Published online May 31, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2008.49.5.418
Initial Experience of Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy in Patients with Large Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Abstract
Purpose
Simple prostatectomy has been a mainstay of therapy for patients with large prostatic adenoma. We describe laparoscopic approach for resection of large prostatic adenoma as an alternative to open simple prostatectomy.
Materials and Methods
From July 2006 to May 2007 we performed Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy on 10 patients who were diagnosed with clinically benign prostate hyperplasia (maximal urine flow rate (MFR) ≤10ml/sec, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥12 scores, and prostate weight ≥75g). The steps of our extraperitoneal 5 port technique were longitudinal cystotomy, subcapsular plane development, enucleation of the obstructing prostatic adenoma, insertion of Spongospan into the prostatic fossa, traction of 22Fr balloon catheter and suture repair of cystotomy.
Results
We successfully performed the operation in all cases without conversion. The mean patient age is 68.1 years old (60-73). The mean preoperative PSA, prostate volume were 8.8ng/ml (1.8-16.9), 97g (74.1-120.6). The mean operating time and estimated blood loss were 204min (160-275) and 720ml (300-1,200). The resected mass weight was 45.5g (23-70). There were no major complications. The mean hospitalization stay and drain remove days were 11.3 days (9-14) and 5.6 days (4-8). The mean preoperative MFR, IPSS/quality of life (QoL) and were 2.8ml/sec (0-9.6), 25/5 (14-35/4-6) and 270ml (250-310). At 3 months postoperatively, the mean MFR, IPSS/QoL and residual urine volume were 15.6ml/sec (12-23), 10/2.6 (5-12/2-4) and 16.75 (10-40).
Conclusions
Laparoscopic simple prostatectomy could be a useful method for the treatment of large benign prostate hyperplasia. However, more experiences and comparative studies are needed to document the safe and effect compared to open prostatectomy and transurethral resection of prostate.
Fig. 1
Circumferential mucosal incision of bladder neck.
Fig. 2
Enucleation of adenoma by laparoscopic dissection.
Fig. 3
Prostatic fossa after removal of the adenoma.
Table 1
Patient characteristics and operative results
Table 2
Comparison of preoperative and postoperative Qmax, IPSS/QoL and PVR
References
-
Blute ML, Tomera KM, Hellerstein DK, McKiel CF Jr, Lynch JH, Regan JB, et al. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia results of the United States Prostatron Cooperative Study. J Urol 1993;150:1591–1596.
-
-
Byun CY, Cho SR. Comparison between the early and late results of operative therapy and thermotherapy for the benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 1995;36:715–721.
-
-
Yi JW, Kim JI, Jeon SH. Effectiveness and predictive value of responsiveness of the transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol 2005;46:246–251.
-
-
AUA Practice Guideline Committee. AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2003;170:530–547.
-
-
Han M, Partin AW. Retropubic and suprapubic open prostatectomy. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007. pp. 2845-2853.
-