Korean J Urol. 2006 Jun;47(6):651-655. Korean.
Published online Jun 30, 2006.
Copyright © 2006 The Korean Urological Association
Original Article

Urachal Anomalies in Children: A Proper Approach and Treatment Based on the Recent Ten-year Experience

Byung Joo Jung, Jeong Min Seo,1 Suk Koo Lee,1 and Kwan Hyun Park
    • Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    • 1Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Received February 07, 2006; Accepted April 18, 2006.

Abstract

Purpose

To establish the proper approach and management of an urachal anomaly in children.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and imaging studies of 33 children (21 boys, 12 girls) treated for an urachal anomaly over a ten-year period.

Results

Twenty-four patients were equally diagnosed with either an urachal sinus or urachal cyst; the other nine patients were confirmed to have a patent urachus. Umbilical discharge (14 patients) and umbilical granuloma (9 patients) were the most common presentations. The 12 patients with an urachal sinus underwent ultrasonography (USG) (10; diagnostic), 2 fistulography (all; diagnostic). Those with an urachal cyst underwent either USG (6/12; diagnostic), computed tomography (CT) (3; diagnostic), fistulography (2; diagnostic), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (1; diagnostic). One subject was affected by acute appendicitis, which was confirmed by CT. Of the 9 children with patent urachus, 7 underwent USG (all; diagnostic); exploration without further imaging studies was performed on the remaining 2 subjects. Surgical excision was performed in 30 patients. Omphalomesenteric duct or Meckel's diverticulum were incidental findings, which were simultaneously repaired. Conservative treatment was successful in only 3 patients.

Conclusions

Urachal anomalies in children mainly manifest as umbilical discharges and umbilical granuloma, but may present non-specific symptoms in some cases. USG is a useful method for diagnosis, but other imaging modalities can be useful to establish the differential diagnosis. A limited number of children with urachal anomalies, mainly presenting with an umbilical discharge, can be managed conservatively. However, complete surgical excision of the lesion, with the possible associated anomalies, should be the basic scheme for children with urachal anomalies.

Keywords
Urachus; Anomalies; Children; Diagnosis; Treatment

Figures

Fig. 1
Presenting symptoms of the children with urachal anomalies.

Tables

Table 1
Presenting symptoms of the children with various forms of urachal anomalies

Table 2
Diagnostic approaches for the children with urachal anomalies

Table 3
Management and associated anomalies for the children with urachal anomalies

References

    1. Gearhart JP. Exstrophy, epispadias, and other bladder anomalies. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, editors. Campbell's urology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002. pp. 2136-2196.
    1. McCollum MO, Macneily AE, Blair GK. Surgical implications of urachal remnants: presentation and management. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:798–803.
    1. Mesrobian HG, Zacharias A, Balcom AH, Cohen RD. Ten years of experience with isolated urachal anomalies in children. J Urol 1997;158:1316–1318.
    1. Heo JM, Yoon JB. Congenital patent urachus: report of 2 cases. Korean J Urol 1994;35:1151–1155.
    1. Kang MS, Lee SW, Oh JS, Shin MK, Shin DM. A case of patent urachus. Korean J Urol 1989;30:262–265.
    1. So MW, Kim HJ, Kim BK. A case of vesicourachal diverticulum. Korean J Urol 1989;30:266–269.
    1. Yim CS, Kim ME, Lee JH, Chang DS. A case of congenital patent urachus. Korean J Urol 1982;23:715–717.
    1. Choi BN, Lim CK, Na HJ, Song CK, Ryu SB, Kim EH. A case of congenital patent urachus. Korean J Urol 1980;21:373–375.
    1. Bauer SB, Retik AB. Urachal anomalies and related umbilical disorders. Urol Clin North Am 1978;5:195–211.
    1. Cilento BG Jr, Bauer SB, Retik AB, Peters CA, Atala A. Urachal anomalies: defining the best diagnostic modality. Urology 1998;52:120–122.
    1. Leyson JF. Calcified urachal cyst. Br J Urol 1984;56:438.
    1. Diehl K. A rare case of urachal calculus. Br J Urol 1991;67:327–328.
    1. Davidson BR, Brown NJ, Neoptolemos JP. Haemorrhage into a urachal cyst presenting as an 'acute abdomen'. Postgrad Med J 1987;63:493–494.
    1. Agatstein EH, Stabile BE. Peritonitis due to intraperitoneal perforation of infected urachal cysts. Arch Surg 1984;119:1269–1273.
    1. Savanelli A, Cigliano B, Esposito G. Infected and ruptured urachal cyst causing peritonitis. Z Kinderchir 1984;39:267–268.
    1. Nair KP. Mucous metaplasia and rupture of urachal cyst as a rare cause of acute abdomen. Br J Urol 1987;59:281–282.
    1. Valda V, Conn MJ. Spontaneous rupture of a noninfected urachal cyst. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:747–748.
    1. Rich RH, Hardy BE, Filler RM. Surgery for anomalies of the urachus. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:370–372.
    1. Lane V. Congenital patent urachus associated with complete (hypospadiac) duplication of the urethra and solitary crossed renal ectopia. J Urol 1982;127:990–991.
    1. Huang CS, Luo CC, Chao HC, Chen HM, Chu SM. Urachal anomalies in children: experience at one institution. Chang Gung Med J 2003;26:412–416.
    1. Beck AD, Gaudin HJ, Bonham DG. Carcinoma of the urachus. Br J Urol 1970;42:555–562.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 1

Tables

1 / 3

PERMALINK