Korean Circ J. 2006 May;36(5):354-358. Korean.
Published online May 31, 2006.
Copyright © 2006 The Korean Society of Circulation
Original Article

Clinical and Electrophysiologic Characteristics and Efficacy of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of the Elderly Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Sang Rok Lee, MD, Jeong Gwan Cho, MD, Sang Yup Lim, MD, Seo Na Hong, MD, Kye Hun Kim, MD, Il Suk Sohn, MD, Young Joon Hong, MD, Hyung Wook Park, MD, Ju Han Kim, MD, Weon Kim, MD, Young Keun Ahn, MD, Myung Ho Jeong, MD, Jong Chun Park, MD and Jung Chaee Kang, MD
    • The Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Gwangju, Korea.
Received February 08, 2006; Accepted April 03, 2006.

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is the most common regular supraventricular tachycardias in both the general population and elderly patients. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical and electrophysiologic characteristics and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for treating AVNRT in the elderly.

Subjects and Methods

This study included 273 consecutive symptomatic AVNRT patients who underwent RFCA for the slow-pathway. The study population was divided into two groups: group I patients were younger than 65 years (n=227, average age: 44.6±12.9 years, male : female=89 : 138) and group II patients were older than 65 years (n=46, average age: 69.0±3.6, male : female=9 : 37). We compared the baseline clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics and the outcomes of RFCA between the two groups.

Results

The prevalence of a baseline prolonged PR interval (>200 ms) was not different between the 2 groups (1.8% vs. 6.5%, p>0.05). The baseline sinus cycle length, QT interval and AVNRT cycle length were significantly longer in group II than in group 1 (799.3±146.1 ms vs. 864.3±159.8 ms, 374.2±42.1 ms vs. 397.6±40.4 ms, 351.3±43.2 ms vs. 384.9±57.0 ms, respectively p<0.05). There was no difference in the rate of RFCA-related complications, including transient AV block. The incidence of AV block (≥second degree) was not different between the two groups (4.0% vs. 6.5%, p>0.05). One patient in group I required permanent pacemaker implantation.

Conclusion

RFCA in elderly patients is safe and effective as in younger patients. Therefore, performing RFCA for treating AVNRT should also be considered in the elderly patients.

Keywords
Catheter ablation; Tachycardia; Atrioventricular node


Metrics
Share
PERMALINK