Korean Circ J. 1996 Feb;26(1):44-51. Korean.
Published online Feb 28, 1996.
Copyright © 1996 The Korean Society of Circulation
Original Article

Left Ventricular Geometric Patterns of Dippers and Non-Dippers in Essential Hypertension

Jae Ung Lee, M.D., Kyung Soo Kim, M.D., Soon Kil Kim, M.D., Jeong Hyun Kim, M.D., Heon Kil Lim, M.D., Bang Hun Lee, M.D. and Chung Kyun Lee, M.D.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Background

    One of the unique feature of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is its ability to describe the variations of BP throughout the day and night. Left ventricular hypertrophy and other measures of target organ damage in hypertension are more closely related to the average 24-h BP than to clinic BP. In addition to the mean levels of BP, the characteristics of the 24-h BP profile might be a further determinant of organ in essential hypertension.

    Methods

    Data were obtrained from 105 patients with essential hypertension and 44 normal subjects. Echocardiography and 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were performed in all subjects. At first, relative wall thickness(RWT) and left ventrcular mass index were calculated from normal subject and normal values(RWT<0.44, LV mass index,120gm/m2) were applied to hypertensive patients which were classified to dipper and non-dipper according to the result of ambulatory monitoring.

    Results

    1) There were 49 dippers and 56 non-dipper in hypertensive patients subjects.

    2) Among the dippers, left ventricular mass index and relative wall thickness were normal in 51%, whereas 8.2% had increased relative wall thickness with normal ventricular mass(concentric remodeling), 32.7% had increased mass with normal relative wall thickness(eccentric hypertrophy) and 8.2% had typical hypertensive concentric hypertrophy.

    3) Among the non-dippers, left ventriculat mass index and relative wall thicksness were normal in 40%, whereas 41.8% had eccentric hypertophy, 16.4% had concentric hypertrophy, only 1.8% had concentric remodeling.

    4) The incidence of concentric hypertophy was significantly increased in non-dipper subjects(15.2%) than dippers(8.2%), especially in non-dipper female patients.

    5) The incidence of concentric remodeling was increased in dipper(8.2%), especially in dipper female patients.

    6) There were no difference between left ventricular geometies in duration of hypertension, ejecton fracton, fractional shortening, and cardiac index.

    7) There were no difference between dipper and non-dipper subjects in total peripheral resistance except dipper female patients(1,484±535 dynes·s·cm5).

    Conclusion

    Patterns of left ventricular hypertophy and geometric remodeling in essential hypertension may not be influenced by the duration of hypertension, but by gender, blood pressure level, diurnal rhythm and total peripheral resistance.

    Keywords
    Hypertension; Diurnal variation; Left ventricle geometry


    Metrics
    Share
    PERMALINK