J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2013 Jan;51(1):47-51. Korean.
Published online Jan 31, 2013.
Copyright © 2013 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
Case Report

Full-mouth rehabilitation with pressed ceramic technique using provisional restorations

Hyun-Sik Roh, DMD, Yi-Hyung Woo, DMD, MSD, PhD and Ahran Pae, DMD, MSD, PhD
    • Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Received September 17, 2012; Revised November 07, 2012; Accepted November 20, 2012.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

With the introduction of dental implants, restoration of missing teeth with conventional fixed or removable partial dentures is being replaced with implants. Especially, with young patients, not only longevity but also esthetic factors need to be considered. Implant restorations provide long-term success functionally but, esthetic complications such as, marginal exposure due to gingival recession, loss of the papilla and dark color of metal abutments may occur. Recently, zirconia restorations with CAD/CAM technology provide functional, biocompatible and esthetic restorations possible. All-ceramic restorations using the pressed ceramic technique show better fracture toughness values than those of the conventional porcelain veneering technique. Pressed ceramic technique creates the veneer design in wax and the lost wax technique is used to create the restoration. The final contour of the restoration may be controlled during wax-up. A 22-year old female patient was restored with dental implants and zirconia restorations using the pressed ceramic technique presenting short-term but optimistic prognosis.

Keywords
Zirconia; Pressed ceramic technique; Provisional restorations

Figures

Fig. 1
A: Panoramic view before treatment, B: Frontal view before treatment.

Fig. 2
Mounted diagnostic wax-up.

Fig. 3
A, B: Cervical gingival level before diagnostic provisional restoration, C, D: Cervical gingival level after diagnostic provisional restoration.

Fig. 4
Palatal view after wax-up of the final restoration.

Fig. 5
Gum tissue replication using the molded provisional restoration.

Fig. 6
A: Wax-up pattern for the posterior prostheses before IPS e.max ZirPress casting, B: Anterior prostheses after IPS e.max Press casting.

Fig. 7
Final restoration after stain procedure.

Fig. 8
Intraoral view of definitive prosthesis. A: maxillary arch, B: mandibular arch.

References

    1. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389–404.
    1. Bello A, Jarvis RH. A review of esthetic alternatives for the restoration of anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:437–440.
    1. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoğlu E. Clinical success of zirconia in dental applications. J Prosthodont 2010;19:64–68.
    1. Raigrodski AJ, Hillstead MB, Meng GK, Chung KH. Survival and complications of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:170–177.
    1. Wolf D, Bindl A, Schmidlin PR, Lüthy H, Mörmann WH. Strength of CAD/CAM-generated esthetic ceramic molar implant crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:609–617.
    1. Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen JA. Three-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:445–451.
    1. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478–484.
    1. Stawarczyk B, Ozcan M, Roos M, Trottmann A, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH. Load-bearing capacity and failure types of anterior zirconia crowns veneered with overpressing and layering techniques. Dent Mater 2011;27:1045–1053.
    1. Lin WS, Ercoli C, Feng C, Morton D. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics. J Prosthodont 2012;21:353–362.
    1. Zitzmann NU, Krastl G, Hecker H, Walter C, Waltimo T, Weiger R. Strategic considerations in treatment planning: deciding when to treat, extract, or replace a questionable tooth. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:80–91.
    1. Glauser R, Sailer I, Wohlwend A, Studer S, Schibli M, Schärer P. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:285–290.
    1. Reshad M, Cascione D, Aalam AA. Fabrication of the mandibular implant-supported fixed restoration using CAD/CAM technology: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2009;102:271–278.
    1. Zembic A, Sailer I, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH. Randomized-controlled clinical trial of customized zirconia and titanium implant abutments for single-tooth implants in canine and posterior regions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:802–808.
    1. Choi JE, Waddell JN, Torr B, Swain MV. Pressed ceramics onto zirconia. Part 1: Comparison of crystalline phases present, adhesion to a zirconia system and flexural strength. Dent Mater 2011;27:1204–1212.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 8

PERMALINK