https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2022.1457
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and rehability of the QUIPA tool: Turkish version
Submitted: 28 September 2021
Accepted: 5 April 2022
Published: 13 September 2022
Accepted: 5 April 2022
Abstract Views: 941
PDF: 396
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The Quality Indicators for Physiotherapy Management of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis (QUIPA) is the only patient-reported outcome measure to assess the quality indicators of physiotherapy management of hip/knee osteoarthritis (OA). It consists of 3 subscales and a total of 18 questions. The purpose of this research was to translate and adapt the QUIPA into the Turkish language using a cross-cultural approach as well as test its validity and reliability for Turkish-speaking patients with hip/knee OA. Ninety-two patients with hip/knee OA were enrolled in the research. The cross-cultural adaptation of the QUIPA was performed according to guidelines defined by Beaton et al. Participants completed the QUIPA tool twice at an interval of 7 days. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were determined by interpreting the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, respectively. Construct validity was tested via exploratory factor analysis. For the first, second, and third subscales and total score of QUIPA, ICC was found to be 0.895, 0.947, 0.665, and 0.925, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.682, 0.797, 0.593, and 0.812. The Exploratory Factor Analysis demonstrated that the QUIPA tool is based on 3 factors. These results indicate that the Turkish version of the QUIPA has excellent test-retest reliability and good internal consistency. Therefore, the Turkish version of the QUIPA seems to be a valid and reliable tool to assess the quality indicators of physiotherapy management of hip/knee OA in Turkish-speaking patients. It is intended to be used in clinical settings and research works.
Sarabon N, Ceh T, Kozinc Z, Smajla D. Adapted protocol of rate of force development and relaxation scaling factor for neuromuscular assessment in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Knee. 2020; 27: 1697-707.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.09.023
Palazzo C, Nguyen C, Lefevre-Colau MM, et al. Risk factors and burden of osteoarthritis. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2016; 59: 134-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2016.01.006
Salaffi F, Carotti M, Stancati A, Grassi W. Health-related quality of life in older adults with symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched healthy controls. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005; 17: 255-63.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324607
Hunter DJ, Schofield D, Callander E. The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014; 10: 437.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2014.44
Dogan I, Unal A, Cankaya M. Economic evaluation methods in health care. Fiscaoeconomia 2019; 3: 152-68.
Teo PL, Hinman RS, Egerton T, et al. Patient-reported quality indicators to evaluate physiotherapy care for hip and/or knee osteoarthritis-development and evaluation of the QUIPA tool. BMC Muskuloskel Disord. 2020; 21: 1-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03221-5
Kolasinki SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthrit Care Res. 2020; 72: 149-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24131
Xie SH, Wang Q, Wang LQ, et al. The feasibility and effectiveness of internet-based rehabilitation for patients with knee osteoarthritis: A study protocol of randomized controlled trial in the community setting. Medicine 2020; 99: 44.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000022961
van Baar ME, Dekker J, Oostendorp RA, et al. Effectiveness of exercise in patients with osteoarthritis of hip or knee: nine months’ follow up. Ann Rheum Dis 2001; 60: 1123-30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.60.12.1123
Pisters MF, Veenhof C, van Meeteren NL, et al. Long term effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 57: 1245-53.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23009
Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for the role of exercise in the management of osteoarthritis of the hip or knee-the MOVE consensus. Rheumatology. 2005; 44: 67-73.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh399
Bennell KL, Hinman RS. A review of the clinical evidence for exercise in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. J Sci Med Sport. 2011; 14: 4-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2010.08.002
Papandony MC, Chou L, Seneviwickrama M, et al. Patients’ perceived health service needs for osteoarthritis (OA) care: a scoping systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2017; 25: 1010-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.799
Grypdonck L, Aertgeerts B, Luyten F, et al. Development of quality indicators for an integrated approach of knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2014; 41: 1155-62.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.130680
Edwards JJ, Khanna M, Jordan KP, et al. Quality indicators for the primary care of osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015; 74: 490-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203913
Basedow M, Esterman A. Assessing appropriateness of osteoarthritis care using quality indicators: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015; 21: 782-9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12402
Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care (quality improvement research). Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11: 358-64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.11.4.358
Gray-Burrows KA, Willis TA, Foy R, et al. Role of patient and public involvement in implementation research: a consensus study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018; 27: 858-64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006954
Peter WF, Jansen MJ, Hurkmans EJ, et al. Physiotherapy in hip and knee osteoarthritis: development of a practice guideline concerning initial assessment, treatment and evaluation. Acta Reumatol Port. 2011; 36: 268-81.
Hrisos S, Eccles MP, Francis JJ, et al. Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? A systematic review. Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 37.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-37
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25: 3186-91.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002; 11: 193-205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015291021312
Schouffoer AA, Strijbos E, Schuerwegh AJ, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis questionnaire (MHISS) into the Dutch language. Clin Rheumatol. 2013; 32: 1649-55.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-013-2321-4
Majumder MSM, Ahmed S, Shazzad N, et al. Translation, cross‐cultural adaptation and validation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) into Bengali in patients with chronic non‐malignant musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020; 23: 1481-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.13954
Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015; 386: 743-800.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60692-4
Cheng YJ, Hootman JM, Murphy LB, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevalence of doctor-diagnosed arthritis and arthritis-attributable activity limitation-United States, 2007-2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010; 59: 1261-5.
Nelson AE, Allen KD, Golightly YM, et al. A systematic review of recommendations and guidelines for the management of osteoarthritis: the chronic osteoarthritis management initiative of the US bone and joint initiative. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2014; 43: 701-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.11.012
Wacholder S, Armstrong B, Hartge P. Validation studies using an alloyed gold standard. Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 137: 1251-8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116627
Monticone M, Ferrante S, Rocca B, et al. Chronic pain acceptance questionnaire: confirmatory factor analysis, reliability, and validity in Italian subjects with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2013; 38: 824-31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182917299
Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res. 1998; 7: 323-35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008846618880
How to Cite
Tore, N., Oskay, D., Satıs, H., & Haznedaroglu, S. (2022). Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and rehability of the QUIPA tool: Turkish version. Reumatismo, 74(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/reumatismo.2022.1457
Copyright (c) 2022 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.