Open Access, Peer-reviewed
eISSN 2093-758X
    J Korean Acad Nurs. 2012 Oct;42(5):632-643. Korean.
    Published online Oct 31, 2012.
    https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.5.632
    © 2012 Korean Society of Nursing Science
    Original Article

    Development and Validation of a Tool for Evaluating Core Competencies in Nursing Cancer Patients on Chemotherapy

    Sung Hae Kim,1 and Jae Hyun Park2
      • 1Department of Medical Education, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul Center for Innovation in Nursing Education, Chung Ang University Red Cross College of Nursing, Seoul, Korea.
      • 2Department of Medical Education, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
    • Address reprint requests to: Kim, Sung Hae. Department of Medical Education, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, 1 Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-701, Korea. Tel: +82-2-961-9102, Fax: +82-2-969-6958, Email: sunghae.kim@khu.ac.kr
    Received January 09, 2012; Accepted September 19, 2012.

    Abstract

    Purpose

    This study was done to develop tool to evaluate the core competencies regarding nursing cancer patients on chemotherapy, and to verify the reliability and efficacy of the developed tool.

    Methods

    A tool to evaluate the core competencies was developed from a preliminary tool consisting of 112 items verified by expert groups. The adequacy of the preliminary tool was analyzed and refined to the final evaluation tool containing 76 items in 8 core competencies and 18 specific competencies. The evaluation tool is in the form of a self-report, and each item is evaluated according to a 3-point scale. From September 22 to October 14, 2011, 349 survey responses were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 and the WINSTEPS program that employs the Rasch model.

    Results

    Results indicated that there were no inappropriate items and the items had low levels of difficulty in comparison with the knowledge levels of the study participants. The results of factor analysis yielded 18 factors, and the reliability of the tools was very high with Cronbach's α=.97.

    Conclusion

    The results of this study can be used for training and evaluation of core competencies for nursing cancer patients, and for standardizing nursing practices associated with chemotherapy.

    Keywords
    Chemotherapy; Cancer; Nursing; Competence; Assessment

    Figures

    Figure 1
    Research procedure.

    Figure 2
    Item person map of evaluating core competencies for nursing cancer patients on chemotherapy (N=307).

    Figure 3
    Provability curves of evaluating core competencies for nursing cancer patients on chemotherapy.

    Tables

    Table 1
    Item for Evaluating Core Competencies in Nursing Cancer Patients on Chemotherapy

    Table 2
    General Characteristics of Participants (N=349)

    Table 3
    The Result of Item Difficulty (N=307)

    Notes

    This article is a revision of the first author's master's thesis from Kyung Hee University.

    References

      1. Azzoli CG, Temin S, Aliff T, Baker S Jr, Brahmer J, Johnson DH, et al. 2011 focused update of 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3825–3831.
        http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.34.2774.
      1. Berterö C, Chamberlain Wilmoth M. Breast cancer diagnosis and its treatment affecting the self: A meta-synthesis. Cancer Nurs 2007;30:194–202.
        http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NCC.0000270707.80037.4c.
      1. Bond TG, Fox CM. In: Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human science. 2nd ed. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates Publisher London; 2007.
      1. Chi EL, Chae SH. In: Theory and practice of Rasch model. 1st ed. Gyeonggi-do: Kyoyook-kwahaksa; 2000.
      1. Choi JS, Eun Y. A study on the clinical competence according to clinical ladder of operating room nurses. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2006;12:60–69.
      1. da Costa Vargens OM, Berterö CM. Living with breast cancer: Its effect on the life situation and the close relationship of women in Brazil. Cancer Nurs 2007;30:471–478.
        http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NCC.0000300157.83144.fb.
      1. Ha NS, Choi J. An analysis of nursing competency affecting on job satisfaction and nursing performance among clinical nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm 2010;16:286–294.
      1. Hall LW, Moore SM, Barnsteiner JH. Quality and nursing: Moving from a concept to core competency. Urol Nurs 2008;28:417–425.
      1. Kang YS, Lee SJ, Kim IJ, Ahn KH. A measurement scale development of nursing competence for nurses working in general wards. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm 2008;14:219–228.
      1. Kim GM, Park SY, Lee CH. A Rasch analysis of the Korean version of Oswestry Disability Questionnaire according to general characteristics of patients with low back pain. J Korean Acad Univ Trained Phys Ther 2011;18(2):35–42.
      1. Kim MY, Park SA. An methodology research of performance appraisal tool of oncology advanced practice nurse. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm 2007;13:17–23.
      1. Kim R, Sung DK, Lee HB, Song KS, Jo TK, Lee SC. In: Comprehension and utilize of statistic analysis. Daegu: Daemyung Press; 2005.
      1. Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing. Nursing education core competency assessment. Seoul: Author; 2011.
      1. Kwak MK, Kim EJ, Lee ER, Kwon IG, Hwang MS. Characteristics and quality of life in patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. J Korean Oncol Nurs 2010;10:231–239.
        http://dx.doi.org/10.5388/jkon.2010.10.2.231.
      1. Lee IS, Hong SH, Shin EK. Rasch rating scale modeling of the disability identity scale. Korean J Soc Welf 2007;59(4):273–296.
      1. Lenburg CB. The framework, concepts and methods of the competency outcomes and performance assessment (COPA) model. Online J Issues Nurs 1999;4:Manuscript 2.
      1. Lenburg CB, Klein C, Abdur-Rahman V, Spencer T, Boyer S. The COPA model: A comprehensive framework designed to promote quality care and competence for patient safety. Nurs Educ Perspect 2009;30:312–317.
      1. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;35:382–385.
      1. National Cancer Center, & Ministry of Health & Welfare. Cancer facts & figures 2011. Gyeonggi-do: Author; 2011.
      1. Park EY, Park SY. The analysis of the child-rearing attitude test appropriateness by Rasch rating scale modeling. Educ J Phys Mult Disabl 2008;51(4):117–136.
      1. Peppercorn JM, Smith TJ, Helft PR, Debono DJ, Berry SR, Wollins DS, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology statement: Toward individualized care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:755–760.
        http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.33.1744.
      1. Scott Tilley DD. Competency in nursing: A concept analysis. J Contin Educ Nurs 2008;39:58–64.
        http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20080201-12.
      1. Shin H, Kim BJ, Kang HS. Use of physical assessment skills and education needs of advanced practice nurses and nurse specialists. J Korean Acad Nurs 2009;39:709–719.
        http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.5.709.
      1. Webb PM, Cummings MC, Bain CJ, Furnival CM. Changes in survival after breast cancer: Improvements in diagnosis or treatment? Breast 2004;13:7–14.
        http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9776(03)00129-2.
    Cited by
    Crossref 7
    Google Scholar 
    PubMed Central 3
    Web of Science 3
    MeSH Terms
    Nursing Evaluation Research*
    Program Development*
    Adult
    Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use*
    Female
    Focus Groups
    Humans
    Male
    Neoplasms/drug therapy*
    Nurse's Practice Patterns
    Nurse-Patient Relations
    Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology*
    Program Evaluation
    Questionnaires
    Metrics
    Share
    Links to
    Figures
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    Tables
    slide
    slide
    slide

    1 / 3

    PERMALINK