Published online Jul 31, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2007.48.7.684
Estramustine Phosphate Based Chemotherapy for Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer
Abstract
Purpose
We wanted to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of estramustine monotherapy and estramustine plus etoposide or dexamethasone combined therapies for patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC).
Materials and Methods
Between 2000 and 2004, 33 patients who were diagnosed with HRPC and treated with estramustine-based chemotherapy were evaluated. Eleven patients had oral estramustine monotherapy (group 1), 12 patients had oral estramustine plus oral etoposide (group 2), and finally 10 patients had oral estramustine plus oral dexamethasone (group 3). The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, progression-free survival and disease-specific survival were evaluated.
Results
The median patient age was 71 years and the median PSA was 97.3ng/ml. The median follow-up period was 17 months (range: 5-47). The overall response rate was 45.5%, and the response rate for each group was 36.4% for group 1, 41.7% for group 2 and 70.0% for group 3, respectively. The median time to progression (TTP) was 5 months (range: 1-16) overall and it was 5 months, 5.5 months and 5 months in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Regarding the response rate, progression-free survival and disease specific survival, there were no statistically significant differences between the three groups (p>0.05). The most common hematologic complication was anemia that occurred in 28 patients and deep vein thrombosis occurred in 2. Severe toxicities (≥grade 3) occurred in only 2 patients.
Conclusions
Estramustine phosphate showed over a 45% response rates with less morbidities. Estramustine-based chemotherapy can be considered as an option for the treatment of HRPC. However, larger randomized controlled trials for regimens combined with other efficacious agents are necessary to elucidate the efficacy of chemotherapy for HRPC.
Fig. 1
Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival analyses according to the treatment groups. (A) Progression-free survival curves were not statistically different by the log rank test (p=0.734). (B) The disease-specific survival curves were not statistically different by the log rank test (p=0.686).
Table 1
Patients' characteristics
Table 2
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response
Table 3
Overall toxicity of estramustine based chemotherapy
Table 4
Toxicity of estramustine based chemotherapy among the groups
References
-
Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2004 Annual Report of the Central Cancer Registry in Korea. 2005.
-
-
Shin JS, Choi HJ, Choi YS, Chai SE, Choi HY. Predictive factor for the early progression of androgen independent prostate cancer in intermittent androgen deprivation therapy. Korean J Urol 2004;45:858–864.
-
-
Hudes G, Greenberg R, Krigel RL, Fox S, Scher R, Litwin S, et al. Phase-II study of estramustine and vinblastine, two microtubule inhibitors, in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1992;10:1754–1761.
-
-
Yagoda A, Smith JA Jr, Soloway MS. Phase II study of estramustine phosphate in advenced hormone refractory prostate cancer with increasing prostate specific antigen levels. J Urol 1991;145 Suppl:384.
-
-
Iversen P, Rasmussen F, Asmussen C, Christensen IJ, Eickhoff J, Klarskov P, et al. Danish Prostatic Cancer Group. Estramustine phosphate versus placebo as second line treatment after orchiectomy in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: DAPROCA study 9002. J Urol 1997;157:929–934.
-
-
Winquist E, Waldron T, Berry S, Ernst DS, Hotte S, Lukka H. Non-hormonal systemic therapy in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and metastases: a systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based Care's Genitourinary Cancer Disease Site Group. BMC Cancer 2006;6:112.
-
-
Pienta K, Redman B, Hussain M, Cummings G, Esper PS, Appel C, et al. Phase-II study of estramustine and oral etoposide in hormone-refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:2005–2012.
-
-
Hudes G, Einhorn L, Ross E, Balsham A, Loehrer P, Ramsey H, et al. Vinblastine versus vinblastine plus oral estramustine phosphate for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: A Hoosier Oncology Group and Fox Chase Network phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:3160–3166.
-
-
Hudes G, Ross E, Roth B. Improved survival for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer receiving estramustine-based antimicrotubule therapy: final report of a Hoosier oncology group and Fox Chase network phase III trial comparing vinblastine and vinblastine plus estramustine phosphate. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002;21 Suppl:177.abstract 704.
-
-
Armstrong AJ, Carducci MA. Chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer. In: Kirby RS, Partin AW, Feneley M, Parsons JK, editors. Prostate cancer. Principles and practice. 1st ed. London: Taylor&Francis; 2006. pp. 989-1003.
-
-
Tay MH, Nakabayashi M, Oh WK. Management of hormone refractory prostate cancer. In: Vogelzang NJ, Scardino PT, Shipley WU, Debruyne FM, Linehan WM, editors. Comprehensive textbook of genitourinary oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Williams&Wilkins; 2006. pp. 341-352.
-
-
Oh WK, Halabi S, Kelly WK, Werner C, Godley PA, Vogelzang NJ, et al. A phase II study of estramustine, docetaxel, and carboplatin with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma: Cancer and Leukemia Group B 99813. Cancer 2003;98:2592–2598.
-