Published online Jun 30, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2006.47.6.620
The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Patients with a Urological Malignancy
Abstract
Purpose
The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is very common among patients with a urological malignancy. We assessed the prevalence and patterns of use of complementary therapies among patients with bladder, prostate and renal cancers.
Materials and Methods
Between May and July 2004, we conducted a survey to assess the use of CAM at 13 outpatient clinics in Korea. Seven hundred and eleven patients with bladder (269), prostate (300) or renal cancers (142) were selected to answer a self-administered questionnaire on CAM, which were then analyzed.
Results
Among 711 patients with urological malignancies, 279 (39.2%) had been treated with at least one type of CAM, in addition to conventional Western treatment. The cancer patients treated with radiation therapy or immunotherapy were more likely to employ CAM than those using other therapies. Age, gender, cancer type, occupations, religions, level of education and disease status (stable or progressive) were not associated with the prevalence of CAM. 44.3% of CAM users wanted to discuss CAM techniques with their doctors, but only 24.8% received an explanation of there use.
Conclusions
CAM is used by a large number of patients with urological malignancies, particularly in those undergoing radiation therapy or immunotherapy. Urologists need to have an accurate knowledge and apprehension of CAM. The possible effects and side effects should be defined, with appropriate guidelines recommended for patients with a urological malignancy.
Fig. 1
Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) according to treatment modality.
Fig. 2
Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) according to the degree of education.
Table 1
Patient characteristics
Table 2
Types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM)
References
-
Lee SI, Khang YH, Lee MS, Kang W, Hong CD. Complementary and alternative medicine use in Korea: prevalence, pattern of use, and out-of-pocket expenditures. Korean J Prev Med 1999;32:546–555.
-
-
Khang YH, Lee MS, Koo HJ, Kang WC, Lim BM, Lee SI. Comparison of doctors' experience with and attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine between western medicine and Korean traditional medicine in office-based settings. J Korean Acad Fam Med 1999;20:1106–1117.
-
-
Boon H, Stewart M, Kennard MA, Gray R, Sawka C, Brown JB, et al. Use of complementary/alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in Ontario: prevalence and perceptions. J Clin Oncol 2000;18:2515–2521.
-
-
Arkko PJ, Arkko BL, Kari-Koskinen O, Taskinen PJ. A survey of unproven cancer remedies and their users in an outpatient clinic for cancer therapy in Finland. Soc Sci Med 1980;14:511–514.
-
-
Yi JJ, Ohrr H, Yi SW. A study on the cost and proportion of complementary and alternative medicine in total healthcare cost among elderly in the last 6 months of life. Korean J Prev Med Public Health 2004;37:141–149.
-