Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Jul;63(4):482-482. English.
Published online Jun 29, 2022.
© The Korean Urological Association
correction

Corrigendum: Correction of the Abstract. Focal therapy for prostate cancer with irreversible electroporation: Oncological and functional results of a single institution study

William John Yaxley, Troy Gianduzzo, Boon Kua, Rachel Oxford and John William Yaxley

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Investig Clin Urol 2022;63:285-293

    https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20210472

    In this paper, the two inequality symbols in the Abstract were given incorrectly. The authors sincerely regret this error.

    The text should be as follows:

    Corrected Abstract

    Purpose: Focal irreversible electroporation (IRE) for prostate cancer aims to reduce quality of life complications, however outcomes data remains limited. We aimed to evaluate histological in-field clearance of prostate cancer at ≥12 months post-IRE.

    Materials and Methods: Retrospective review of prospectively acquired data of consecutive patients treated between August 2018 and August 2021. Significant recurrence was defined as a ≥6 mm core Gleason 3+3, or ≥Gleason 3+4 with ≥4 mm tumour length. A second definition of any focus of International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) ≥2 was also analysed.

    Results: The median follow-up of the entire cohort is 23 months (range 3–39 mo). For 64 primary IRE procedures, surveillance biopsy was performed in 40/50 (80.0%) with ≥12 months follow-up. Significant in-field recurrence occurred in 3/40 (7.5%), or 4/40 (10.0%) with any focus of ISUP ≥2. Significant out-of-field recurrence occurred in 5/40 (12.5%). In salvage IRE, three patients (3/6, 50.0%) have undetectable prostate-specific antigen levels, two have no residual cancer on biopsy and one patient had out-of-field recurrence. For sexually active men, erectile function was maintained in 24/28 (85.7%) of primary IRE. No incontinence developed in primary IRE (0/64).

    Conclusions: Focal primary IRE for prostate cancer is associated with 90% infield ablation of any ISUP grade ≥2 cancer with a low risk of urinary incontinence or impotence. Surveillance prostate biopsies are required to exclude progression despite a normal post-IRE multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Salvage IRE is a promising option for localised recurrence after prostate radiotherapy with low morbidity.


    Metrics
    Share
    PERMALINK