J Korean Acad Nurs. 2014 Apr;44(2):209-218. Korean.
Published online Apr 30, 2014.
© 2014 Korean Society of Nursing Science
Original Article

Development and Validity of Workplace Bullying in Nursing-Type Inventory (WPBN-TI)

Younju Lee,1 and Mihyoung Lee2
    • 1Department of Nursing, JEI University, Incheon, Korea.
    • 2Department of Nursing, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Received January 02, 2014; Revised February 04, 2014; Accepted March 27, 2014.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) If the original work is properly cited and retained without any modification or reproduction, it can be used and re-distributed in any format and medium.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to assess bullying of nurses, and test the validity and reliability of the instrument.

Methods

The initial thirty items of WPBN-TI were identified through a review of the literature on types bullying related to nursing and in-depth interviews with 14 nurses who experienced bullying at work. Sixteen items were developed through 2 content validity tests by 9 experts and 10 nurses. The final WPBN-TI instrument was evaluated by 458 nurses from five general hospitals in the Incheon metropolitan area. SPSS 18.0 program was used to assess the instrument based on internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity.

Results

WPBN-TI consisted of 16 items with three distinct factors (verbal and nonverbal bullying, work-related bullying, and external threats), which explained 60.3% of the total variance. The convergent validity and determinant validity for WPBN-TI were 100.0%, 89.7%, respectively. Known-groups validity of WPBN-TI was proven through the mean difference between subjective perception of bullying. The satisfied criterion validity for WPBN-TI was more than .70. The reliability of WPBN-TI was Cronbach's α of .91.

Conclusions

WPBN-TI with high validity and reliability is suitable to determine types of bullying in nursing workplace.

Keywords
Workplace bullying; Nurses; Instrument development

Figures

Figure 1
Framework for theoretical phase of types of workplace bullying.

Tables

Table 1
Demographic Characteristics of Participants (N=458)

Table 2
Rotated Factor Pattern Matrix and Communality of WPBN-TI

Table 3
Multitrait/Multi-item Matrix of WPBN-TI (Correlation Matrix Corrected for Overlap)

Table 4
Difference between Subjective Workplace Bullying Victimization and WPBN-TI

Table 5
Correlations between the WPBN-TI and NAQ-R

Notes

This manuscript is a based on a part of the first author's doctoral dissertation from Inha University.

This work was supported by INHA University Research Grant.

References

    1. Pearson CM, Andersson LM, Porath CL. Workplace incivility. In: Fox S, Spector PE, editors. Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004. pp. 177-200.
    1. Rutherford A, Rissel C. A survey of workplace bullying in a health sector organisation. Aust Health Rev 2004;28(1):65–72.
    1. Abe K, Henly SJ. Bullying (ijime) among Japanese hospital nurses: Modeling responses to the revised negative acts questionnaire. Nurs Res 2010;59(2):110–118.
    1. Berry PA, Gillespie GL, Gates D, Schafer J. Novice nurse productivity following workplace bullying. J Nurs Scholarsh 2012;44(1):80–87.
    1. Nam W, Kim JW, Kim YK, Koo JW, Park CY. The reliability and validity of the negative acts questionnaire-revised (NAQ-R) for nurses for the assessment of workplace bullying. Korean J Occup Environ Med 2010;22(2):129–139.
    1. Park KO, Kim SY, Kim JK. Hospital nurses' experience of bullying in the workplace and burnout, organizational commitment, turnover intention and nursing productivity. J Korean Clin Nurs Res 2013;19(2):169–180.
    1. Lee Y, Lee M, Bernstein K. Effect of workplace bullying and job stress on turnover intention in hospital nurses. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2013;22(2):77–87.
    1. Vessey JA, Demarco R, DiFazio R. Bullying, harassment, and horizontal violence in the nursing workforce: The state of the science. Annu Rev Nurs Res 2010;28:133–157.
    1. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Notelaers G. Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the negative acts questionnaire-revised. Work Stress 2009;23(1):24–44.
    1. Losa Iglesias ME, Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo R. Prevalence of bullying at work and its association with self-esteem scores in a Spanish nurse sample. Contemp Nurse 2012;42(1):2–10.
    1. Jacobson KJL, Hood JN, Van Buren III HJ. Workplace bullying across cultures: A research agenda. Int J Cross Cult Manag 2014;14(1):47–65.
    1. Kim MS. Role of self-leadership in the relationship between organizational culture and informatics competency. J Korean Acad Nurs 2009;39(5):731–740.
    1. Min S, Kim HS. Correlation between perception of nurses about transformational leadership and nursing performance. Daehan J Bus 2005;18(2):871–885.
    1. Kang H. A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. J Korean Acad Nurs 2013;43(5):587–594.
    1. Waschgler K, Ruiz-Hernández JA, Llor-Esteban B, Jiménez-Barbero JA. Vertical and lateral workplace bullying in nursing: Development of the hospital aggressive behaviour scale. J Interpers Violence 2013;28(12):2389–2412.
    1. Lee YJ, Bernstein K, Lee M, Nokes KM. Bullying in nursing workplace: Applying evidence using a conceptual framework. Nurs Econ. 2014
      Forthcoming.
    1. Lee Y. In: The conceptual development and development of new instruments to measure bullying in nursing workplace [dissertation]. Incheon: Inha University; 2014.
    1. Park HS. In: Behavior and attitude on pilot Korean-DRG system among doctors and nurses [master's thesis]. Busan: Inje University; 2002.
    1. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;35(6):382–385.
    1. Williams B, Brown T, Onsman A. Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. J Emerg Prim Health Care 2010;8(3):Article 990399.
    1. Han SS, Lee SC. In: SPSS nursing and health statistical analysis. Seoul: Hyunmoon; 2006.
    1. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. In: SF-36 health survey: Manual and institute. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
    1. Cho YH, Hong YR, Lee AM, Kim MK, Lee HJ, Han AK, et al. Experience of verbal abuse, emotional response, and ways to deal with verbal abuse against nurses in hospital. Korean J Occup Health Nurs 2011;20(3):270–278.
    1. Lee SH, Chung SE. Nurses's experience of verbal violence in hospital setting. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm 2007;13(4):526–536.
    1. Seo YN, Leather P, Coyne I. South Korean culture and history: The implications for workplace bullying. Aggress Violent Behav 2012;17(5):419–422.
    1. Johnson SL. International perspectives on workplace bullying among nurses: A review. Int Nurs Rev 2009;56(1):34–40.
    1. Han KS, Choi MY, Lee SJ. Experiences of job stress-coping in health care professionals. Korean J Stress Res 2013;21(2):131–139.
    1. Hutchinson M, Wilkes L, Vickers M, Jackson D. The development and validation of a bullying inventory for the nursing workplace. Nurse Res 2008;15(2):19–29.
    1. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL. The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL, editors. Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2011. pp. 3-39.
    1. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. In: Multivariate data analysis: With readings. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan Pulishing Company; 1992.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 1

Tables

1 / 5

Funding Information
PERMALINK