Open Access, Peer-reviewed
pISSN 1226-2102
eISSN 2005-8918
    J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2010 Jun;45(3):179-187. Korean.
    Published online Jun 09, 2010.
    https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2010.45.3.179
    Copyright © 2010 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association
    Original Article

    A Comparative Study of Three Different Bone Grafting Methods for Treatment of Scaphoid Nonunion

    Sang-Jin Cheon, M.D., Seung-Han Cha, M.D. and Hui-Taek Kim, M.D.
      • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Pusan, Korea.
    • Correspondence to: Sang-Jin Cheon, M.D. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Pusan National University, 1-10, Ami-dong, Seo-gu, Pusan 602-739, Korea. TEL: +82-51-240-7248, FAX: +82-51-247-8395, Email: scheon@pusan.ac.kr
    Received August 28, 2009; Accepted January 27, 2010.

    This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Abstract

    Purpose

    Bone graft is a widely accepted surgical treatment for scaphoid nonunion. The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare the clinical outcomes of the three different bone graft techniques, Matti-Russe technique, Fisk-Fernandez technique and vascularized bone grafting.

    Materials and Methods

    This study involved 20 cases in 20 patients of established scaphoid nonunion who were treated with three different bone graft techniques and followed up for at least 1 year. We measured preoperative and postoperative pain, Mayo Modified Wrist Score (MMWS) and range of motion of the affected and normal side. For radiological evaluation we assessed bone union, avascular necrosis, and dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI).

    Results

    There were no significant differences among the three groups with respect to the pain, MMWS, and range of motion. The union rate and correction of DISI also made no significant difference. The time to achieve bone union, which averaged 2.6 months was significantly decreased in the vascularized bone graft group than in the other two groups.

    Conclusion

    All three methods were proper surgical procedures for treatment of scaphoid nonunion because there was no statistically significant difference in clinical and radiological outcomes. Among these three methods the vascularized bone grafting had the shortest time to achieve bone union so it could result in the fast functional recovery of the patient.

    Keywords
    scaphoid; nonunion; bone graft; matti-russe; fisk-fernandez; vascularized bone graft

    Figures

    Figure 1
    A 34-year-old man who was in duced to osteosynthesis using Matti-Russe technique. (A, B) Preoperative plain radiographs show scaphoid waist fracture and nonunion. (C, D) Preoperative CT images show cystic change of proximal fragment. (E, F) Preoerative MRI images. Avascular necrosis of proximal fragment appeared. (G, H) Immediately postoperative plain radiographs. (I, J) Solid bony union was achieved in follow-up plain radiographs.

    Figure 2
    A 48-year-old man who was induced to osteosynthesis using Fisk-Fernandez technique. (A, B) A preoperative plain radiographs show scaphoid waist fracture and nonunion. (C) Preoperative CT images. (D, E) Immediate postoperative images. The fragment was fixed by Acutrek screw. And to prevent rotational displacement, additional K-wire was inserted. (F, G) Solid bony union was achieved and alignment was well maintained.

    Figure 3
    A 33-year-old man who was induced to osteosynthesis using vascularized bone graft technique. (A, B) Preoperative plain radiographs. (C, D) Immediately postoperative plain radiograph. (E, F) Last follow up plain radiographs show solid bony union. (G, H) Preoperative T2 weight MRI show low signal changes in proximal pole of scaphoid. (I-K) He was satisfied with pain free wrist ROM but, ROM was slightly decreased in the operated wrist.

    References

      1. Cooney WP 3rd, Dobyns JH, Linscheid RL. Nonunion of the scaphoid: analysis of the results from bone grafting. J hand Surg Am 1980;5:343–354.
      1. Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Dobyns JH, Wood MB. Scaphoid nonunion: Role of anterior interpositional bone grafts. J Hand Surg Am 1988;13:635–650.
      1. Tomaino MM, King J, Pizillo M. Correction of lunate malaignment when bone grafting scaphoid nonunion with humpback deformity: rationale and results of a technique revisited. J Hand Surg Am 2000;25:322–329.
      1. Nakamura R, Hori M, Horii E, Miura T. Reduction of the scaphoid fracture with DISI alignment. J Hand Surg Am 1987;12:1000–1005.
      1. Yang BK, Hahn SH, Lee SR, Chung SW, Lee DH, Seo JH. Treatment of scaphoid nonunion with inlay bone graft. J Korean Soc Surg Hand 2003;8:108–114.
      1. Jiranek WA, Ruby LK, Millender LB, Bankoff MS, Newberg AH. Long-term results after Russe bone-grafting: the effect of malunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1217–1228.
      1. Rajagopalan BM, Squire DS, Samuels LO. Result of Herbert-screw fixation with bone-grafting for the treatment of nonunion of the scaphoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:48–52.
      1. Malizos KN, Dailiana ZH, Kirou M, Vragalas V, Xenakis TA, Soucacos PN. Longstanding nonunions of scaphoid fractures with bone loss: successful reconstruction with vascularized bone grafts. J Hand Surg Br 2001;26:330–334.
      1. Park MJ, Lee JS, Shin SK. Treatment of scaphoid nonunion using a pedicled vascularized bone graft. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2006;41:871–876.
      1. Stark A, Brostrom LA, Svartengren G. Scaphoid nonunion treated with the Matti-Russe technique. Long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;214:175–180.
      1. Dooley BJ. Inlay bone grafting for nonunion of the scaphoid bone by the anterior approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1968;50:102–109.
      1. Rhee SH, Cung MS, Lee YH, et al. A comparative study on the treatment of scaphoid nonunion with matti-russe technique and fisk-fernandez technique. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2008;43:694–702.
      1. Kim JS, Yoon JO, Kim YJ, Lee CC, Kim JM. Pure cancellous chip bone graft and K-wire fixation for undisplaced scaphoid nonunion. J Korean Soc Surg Hand 2008;13:177–181.
      1. Hooning van Duyvenbode JF, Keijser LC, Hauet EJ, Obermann WR, Rozing PM. Pseudoarthrosis of the scaphoid treated by the Matti-Russe operation. A long-term review of 77 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:603–606.
      1. Mulder JD. The results of 100 cases of pseudoarthrosis in the scaphoid bone treated by the Matti-Russe operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1968;50:110–115.
      1. Shah J, Jones WA. Factors affecting the outcome in 50 cases of scaphoid nonunion treated with Herbert screw fixation. J Hand Surg Br 1998;23:680–685.
      1. Warren-Smith CD, Barton NJ. Non-union of the scaphoid: russe graft vs herbert screw. J Hand Surg Br 1988;13:83–86.
      1. Daly K, Gill P, Magnussen PA, Simonis RB. Established nonunion of the scaphoid treated by volar wedge grafting and Herbert screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:530–534.
      1. Eggli S, Fernandez DL, Beck T. Unstable scaphoid fracture nonunion: a medium-term study of anterior wedge grafting procedures. J Hand Surg Br 2002;27:36–41.
      1. Boyer MI, von Schroeder HP, Axelrod TS. Scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis of the proximal pole. Treatment with a vascularized bone graft from the dorsum of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Br 1998;23:686–690.
      1. Doi K, Oda T, Soo-Heong T, Nanda V. Free vascularized bone graft for nonunion of the scaphoid. J Hand Surg Am 2000;25:507–519.
      1. Harpf C, Gabl M, Reinhart C, et al. Small free vascularied iliac crest bone grafts in reconstruction of the scaphoid bone: a retrospective study in 60 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:664–674.
      1. Yoshifumi N, Imamura K, Hirano E. In: Wrist disorders: Natural history of chronic scaphoid fractures. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1992. pp. 153-169.
      1. Green DP. The effect of avascular necrosis on Russe bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am 1985;10:597–605.
      1. Gunal I, Ozçelik A, Gökturk E, Ada S, Demirtaş M. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative punctuate bleeding to assess the vascularity of scaphoid nonunion. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999;119:285–287.
      1. Hull WJ, House JH, Gustillo RB, Kleven L, Thompson W. The surgical approach and source of bone graft for symptomatic nonunion of the scaphoid. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;115:241–247.
      1. Trumble TE. Avascular necrosis after scaphoid fracture: a correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and histology. J Hand Surg Am 1990;15:557–564.
      1. Robbins RR, Ridge O, Carter PR. Iliac crest bone grafting and Herbert screw fixation of nonunions of the scaphoid with avascular proximal pole. J Hand Surg Am 1995;20:818–831.
      1. Merrell GA, Wolfe SW, Slade JF 3rd. Treatment of scaphoid nonunions: quantitative meta-analysis of the literature. J Hand Surg 2002;27:685–691.
      1. Waitayawinyu T, Pfaeffle HJ, McCallister WV, Nemechek NM, Trumble TE. Management of scaphoid nonunions. Orthop Clin North Am 2007;38:237–249.
    Cited by
    Crossref 1
    Google Scholar 
    MeSH Terms
    Bone Transplantation
    Humans
    Necrosis
    Pain, Postoperative
    Range of Motion, Articular
    Transplants
    Wrist
    Metrics
    Share
    Figures
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    PERMALINK