Detecting Impact Damages in an Aramid/Glass Fiber Reinforced Hybrid Composite with Micro Tomography

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper utilizes the micro computerized tomography (micro-CT) as the NDI technique to characterize the initial matrix delaminations locations and sizes in an aramid/glass fiber reinforced hybrid composite test specimen after a low velocity impact tests. Further, to visualize the localized low velocity impact damage volumes; based on the specimens micro-CT results; image analysis, geometric modeling and meshing softwares CtAn and CtVox were used. Finally, interpretation of damage mechanisms occurred in aramid/glass fiber reinforced hybrid composite after low velocity impact loading presented with accurate 3-D rendered models obtained from a series of micro-CT slices. 3-D rendered models gained from impacted specimens help to quantify the internal microscopic damage modes of complex material system such as aramid/glass fiber reinforced hybrid composite. It is very important to predict or determine composite materials response to an impact loading since impacts occur during manufacture, normal operations, maintenance, etc. After low velocity impact loading tests, investigation of damage zone will provide a better composite manufacturing process. For example, it is acknowledged that up to 80% of the cost of manufacture of a composite is xed once the preliminary conguration had been nalised. Further detail changes afterwards can only make a small impact on the nal cost of the manufacturing process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

9-14

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

[1] Mouritz AP, Gallagher J, Goodwin AA. Flexural strength and interlaminar shear strength of stiched GRP laminates following repeated impacts. Composite Science Technology 1997; 57: 509–22.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(96)00164-9

Google Scholar

[2] Lopresto V, Scarponi C, Briotti G. Influence of material thickness on the response of carbon fabric/epoxy panels to low velocity impact. Composite Science Technology 1999; 59: 2279–86.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(99)00079-2

Google Scholar

[3] Davies GA, Hitchings D, Zhou G. Impact damage and residual strength of woven fabric glass/polyester laminates. Composites 1996; 27A: 1147–56.

DOI: 10.1016/1359-835x(96)00083-8

Google Scholar

[4] Hawyes VJ, Curtis PT, Sout C. Effect of impact damage on the compressive response of composite laminates. Composites A 2001; 32: 1263–70.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-835x(01)00072-0

Google Scholar

[5] Hirai Y, Hamada H, Kim JK. Impact response of glass woven fabric composites – I. Effect of fibre surface treatment. Composite Science Technology 1998; 58: 91–104.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(97)00111-5

Google Scholar

[6] Olsson R., Closed form prediction of peak load and delamination onset under small mass impact. Compsite Structructures 2003; 59: 341–9.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8223(02)00244-1

Google Scholar

[7] Hou JP, Petrinic N, Ruiz C, Hallett SR. Prediction of impact damage in composite plates. Composite Science Technology 2000; 60: 273–81.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(99)00126-8

Google Scholar

[8] Hancox NL. An overview of the impact behavior of fibrereinforced composites. In: Reid SR, Zhou G, editors. Impact behaviour of fibre-reinforced composite materials and structures. Oxford: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2000. p.1–32.

DOI: 10.1533/9781855738904.1

Google Scholar

[9] Müller R., The Zürich experience: one decade of three dimensional high-resolution computed tomography. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 13(5): 307–22.

DOI: 10.1097/00002142-200210000-00003

Google Scholar

[10] Ramaswamy S, Gupta M, Goel A, Aaltosalmi U, Kataja M, Koponen A, et al. The 3D structure of fabric and its relationship to liquid and vapor transport. Colloid Surface A 2004; 241(1–3): 323–33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.04.023

Google Scholar

[11] Goel A, Tzanakakis M, Huang S, Ramaswamy S, Choi D, Ramarao B. Characterization of three-dimensional structure of paper using Xray microtomography. Tappi J 84(5).

Google Scholar

[12] Thibault X, Bloch J-F. Structural analysis by X-ray microtomography of a strained nonwoven papermaker felt. Textile Res J 2002; 72(6): 480–5.

DOI: 10.1177/004051750207200603

Google Scholar

[13] Desplentere F, Lomov SV, Woerdeman DL, Verpoest I, Wevers M. Geometrical characterization of 3D warp-interlaced fabrics. SAMPEUSA, (2003).

Google Scholar

[14] Delerue J-F, Verpoest I, Wevers M, Lomov SV, Parnas RS. Pore network modelling of permeability for textile reinforcements. Polym composite 2003; 24(3): 344–57.

DOI: 10.1002/pc.10034

Google Scholar

[15] Cornelis E, Kottarand A, Degischer HP. X-ray computed tomography characterising carbon fiber reinforced composites. In: 11th European conference on composite materials, Rhodes, (2004).

Google Scholar

[16] Kosek M, Vodolan J. Study of textile composite structure using CT and optical microscopy. ICCM 15, Durban South Africa, (2005).

Google Scholar