Published online Oct 31, 2008.
https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2008.49.10.912
The Influences of Bladder Outlet Obstruction on Improvement of Storage Symptoms in Patients Who Underwent Transurethral Resection of Prostate
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the influences of preoperative bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) to be adjusted by age and prostate volume on improvement of storage symptoms in patients who underwent transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) in a long term follow up.
Materials and Methods
We performed retrospective study of 75 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) who had undergone TURP and preoperative urodynamics from July 2004 to December 2006. 18 patients of them were lost follow up in this period, so we analyzed 57 patients in this study. The degrees of BOO were measured by the Abrams-Griffiths (AG) number calculated according to the preoperative urodynamic data. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire were used to evaluate improvement of symptoms. Especially IPSS questions number 2, 4 and 7 were used to evaluate storage symptoms. Partial correlation analysis was done between the AG numbers and the degree of storage symptoms improvement, adjusted by the age and the prostate volume.
Results
There were significant decreases of the IPSS (p=0.029), storage symptom score (p=0.024) and frequency score (p=0.017) in BOO group compared to the non-BOO group. The changes of IPSS (γ=-0.338, p=0.012), storage symptoms score (γ=-0.292, p=0.031) and frequency symptom score (γ=-0.305, p=0.023) were significantly correlated with AG number.
Conclusions
These results suggested that the preoperative AG number derived from urodynamics was an important factor in predicting the postoperative results. It would be expected that the patients with high AG numbers might be more improved storage symptom after TURP.
Fig. 1
Comparison of the changes of symptom scores before and after TURP between the patients with and without bladder outlet obstruction. The patients with bladder outlet obstruction showed significant decrease of IPSS, storge symptom score and frequency score after TURP comparing with the patients without bladder outlet obstruction (p<0.05). Each bar is mean±SE. AG number: Abrams-Griffith number, TURP: transurethral resection of the prostate, BOO: bladder outlet obstruction.
Table 1
Comparison of the preoperative clinical findings
Table 2
Comparison of the changes of the symptom scores before and after TURP between the patients with and without bladder outlet obstruction
Table 3
Partial correlation between AG numbers and changes of symptom scores before and after TURP adjusted by age & prostate volume
References
-
Roehrborn CG. Current medical therapies for men with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia: achievements and limitations. Rev Urol 2008;10:14–25.
-
-
AUA Practice Guidelines Committee. AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2003;170:530–547.
-
-
Abrams P. Objective evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction. Br J Urol 1995;76 Suppl 1:11–15.
-
-
Choi HJ, Lee KS. Detrusor overactivity in patients with benign prostatic obstruction: the clinical and urodynamic characteristic. Korean J Urol 2005;46:805–809.
-
-
Lee KS, Hong SJ, Lee MS. The correlation between ultrasonic parameters of the prostate and the bladder outlet obstruction in BPH patients. Korean J Urol 2000;41:65–70.
-
-
Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Lieber M, Kaplan S, Geller J, Malek GH, et al. The PLESS Study Group. Serum prostate-specific antigen concentration is a powerful predictor of acute urinary retention and need for surgery in men with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1999;53:473–480.
-
-
Jung YS, Hwang TK, Kim JC. The outcome and satisfaction of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia following transurethral resection of the prostate according to urodynamic obstruction and the bladder function. Korean J Urol 2007;48:965–970.
-