Angus, R.B. 1970 a. A revision of the beetles of the genus Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) subgenera Orphelophorus d'Orchymont, Gephelophorus Sharp and Meghelophorus Kuwert. Acta zool. fenn. 129. 62 pp.Google Scholar

Angus, R.B. 1970 b. Revisional studies on east Palaearctic and some Nearctic species of Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Ergebnisse der zoologischen Forschungen von Dr. Z. Kaszab in der Mongolei (No. 226). Acta zool. hung. 16: 249–290.Google Scholar

Angus, R.B. 1970 c. Helophorus orientalis (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae), a parthenogenetic water beetle from Siberia and North America, and a British Pleistocene fossil. Can. Ent. 102: 129–143.Google Scholar

Angus, R.B. 1973. The habitats, life histories and immature stages of Helophorus F. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 125: 1–26, 4 pl.Google Scholar

Balfour-Browne, J. 1958. La réserve naturelle intégrale du Mont Nimba. VI. Coléoptères Hydrophiloides. Mem. Inst. fr. Afr. noire: 169–190.Google Scholar

Bedel, L.E.M. 1881. Faune des Coléoptères du bassin de la Seine (et de ses bassins secondaires). Vol. I. Appendix to Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 24 + 360 pp.Google Scholar

Bedel, L.E.M. 1891. Synopsis des grands Hydrophiles (Genre Stethoxus Solier). Rev. Ent. 10: 306–323.Google Scholar

Berge Henegouwen van, A. 1986. Revision of the European species of Anacaena Thomson (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Ent. Scand. 17: 393–407.Google Scholar

Berthold, A.A. 1827. Latreille's natürliche Familien des Thierreiches. (German translation von Latreille: Families naturelles.… 1825). Weimar. 8 + 602 pp.Google Scholar

Bertrand, H.P.I. 1972. Larves et nymphes des coléoptères aquatiques du globe…. Paris. 804 pp.Google Scholar

Bertrand, H.P.I. 1977. Larves et nymphes des coléoptères aquatiques du globe. Errata et addenda. Abbeville, 19 pp.Google Scholar

Blatchley, W.S. 1910. An illustrated descriptive catalogue of the Coleoptera or beetles (exclusive of Rhynchophora) known to occur in Indiana. Indianapolis. 1386 pp.Google Scholar

Blatchley, W.S. 1923. Notes on the Coleoptera from southern Florida with descriptions of new species. Can. Ent. 55: 13–20.Google Scholar

Böving, A.G., and Craighead, F.C.. 1931. An illustrated synopsis of the principal larval forms of the order Coleoptera. Entomologica am. N.S. 11: 1–351, 125 pl.Google Scholar

Böving, A.G., and Henriksen, K.L.. 1939. The developmental stages of the Danish Hydrophilidae (Ins., Coleoptera). Vidensk. Meddr. dansk nat. Foren. 102: 27–162.Google Scholar

Brown, W.J. 1929. Some new species of Coleoptera. Can. Ent. 61: 108–110.Google Scholar

Brown, W.J. 1931. New species of Coleoptera (II). Can. Ent. 63: 115–122.Google Scholar

Brown, W.J. 1937. The Coleoptera of Canada's eastern arctic. Can. Ent. 69: 106–111.Google Scholar

Brown, W.J. 1940 a. Notes on the American distribution of some species of Coleoptera common to the European and North American continents. Can. Ent. 72: 65–78.Google Scholar

Brown, W.J. 1940 b. Some new and poorly known species of Coleoptera. Can. Ent. 72: 182–187.Google Scholar

Casey, T. 1884. Contributions to the descriptive and systematic coleopterology of North America. Part I. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc: 1–60.Google Scholar

Cheary, B.S. 1971. The biology, ecology and systematics of the genus Laccobius (Laccobius) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) of the New World. Riverside. 178 pp.Google Scholar

Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1927. Helophorus aquaticus L. in America. Psyche 34: 174–175.Google Scholar

Erichson, W.F. 1837–1839. Die Käfer der Mark Brandenburg I. Berlin. 740 pp.Google Scholar

Eschscholtz, J.F. 1822. Entomographien. Erste Lieferung. Berlin. 128 + 3 pp., 2 col. pl.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J.C. 1775. Systema Entomologiae…………………‥Flensburgi et Lipsiae. 30 + 832 pp.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J.C. 1781. Species Insectorum … Vol. I and II. Hamburgi et Kilii. Vol. I, 8 + 552 pp.; Vol. II, 517 pp.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J.C. 1792. Entomologia Systematica. I, 2. Hafniae. 538 pp.Google Scholar

Fall, H.C. 1901. List of the Coleoptera of Southern California, with notes on habits and distribution and descriptions of new species. Occ. Pap. Calif. Acad. Sci. 8: 1–282.Google Scholar

Fall, H.C. 1924 a. New species of North American Hydrobiini. JIN.Y. ent. Soc. 32: 85–99.Google Scholar

Fall, H.C. 1924 b. Some notes on Cercyon, with descriptions of three new species. Psyche 31: 247–253.Google Scholar

Forster, J.R. 1771. Novae species Insectorum, Centuria I. London. 8 + 100 pp.Google Scholar

Ganglbauer, L. 1904. Die Käfer von Mitteleuropa IV.1. Wien. 286 pp.Google Scholar

Gemminger, M., and Harold, E.. 1868. Catalogus Coleopterorum hucusque descriptorum synonymicus et systematicus. Tom II. Monachii. pp. 425–978.Google Scholar

Gentili, E. 1985. I Laccobius americani – I. I Laccobius del Canada (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mus. A. Stoppani Sem. Arcivesc. Milano, 6° Annuario (N.S.) 1983: 31–45.Google Scholar

Germar, E.F. 1824. Insectorum species novae aut minus cognitae descriptionibus illustratae. Coleoptera. Halae. 24 + 624 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar

Green, J.W. 1946. A new species of Enochrus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 72: 61–631 pl.Google Scholar

Gundersen, R.W. 1977. New species and taxonomic changes in the genus Enochrus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 31: 251–272.Google Scholar

Gundersen, R.W. 1978. Nearctic Enochrus. Biology, keys, descriptions and distribution (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). St. Cloud, Minnesota. 54 pp.Google Scholar

Gyllenhal, L. 1808. Insecta Suecica descripta. Clasis I. Coleoptera sive Eleutherata. Vol. I, pars 1. Scaris572 pp.Google Scholar

Hardy, A.R., Cheary, B.S., and Malcolm, S.E.. 1981. A clarification of the authorship of some names in Laccobius Erichson (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 57: 303–305.Google Scholar

Hatch, M.H. 1946. Notes on European Coleoptera in Washington, including a new species of Megasternum. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 22: 77–80.Google Scholar

Hatch, M.H. 1965. The beetles of the Pacific Northwest, Part IV. Univ. Wash. Publs Biol. 16. IX + 268 pp.Google Scholar

Hellman, J.L. 1975. A taxonomic revision of the genus Hydrochus of North America, Central America and West Indies. Univ. of Maryland. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar

Herbst, J.F.W. 1797. Natursystem aller bekannten in- und ausländischen Insecten … Vol. 7. Berlin. 346 pp pl. 96–116.Google Scholar

Hilsenhoff, W.L., and Tracy, B.H.. 1982. A new species of Hydrochara (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) from the western Great Lakes region. Great Lakes Ent. 15: 99–102.Google Scholar

Hope, F.W. 1838. The Coleopterists Manual…Vol. 2. Predaceous land and water beetles. London. 168 pp 24 col. pl.Google Scholar

Horn, G.H. 1873. Revision of the genera and species of the tribe Hydrobiini. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 13: 118–137.Google Scholar

Horn, G.H. 1876. Synoptic tables of some genera of Coleoptera, with notes and synonymy. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 5: 246–252.Google Scholar

Horn, G.H. 1890 a. Notes on some Hydrobiini of Boreal America. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 17: 237–278.Google Scholar

Horn, G.H. 1890 b. A revision of Sphaeridiini inhabiting Boreal America. Trans Am. ent. Soc. 17: 279–314.Google Scholar

Hosseinie, S.O. 1976 a. Comparative life histories of three species of Tropisternus in the laboratory (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 61: 261–268.Google Scholar

Hosseinie, S.O. 1976 b. Comparative studies on developmental stages of three species of Tropisternus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 61: 847–857.Google Scholar

Illiger, J.C.W. 1798. Verzeichnis der Käfer Preussens. Halle. 42 + 510 pp.Google Scholar

Illiger, J.C.W. 1801. Magazin für Insectenkunde. Vol. 1, Heft 1–2. Braunschweig. 8 + 260 pp.Google Scholar

Jeannel, R. 1955. L'édéage. Initiation aux recherches sur la systématique des Coléoptères. Publs Mus. natn. Hist. nat. 16. 155 pp.Google Scholar

Kellen, W.R. 1953. A quantitative sampler for aquatic insects. J. econ. Ent.: 913–914.Google Scholar

Knisch, A. 1922. Hydrophiliden-Studien (Op. 10). Arch. Naturgesch. 88. A (5): 87–126.Google Scholar

Knisch, A. 1924. Zwei neue nearktische Palpicornier (Col. Hydrophilidae Op. 13). Ent. Anz. 4: 55–56.Google Scholar

Laporte, F.L. (Castelnau). 1840. Histoire Naturelle des Animaux Articulés. Vol. 2. Nécrophages – Trimères Paris. 564 pp., pl. 1–38.Google Scholar

LaRivers, I. 1949. Entomic nematode literature from 1926 to 1946 exclusive of medical and veterinary titles. Wasmann Club Collect. 7: 177–206.Google Scholar

Leach, W.E. 1815. Entomology. In Brewster, Edinburgh Encyclopaedic Vol. 9. Edinburgh, pp. 57–172.Google Scholar

Leach, W.E. 1817. The Zoological Miscellany. Vol. II. London. 151 pp., pl. 121–150.Google Scholar

LeConte, J.L. 1850. General remarks upon the Coleoptera of Lake Superior. In Agassiz, Lake Superior. Vol. IV. Boston, p. 201–242.Google Scholar

LeConte, J.L. 1851–1852. Descriptions of new species of Coleoptera, from California. Ann. Lyceum nat. Hist. New York 5: 125–216.Google Scholar

LeConte, J.L. 1855. Synopsis of the Hydrophilidae of the United States. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 7: 356–375.Google Scholar

LeConte, J.L. 1859. The Coleoptera of Kansas and eastern New Mexico. Smithson. Contr. Knowl. 11. 6 + 58 pp 2 pl.Google Scholar

LeConte, J.L. 1861 a. Classification of the Coleoptera of North America. Washington. 25 + 286 pp.Google Scholar

LeConte, J.L. 1861 b. New species of Coleoptera inhabiting the Pacific district of the United States. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 13: 338–359.Google Scholar

LeConte, J.L. 1863. New species of North American Coleoptera. Part I. Smithson. Misc. Colins 167. 177 pp.Google Scholar

Leech, H.B. 1948 a. Some nearctic species of palpicorn water beetles, new and old (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Wasmann Club Collect. 7: 33–46.Google Scholar

Leech, H.B. 1948 b. Contributions toward a knowledge of the insect fauna of Lower California. No. 11. Coleoptera: Haliplidae, Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae, Hydrophilidae, Limnebiidae. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (4) 24: 375–4483, 2 pl.Google Scholar

Leech, H.B. 1950. New species and subspecies of nearctic water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae and Hydrophilidae). Wasmann Club Collect. 7 (1949): 243–256.Google Scholar

Leech, H.B. 1956. (Aquatic Coleoptera, part), pp. 293–371in Usinger, R.L. (Ed.), Aquatic Insects of California. Berkeley. 508 pp.Google Scholar

Leng, C.W., and Mutchler, A.J.. 1918. Insects of Florida. V. The water beetles. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 38: 73–116.Google Scholar

Linné, C. 1758. Systema Naturae…. ed. X, Vol. I. Holmiae. 2 + 824 pp.Google Scholar

Linné, C. 1761. Fauna Suecica. Ed. 2. Stockholmiae. 578 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar

Malcolm, S.E. 1971. The water beetles of Maine: including the Families Gyrinidae, Haliplidae, Dytiscidae, Noteridae, and Hydrophilidae. Univ. Maine. Tech. Bull. 48. 49 pp.Google Scholar

Malcolm, S.E. 1979. Two new species of Laccobius from eastern North America (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Jl. N.Y. ent. Soc. 87: 59–65.Google Scholar

Mannerheim, C.G. 1843. Beitrag zur Kaefer-Fauna der Aleutischen Inseln, der Insel Sitkha und Neu-Californiens. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 16, 2: 175–314.Google Scholar

Mannerheim, C.G. 1852. Zeiter Nachtrag zur Kaefer-Fauna der Nord-Amerikanischen Laender des Russischen Reiches. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 25, 2: 283–387.Google Scholar

Mannerheim, C.G. 1853. Dritter Nachtrag zur Kaefer-Fauna der Nord-Amerikanischen Laender des Russischen Reiches. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 26, 3: 95–273.Google Scholar

Marsham, T. 1802. Entomologia Britannica. I. Coleoptera. London. 31 + 548 pp.Google Scholar

Matta, J.F. 1974. The Insects of Virginia: No. 8. The aquatic Hydrophilidae of Virginia (Coleoptera: Polyphaga). Res. Div. Bull. 94. Virg. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg. 44 pp.Google Scholar

Matta, J.F. 1982. The bionomics of two species of Hydrochara (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) with descriptions of their larvae. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 84: 461–467.Google Scholar

McCorkle, D.V. 1965. (Subfamily Elophorinae). pp. 23–38. in Hatch, M.H. (Ed.), The Beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part IV. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 16. 268 pp.Google Scholar

Melsheimer, F.. 1846. Descriptions of new species of Coleoptera of the United States. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 2 (1844–1845): 26–53, 98–118.Google Scholar

Merritt, R.W., and Cummins, K.W. (Eds.). 1984. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 2nd ed.Dubuque. 722 pp.Google Scholar

Miller, D.C. 1963. Paracymus tarsalis, a new species from the northwestern United States (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 17: 91–93.Google Scholar

Miller, D.C. 1964. Notes on Enochrus and Cymbiodyta from the Pacific Northwest (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 18: 69–78.Google Scholar

Miller, D.C. 1965 a. Notes on northwestern Berosus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) with two new species. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 73: 28–33.Google Scholar

Miller, D.C. 1965 b. Three new species of Crenitis from the Pacific Northwest (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 19: 33–36.Google Scholar

Miller, D.C. 1965 c. (Family Hydrophilidae exclusive Helophorinae and Sphaeridiinae). In Hatch, M.H. (Ed.), The Beetles of the Pacific Northwest. Part IV. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 16. 268 pp.Google Scholar

Miller, D.C. 1965 d. New Laccobius (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) from the Pacific Northwest with notes on previously named species. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 73: 56–62.Google Scholar

Miller, D.C. 1974. Revision of the New World Chaetarthria (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Entomologica Am. 49: 1–123.Google Scholar

Motschulsky, V. 1845. Observations sur le musée entomologique de l'université impériale de Moscou. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 18, 3: 332–388, pl. V–VII.Google Scholar

Motschulsky, V. 1853. Hydrocanthares de la Russie, catalogisés par M. Helsingfors. Helsingfors. 15 pp.Google Scholar

Motschulsky, V. 1859. Coléoptères nouveaux de Californie. Bull. Soc. imp. natural. Moscow 32, 2: 122–185.Google Scholar

Motschulsky, V. 1860. Coléoptères de la Sibérie orientale et particulier des rives de l'Amour (rapportés par Schrenck, Maack, Ditmar, Voznessenski). In Schrenck, Reisen und Forschungen im Amurlande. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg. pp. 79–257, 6 col. pl., 1 map.Google Scholar

Moulins, M. 1960. Contribution à la connaissance de quelques types larvaires d'Hydrophilidae. Trav. Lab. zool. Dijon 30: 1–416 + 7; 42 pl.Google Scholar

Müller, O.F. 1764. Fauna Insectoram Fridrichsdalina…. Hafniae et Lipsiae. 24 + 96 pp.Google Scholar

Mulsant, E. 1844. Histoire naturelle de Coléoptères de France. Palpicoraes. Paris. 7 + 196 pp., 1 pl.Google Scholar

Notman, H. 1919. Coleoptera collected at Mooers, Clinton Co. N.Y. September 9–13, with descriptions of new species. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 14: 129–141.Google Scholar

Notman, H. 1920. Coleoptera collected at Windsor, Broome Co., N.Y., 26 May to 5 June, 1918, with notes and descriptions. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 28: 178–194.Google Scholar

d'Orchymont, A. 1919. Contribution à l'étude des sous-familles des Sphaeridiinae et les Hydrophilinae (Col., Hydrophilidae). Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 88: 105–168.Google Scholar

d'Orchymont, A. 1926. Contribution à l'étude des Hydrophilides. V. Bull. Annls Soc. ent. Belg. 66: 91–106.Google Scholar

d'Orchymont, A. 1927. Über zwei neue diluviale Helophoren-Arten. Jber. Abh. Naturw. Ges. Isis, Dresden 1926: 100–104.Google Scholar

d'Orchymont, A. 1938. Contribution à l'étude des Palpicomia. XII. Bull. Annls Soc. ent. Belg. 78: 426–438.Google Scholar

d'Orchymont, A. 1942 a. Révision des Laccobius américains (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Hydrobiini). Bull. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 18: 1–18.Google Scholar

d'Orchymont, A. 1942 b. Contribution à l'étude de la tribu Hydrobiinae Bedel, specialement de sa sous-tribu Hydrobiae (Palpicomia, Hydrophilidae). Mem. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 24: 1–68.Google Scholar

d'Orchymont, A. 1945. Notes sur des Helophorus, spécialement américains (Coleoptera Palpicomia Hydrophilidae). Bull. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 21: 1–28.Google Scholar

d'Orchymont, A. 1946. Notes on some American Berosus (s. str.) (Coleoptera, Palpicomia, Hydrophilidae). Bull. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 22: 1–20.Google Scholar

Palisot de Beauvois, A.M.F.J. 1805–1821. Insectes recueillis en Afrique et en Amérique…. Paris. 276 pp., 90 col. pl.Google Scholar

Paykull, G. 1798. Fauna Suecica, Insecta. Vol. I. Upsaliae, 8 + 358 + 2 pp.Google Scholar

Pennak, R.W. 1978. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States. 2nd ed.John Wiley & Sons, 803 pp.Google Scholar

Perkins, P.D., and Spangler, P.J.. 1981. A description of the larvae of Helocombus bifidus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 57: 52–56.Google Scholar

Poppius, B. 1907. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Coleopteren-Fauna des Lena-Thales in Ost-Sibirien. I.I. Gyrinidae, Hydrophilidae, etc. Ofvers, finska VetenskSoc. Forh. 49: 1–17.Google Scholar

Preyssler, J.D.E. 1790. Verzeichniss bohmischer Insecten. Erstes Hundert. Prag. 108 pp., 2 pl.Google Scholar

Provancher, L. 1877. Petite Faune Entomologique du Canada précédée d'un Traité élémentaire d'Entomologie. Vol. I. Les Coléoptères. Québec. VIII + 785 pp.Google Scholar

Quennedey, A. 1965. Contribution à la connaisance de quelques types larvaires de Sphaeridiinae (Col., Hydrophilidae). Trav. Lab. Zool. Stn aquic. Grimaldi Dijon 66: 1–56.Google Scholar

Randall, S.W. 1838 a. Descriptions of new species of coleopterous insects inhabiting the state of Maine. Boston J. nat. Hist. 2: 1–33.Google Scholar

Randall, S.W. 1838 b. Descriptions of new species of coleopterous insects inhabiting the state of Massachusetts. Boston J. nat. Hist. 2: 34–52.Google Scholar

Rey, C. 1885. Histoire naturelle des Coléoptères de France. Palpicomes (2nd ed.). Annls Soc. linn. Lyon (N.S.) 31: 213–396.Google Scholar

Richmond, E.A. 1920. Studies on the biology of the aquatic Hydrophilidae. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 42: 1–94, pl. I–XVI.Google Scholar

Sahlberg, J. 1880. Bidrag till nordvestra Sibiriens Insektfauna. Coleoptera I. Cicindelidae – Micropeplidae. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Årsb. 17: 1–115.Google Scholar

Say, T. 1823. Descriptions of coleopterous insects collected in the late expedition to the Rocky Mountains, performed by order of Mr. Calhoun, Secretary of War, under the command of Major Long. Jl Acad. nat. Hist. Philad. 3: 139–216.Google Scholar

Say, T. 1824. Appendix to the narrative of an expedition to the source of St. Peter's River…., under the command of Major S.H. Long, U.S.T.E. Western Quarterly Reporter 2: 268–378.Google Scholar

Say, T. 1825. Descriptions of new species of coleopterous insects inhabiting the United States. Jl Acad. nat. Hist. Philad. 5: 160–204.Google Scholar

Say, T. 1835. Descriptions of new North American coleopterous insects, and observations on some already described. Boston J. nat. Hist. 1: 151–203.Google Scholar

Seidlitz, G.C.M. 1887–1891. Fauna Baltica. Die Käfer (Coleoptera) der Ostseeprovinzen Russlands. Ed. 2. Königsberg. 10 + LVI + 192 + 818 pp.Google Scholar

Semenov, A. 1900. On a new genus of the family Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) and a contribution to a study of parallel morphology. Horae Soc. ent. rossicae 34: 614–630.Google Scholar

Sharp, D. 1882–1887. Aquatic beetles and Staphylinidae. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Coleoptera 1, 2. London. 824 pp., 19 pl.Google Scholar

Sharp, D. 1883. Revision of the species included in the genus Tropisternus (fam. Hydrophilidae). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond.: 91–117.Google Scholar

Sharp, D. 1915. Studies in Helophorini 1–8. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 51: 2–5, 27–30, 113–118, 130–138, 156–163, 198–204, 233–238, 270–277.Google Scholar

Smetana, A. 1971. Revision of the tribe Quediini of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 79. VI + 303 pp.Google Scholar

Smetana, A. 1974. Revision o the genus Cymbiodyta Bed. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 93. IV + 113 pp.Google Scholar

Smetana, A. 1978. Revision of the subfamily Sphaeridiinae of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 105. 292 pp.Google Scholar

Smetana, A. 1980. Revision of the genus Hydrochara Berth. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 111. 100 pp.Google Scholar

Smetana, A. 1984. Revision of the subfamily Sphaeridiinae of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Hydrophili dae). Supplementum 2. Can. Ent. 116: 555–566.Google Scholar

Smetana, A. 1985 a. Revision of the subfamily Helophorinae of the Nearctic region (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 131. 154 pp.Google Scholar

Smetana, A. 1985 b. Synonymical notes on Hydrophilidae. Coleopts Bull. 39: 328Google Scholar

Smetana, A. 1987. Replacement name for Helophorus frater Smetana 1985 (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 41: 262.Google Scholar

Solier, A.J.J. 1834. Observations sur la tribu des Hydrophiliens, et principalement sur le genre Hydrophilus de Fabricius. Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 3: 299–318.Google Scholar

Spangler, P.J. 1961. Notes on the biology and distribution of Sperchopsis tessellatus (Ziegler) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 15: 105–112.Google Scholar

Spangler, P.J. 1962. Description of the larva and pupa of Ametor scabrosus (Horn) (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Coleopts Bull. 16: 15–19.Google Scholar

Spangler, P.J. 1966. A new cryptic species of Cymbiodyta from the midwestern U.S. (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Ent. News 77: 211–216.Google Scholar

Stace Smith, G. 1930. Coleoptera of Copper Mt., B.C. Part II. Mus. and Art Notes 5: 22–25.Google Scholar

Stephens, J.F. 1833. The nomenclature of British insects…. 2nd ed. London. 136 pp.Google Scholar

Sturm, J. 1807. Deutschlands Fauna….V. Abtheilung. Die Insecten. Vol. 2. Nürnberg, 4 + 279 pp., pl 21–52.Google Scholar

Summers, S.V. 1874. Catalogue of the Coleoptera from the region of Lake Pontchartrain, La. Bull. Buffalo Soc. nat. Sci. 2: 78–99.Google Scholar

Thomson, C.G. 1853. Oefversigt af de i Sverige funna arter of Familien Palpicomia. Öfvers. K. VetenskAcad. Förh. 10: 40–58.Google Scholar

Thomson, C.G. 1859, 1867. Skandinaviens Coleoptera. Vol. I, Vol. IX. Lund, Vol. I, 304 pp.; Vol. IX, 407 pp.Google Scholar

Van Tassel, Eileen R. 1966. Taxonomy and biology of the subfamily Berosinae of North and Central America and the West Indies. The Catholic Univ. of America. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.Google Scholar

Walker, F. 1866. Descriptions of Coleoptera. In Lord, (Ed.), The Naturalist in Vancouver and British Columbia. Vol. 2. London.Google Scholar

Wickham, H.F. 1895. The Coleoptera of Canada. X.I. The Hydrophilidae of Ontario and Quebec. Can. Ent 27:181–186, 213–216.Google Scholar

Wilson, C.B. 1923. Life history of the scavenger water beetle Hydrous (Hydrophilus) triangularis, and its economic relation to fish breeding. Bull. Bureau Fisheries 39: 9–38.Google Scholar

Winters, F.C. 1926. Notes on the Hydrobiini (Coleoptera – Hydrophilidae) of Boreal America. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 3: 49–58.Google Scholar

Winters, F.C. 1927. Key to the subtribe Helocharae Orchym. (Coleoptera-Hydrophilidae) of Boreal America. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 4: 19–29.Google Scholar

Winters, F.C. 1944. Sphaeridini inhabiting Boreal America. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 39: 94–95.Google Scholar

Wood, D.M., Dang, P.T., and Ellis, R.A.. 1979. The Insects and Arachnids of Canada. Part 6. The mosquitoes of Canada. Diptera: Culicidae. Agric. Can. Publ. 1686. 390 pp.Google Scholar

Wooldridge, D.P. 1965. A preliminary check-list of the aquatic Hydrophilidae of Illinois. Trans. Ill. St. Acad. Sci. 58: 205–206.Google Scholar

Wooldridge, D.P. 1966. Notes on Nearctic Paracymus with descriptions of new species (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 39: 712–725.Google Scholar

Wooldridge, D.P. 1967. The aquatic Hydrophilidae of Illinois. Trans. Ill. St. Acad. Sci. 60: 422–431.Google Scholar

Young, F.N. 1954. The water beetles of Florida. Univ. Fla. Publ. biol. Sci. Ser. 5 (1): 1–238.Google Scholar

Zaitsev, F.A. 1908. Catalogue des Coléoptères aquatiques des familles des Dryopidae, Georyssidae, Cyathoceridae, Heteroceridae et Hydrophilidae. Horae Soc. ent. rossicae 38: 283–420.Google Scholar

Ziegler, D. 1844. Descriptions of new North American Coleoptera. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 2: 43–417.Google Scholar

Zimmermann, C. 1869. Synonymical notes on Coleoptera of the United States, with descriptions of new species, from the MSS. of the late Dr. C. Zimmermann. Edited by John L. LeConte, M.D. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 2: 243–259.Google Scholar