Published online Nov 30, 2007.
https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2007.48.11.1165
5 Year Follow-up Results of Endoscopic Primary Realignment in Urethral Injury
Abstract
Purpose
The standard management of posterior urethral injury is controversial with regard to immediate primary realignment versus delayed urethroplasty. We analyzed the long-term results of treatment for urethral injury with performing immediate primary realignment.
Materials and Methods
19 patients with urethral injury were treated by endoscopic primary realignment from March 2000 to March 2002. Anterior and posterior urethral injuries were classified into the A and P groups, respectively, and the A and P groups had 11 and 8 patients, respectively. We investigated 5-years of follow-up complications, which were composed of urethral stricture, incontinence and impotence. The mean follow-up period was 69.8 months after injury, and the follow-up status was obtained from a patient questionnaire or a telephone interview.
Results
6 (75%) of the P group had post-realignment stricture. However, 2 patients (25%) were considered to have mild strictures that were easily managed with a urethral sound, and 4 (50%) had more significant stricture that required visual internal urethrotomy (VIU). 2 (18%) of the A group needed only a sound and 4 (36%) were managed via VIU. 1 (13%) of the P group reported mild stress incontinence, but the patient did not need padding. 6 (75%) of the P group had no erectile dysfunction, 1 (13%) reported a decreased quality of erection that required only oral phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor and 1 (13%) required intracavernosal injection therapy.
Conclusions
Endoscopic primary realignment of urethral injury is a simple, safe, rapid and nontraumatic technique. It reduces the incidence and extent of the complications such as stricture, erectile dysfunction and incontinence. Therefore, we recommend this endoscopic primary realignment for the initial management of posterior urethral injury, as well as for anterior urethral injury.
Table 1
Patient's characteristics
Table 2
Complications during 5 year after primary realignment
Table 3
Results of endoscopic primary realignment for prosterior urethral injury
References
-
Lee YT. Urethral injury. Korean J Urol 2006;47:221–231.
-
-
Kal WJ, Moon YT, Kim SC. Endoscopically guided primary urethral realignment as a treatment of anterior urethral rupture. Korean J Urol 1996;37:794–797.
-
-
Follis HW, Kock MO, McDougal WS. Immediate management of prostatomembranous urethral disruptions. J Urol 1992;147:1259–1262.
-
-
Husmann DA, Wilson WT, Boone TB, Allen TD. Prostatomembranous urethral disruptions: management by suprapubic cystostomy and delayed urethroplasty. J Urol 1990;144:76–78.
-
-
Pontes JE, Pierce JM Jr. Anterior urethral injuries: four years of experience at the Detroit General Hospital. J Urol 1978;120:563–564.
-
-
Jeong CS, Seo IY, Park SC, Oh SJ, Rim JS. The success rate and complications of the primary endoscopic urethral realignment within 3 days in male urethral injury. Korean J Urol 2004;45:1039–1043.
-
-
Yasuda K, Yamanishi T, Isaka S, Okano T, Masai M, Shimazaki J. Endoscopic re-establishment of membranous urethral disruption. J Urol 1991;145:977–979.
-
-
Morehouse DD, Belitsky P, MacKinnon K. Rupture of the posterior urethra. J Urol 1971;63:11–14.
-
-
Webster GD, Mathes GL, Selli C. Prostatomembranous urethral injuries: a review of the literature and a rational approach to their management. J Urol 1983;130:898–902.
-
-
Oh SJ, Rim HK, Rim JS. Results of primary endoscopic urethral realignment as a treatment of urethral injury according to the injury site. Korean J Urol 1999;40:1425–1429.
-