J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2008 Oct;43(5):595-600. Korean.
Published online Oct 31, 2008.
Copyright © 2008 The Korean Orthopaedic Association
Original Article

Shape and Motion of Each Lumbar Segment in Normal Korean Adults

Dong-Soo Kim, M.D., Yong-Min Kim, M.D., Eui-Sung Choi, M.D., Hyun-Chul Shon, M.D., Kyung-Jin Park, M.D., Gee-Kang Park, M.D., Eun-Myung Lee, M.D. and Hu-Shan Cui, M.D.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.

Abstract

Purpose

By achieving informations about sagittal shape and motion of each lumbar segment in normal subjects, we tried to get the standards useful in management of spinal disorders and fractures.

Materials and Methods

Thirty normal adults without any disorder on their back were adopted. L3 centered thoracolumbar (T-L) X-ray's including standing lateral, AP's in righ-tleft bending, and flexion-extension lateral were checked for each person. Cobb angles of each segment were measured. Statistical analysis was done for comparison by gender and correlation of each factors.

Results

Body shape of upper lumbar vertebrae was kyphotic but caudal bodies are changed into lordotic gradually. Disc angle was lordotic in all the discs. Segmetal motion in sagittal plane was greatest at L4-L5 (18.6°). However, segmental motion at coronal plane was largest at L3-L4 (12.6°).

Conclusion

We achieved Korean standard of shape and motion of each lumbar segment. Proportion of each factor contributing to total lumbar lordosis was evaluated also.

Keywords
Normal adult; Lumbar; Segmental; Sagittal shape; Motion

Figures

Fig. 1
Method of measuring sagittal shape of the body at standing lateral view.

Fig. 2
Lordotic shape was greatest at L5 body.

Fig. 3
Summarized patterns of sagittal shape and motion of each lumbar disc segment.

Fig. 4
The proportion of lumbar lordosis (%=degree of each factor/total lumbar lordosis).

Fig. 5
The standard of segmental shape in lumbar vertebrae (percentage of each factor on total amount of lumbar lordosis).

Fig. 6
The standard range of sagittal and coronal motions of each segment.

References

    1. Anderson GB, Murphy RW, Ortengren R, Nachemson AL. The influence of backrest inclination and lumbar support on lumbar lordosis. Spine 1979;4:52–58.
    1. Bernhardt M, Bridwell KH. Segmental analysis of the sagittal plane alignment of the normal thoracic and lumbar spines and thoracolumbar junction. Spine 1989;14:717–721.
    1. Fernand R, Fox DE. Evaluation of lumbar lordosis. A prospective and retrospective study. Spine 1985;10:799–803.
    1. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Blanke K, McEnery KW. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 1995;20:1351–1358.
    1. Hansson T, Bigos S, Beecher P, Wortley M. The lumbar lordosis in acute and chronic low-back-pain. Spine 1985;10:154–155.
    1. Jackson RP, McManus AC. Radiographic analysis of sagittal plane alignment and balance in standing volunteers and patients with low back pain matched for age, sex, and size. A prospective controlled clinical study. Spine 1994;19:1611–1618.
    1. Kim YM, Kim DS, Choi ES, et al. Results of non-fusion method in thoracolumbar and lumbar spinal fractures. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 2005;12:132–139.
    1. Lee JM. The measurement of normal thoracic kyphosis in Korean. J Korean Orthop Assoc 1982;17:772–778.
    1. Stagnara P, De Mauroy JC, Dran G, et al. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis. Spine 1982;7:335–342.
    1. Suk SL, Lee CS, Lo M, Kim WJ. Normal segmental sagittal angle of the lower dorsal and lumbosacral spine in Korean adult. J Korean Orthop Assoc 1989;24:237–244.
    1. Wood KB, Kos P, Schendel M, Persson K. Effect of patient position on the sagittal-plane profile of the thoracolumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 1996;9:165–169.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 6

PERMALINK