp. 3-199.
-
-
Abrahamson J. Hernias. In: Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, Ellis H, editors. Maingot's Abdominal Operations. 10th ed. London: Prentice Hall International; 1989. pp. 506.
-
-
Choi CJ, Park KJ, Kim SH. Comparison of three types of hernioplasty using meshes for adult inguinal hernia: lichtenstein, mesh-plug, prolene hernia system. J Korean Surg Soc 2009;76:109–114.
-
-
You JM, Lee KM, Choi UJ. Direct comparison of PHS(R) and Perfix(R) herniorrhaphy under local anesthesia. J Korean Surg Soc 2007;72:57–62.
-
-
Lee YT, Yang YS, Lee YJ, Ko SJ. A tension-free herniorrhaphy using the prolene hernia system: clinical experiences. J Korean Surg Soc 2008;74:361–365.
-
-
Jung SW, Heo TG, Lee JM, Choi PW, Park JH, Lee MS, et al. Clinical analysis of 473 cases of inguinal hernia in adult patients. J Korean Surg Soc 2008;75:109–115.
-
-
Kim HC, Chung M. 120 cases of hernia repair with bilayer patch (prolene hernia system). J Korean Surg Soc 2006;70:204–208.
-
-
Millikan KW, Kosik ML, Doolas A. A prospective comparison of transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair versus traditional open hernia repair in a university setting. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:247–253.
-
-
EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 2000;87:854–859.
-