J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2007 Feb;42(1):77-83. Korean.
Published online Feb 28, 2007.
Copyright © 2007 The Korean Orthopaedic Association
Original Article

Clinical Evaluation using MRI and Arthroscopy after Meniscal Transplantation

Seung Hyun Cho, M.D. and Jin Goo Kim, M.D.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Inje University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the status of transplanted menisci using MRI and arthroscopy.

Materials and Methods

Between March 1998 and October 2004, twenty three patients underwent a meniscal transplant at our institution. Twenty-one out of 23 patients were available for follow-up and were evaluated an average of 44 months (range, 19 to 87 months). Four allografts were medial and 17 were lateral. There were 17 men and 4 women with ages ranging from 16 to 47 years (mean, 29.6 years). The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and the modified Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score. MRI and arthroscopic examinations were performed in 18 and 11 patients respectively.

Results

The average Lysholm score improved from 60.6 to 85.7, and that of the IKDC subjective score and modified HSS score (knee score/functional score) was 79.5 and 88/93 respectively. Six of the eleven knees that underwent the arthroscopic examinations were confirmed to be normal. The MRI evaluation revealed all the allografts to have healed completely but there was degeneration/shrinkage of the allografts, and injuries to the surrounding articular cartilage. Extrusion or subluxation of the menisci was observed in all cases.

Conclusion

Meniscal transplantation may be an effective procedure for young and active patients suffering from pain after a meniscectomy with minimal degenerative changes. However, a partial tear, extrusion or subluxation of the allograft menisci and a progression of degenerative arthritis have been reported. Therefore, more accurate and reliable surgical techniques as well as a long-term follow-up are recommended.

Keywords
Meniscal transplantation; Arthroscopic examination; Extrusion or subluxation; MRI

Figures

Fig. 1
MR image of the lateral meniscus showing the extrusion of the transplanted lateral meniscus.

Tables

Table 1
Summary of Cases

References

    1. Breitenseher MJ, Trattnig S, Dobrocky I, et al. MR imaging of meniscal subluxation in the knee. Acta Radiol 1997;38:876–879.
    1. Cameron JC, Saha S. Meniscal allograft transplantation for unicompartmental arthritis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;337:164–171.
    1. Carter TR. Meniscal allograft transplantation. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 1999;7:51–62.
    1. Chen MI, Branch TP, Hutton WC. Is it important to secure the horns during lateral meniscal transplantation? A cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 1996;12:174–181.
    1. Cooper DE, Arnoczky SP, Warren RF. Meniscal repair. Clin Sports Med 1991;10:529–548.
    1. Crues JV 3rd, Mink J, Levy TL, Lotysch M, Stoller DW. Meniscal tears of the knee: accuracy of MR imaging. Radiology 1987;164:445–448.
    1. Crues JV, Stoller DW. The menisci. In: Mink JH, Reicher MA, Creus JV, Deuttsch AL, editors. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. New York: Raven; 1992. pp. 91-136.
    1. DeHaven KE. Meniscus repair. Am J Sports Med 1999;27:242–250.
    1. Fairbanks TJ. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1948;30:664–670.
    1. Fukubayashi T, Kurosawa H. The contact area and pressure distribution pattern of the knee. Acta Orthop Scand 1980;51:871–879.
    1. Garrett JC. Meniscal transplantation: a review of 43 cases with two to seven year follow-up. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 1993;1:164–167.
    1. Hayes CW, Conway WF. Evaluation of articular cartilage: radiographic and cross-sectional imaging techniques. Radiographics 1992;12:409–428.
    1. Henning CE, Lynch MA. Current concepts of meniscal function and pathology. Clin Sports Med 1985;4:259–265.
    1. King D. The healing of semilunar cartilages. 1936. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;252:4–7.
    1. Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T, Nakajima H. Load-bearing mode of the knee joint: physical behavior of the knee joint with or without menisci. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;149:283–290.
    1. Lanzer WL, Komenda G. Changes in articular cartilage after meniscectomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;252:41–48.
    1. Levy IM, Torzilli PA, Warren RF. The effect of medial meniscectomy on anterior-posterior motion of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:883–888.
    1. McGinity JB, Geuss LF, Marvin RA. Partial or total meniscectomy: a comparative analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977;59:763–766.
    1. Milachowski KA, Weismeier K, Wirth CJ. Homologous meniscus transplantation. Experimental and clinical results. Int Orthop 1989;13:1–11.
    1. Morgan CD, Wojtys EM, Casscells CD, Casscells SW. Arthroscopic meniscal repair evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 1991;19:632–637.
    1. Northmore-Ball MD, Dandy DJ, Jackson RW. Arthroscopic, open partial, and total meniscectomy. A comparative stydy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65:400–404.
    1. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Irradiation meniscus allografts in the human knee: a two to five year follow-up study. Orthop Trans 1995;19:417.
    1. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1961;43:752–757.
    1. Patten RM, Rolfe BA. MRI of meniscal allografts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:243–246.
    1. Peterfy CG, Majumdar S, Lang P, van Dijke CF, Sack K, Genant HK. MR imaging of the arthritic knee; improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences. Radiology 1994;191:413–419.
    1. Potter HG, Rodeo SA, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. MR imaging of meniscal allografts: correlation with clinical and arthroscopic outcomes. Radiology 1996;198:509–514.
    1. Quinn SF, Brown TF. Meniscal tears diagnosed with MR imaging versus arthroscopy; how reliable a standard is arthroscopy? Radiology 1991;181:843–847.
    1. Rath E, Richmond JC, Yassir W, Albright JD, Gundogan F. Meniscal allograft transplantation. Two- to eight-year results. Am J Sports Med 2001;29:410–414.
    1. Recht MP, Resnick RJ. MR imaging of articular cartilage: current status and future directions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:283–290.
    1. Renstrom P, Johnson RJ. Anatomy and biomechanics of the menisci. Clin Sports Med 1990;9:523–538.
    1. Rodeo SA. Meniscal allograft: where do we stand? Am J Sports Med 2001;29:246–261.
    1. Staubli HU, Birrer S. The popliteus tendon and its fascicles at the popliteal hiatus: gross anatomy and functional arthroscopic evaluation with and without anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Arthroscopy 1990;6:209–220.
    1. Stollsteimer GT, Shelton WR, Dukes A, Bomboy AL. Meniscal allograft transplantation: a 1- to 5-year follow-up of 22 patients. Arthroscopy 2000;16:343–347.
    1. van Arkel ER, Goei R, de Ploeg I, de Boer HH. Meniscal allografts: evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2000;16:517–521.
    1. Verdonk P, Depaepe Y, Desmyter S, et al. Normal and transplanted lateral knee menisci: evaluation of extrusion using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2004;12:411–419.
    1. Voloshin AS, Wosk J. Shock absorption of meniscectomized and painful knees; a comparative in-vivo study. J Biomed Eng 1983;5:157–161.
    1. Walker PS, Erkman MJ. The role of the menisci in force transmission across the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;109:184–192.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 1

Tables

1 / 1

PERMALINK