Published online Aug 11, 2016.
https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2016.51.4.327
Evaluation of Clinical Applicability of Stress Radiography for Shoulder Instability: Correlation between the Degree of Displacement and the Physical Examinations
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to examine the clinical applicability of stress radiography in patients presenting with shoulder instability.
Materials and Methods
Fifty-six patients diagnosed with shoulder instability and 20 healthy volunteers participated in the study. Degree of displacement of the humeral head as measured on stress radiography using a Telos GA-IIE device was compared with the results of the physical examinations. Four types of stress radiography were captured while applying 15 daN of force anteriorly (AER0 and AER60) and posteriorly (PER0 and PER60) at two different positions: (1) 90° of abduction combined with 0° of external rotation, and (2) 90° of abduction combined with 60° of external rotation.
Results
The degree of displacement of affected shoulders of 44 patients showed significantly larger displacement than normal shoulders (p<0.05), and the comparison between 56 affected shoulders of the patients and 40 normal shoulders of the volunteers showed significantly larger displacement only in PER0 and PER60 of the patients (p<0.05). Among the four radiographs of affected shoulders, AER60 showed significantly less displacement (p=0.046). The anterior drawer test under anesthesia of 16 patients who underwent surgery for anterior instability showed positive correlation with AER0 (Spearman's rho=0.56, p<0.024). Significantly larger anterior displacement of the load and shift test was observed in the subgroup with anterior displacement more than 3 mm (p=0.028), and higher positive frequency of the Kim's test was observed in the subgroup with posterior displacement more than 3 mm (p=0.005).
Conclusion
Stress radiography using a Telos GA-IIE device could discriminate the affected shoulder. Although it could not replace individual physical examinations, the degree of displacement correlates with some physical examinations for shoulder instability.
Figure 1
The Telos device mainly consists of a lower arm positioner for external rotation (1), shoulder fixation pads (2), and a pressure support (3).
Figure 2
Examples of anterior drawer stress radiography, AER0 and AER60. After seating the patient on the chair, the patient's arm is abducted by 90° and placed on the device, the axillary portion is placed in the middle of the cassette, and the coracoid process and scapular spine are fixed on the shoulder fixation pad. The pressure support pad is placed approximately 2 cm lateral to the margin of the acromion, and by using support devices, 15 daN pressure is steadily applied toward the back (abdomen), and under 60 Kvp and 10 mA film conditions, a beam is shot vertical to the acromioclavicular joint in the forward distal 30° direction with an source-image distance of 100 cm.
Figure 3
Example of posterior drawer stress radiography measurement in a patient. A line is drawn parallel to the glenoid articular surface (1), a line is drawn bisecting the glenoid articular surface perpendicular to line 1 (2), and a line is drawn from the rotation center of the humeral head perpendicular to line 1 (3). The distance between line 1 and 2 represents the posterior displacement.
Table 1
Measured Values and Statistics from the Affected Shoulders and the Normal Shoulders of the Patients
Table 2
Measured Values and Statistics from the Affected Shoulders of the Patients and the Normal Shoulders of the Volunteers
Table 3
Intra-Group Comparison among 4 Radiographies from the Patients
Table 4
Intra-Group Comparison among 4 Radiographies from the Volunteers
Table 5
Cross-Tabulation of the Load and Shift Test and the Displacement on the Radiography
Table 6
Correlation between the Drawer Test under Anesthesia and the Displacement on the Radiography
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:The authors have nothing to disclose.
References
-
Georgousis H, Ring D. Radiographic glenohumeral joint translation evaluated with a new shoulder positioning device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996;5:S87.
-
-
Ellenbecker TS, Mattalino AJ, Elam E, Caplinger R. Quantification of anterior translation of the humeral head in the throwing shoulder. Manual assessment versus stress radiography. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:161–167.
-
-
Sauers EL, Borsa PA, Herling DE, Stanley RD. Instrumented measurement of glenohumeral joint laxity and its relationship to passive range of motion and generalized joint laxity. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:143–150.
-
-
Silliman JF, Hawkins RJ. Classification and physical diagnosis of instability of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;291:7–19.
-
-
Hawkins RJ, Bell RH. Shoulder instability: diagnosis and management. Can J Sport Sci 1987;12:67–70.
-
-
Cofield RH, Irving JF. Evaluation and classification of shoulder instability. With special reference to examination under anesthesia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;223:32–43.
-
-
Gerber C, Ganz R. Clinical assessment of instability of the shoulder. With special reference to anterior and posterior drawer tests. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984;66:551–556.
-
-
Hawkins RJ, Mohtadi NGH. Clinical evaluation of shoulder instability. Clin J Sport Med 1991;1:59–64.
-
-
Sauers EL, Borsa PA, Herling DE, Manzour WF, Stanley RD. Validity of an instrumented measurement technique for quantifying glenohumeral joint laxity and stiffness. J Athl Train 2001;36:S40.
-
-
O'Connell PW, Nuber GW, Mileski RA, Lautenschlager E. The contribution of the glenohumeral ligaments to anterior stability of the shoulder joint. Am J Sports Med 1990;18:579–584.
-