Microstructure and Properties of Weld CGHAZ under Different Heat Input for X90 Pipeline Steel

Liu Qing Yang; Yong Li Sui; Pei Pei Xia; Hai Hong Zhao; Zhang Hua Yin

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.850.943

Paper Titles

Short-Term Creep Behavior in P91 Heat-Resistant Steel at Low Stress
p.922

Water Absorption of Polyethylene Heat-Shrinkable Tape
p.927

Corrosion Failure Analysis of a New L360 Pipeline
p.930

Experimental Research and Production of Heavy Gauge DNV 485FDU for Deep Water Trunkline Project
p.937

Microstructure and Properties of Weld CGHAZ under Different Heat Input for X90 Pipeline Steel
p.943

Residual Strength Analysis of Oil Tubes with Corrosion Defect
p.950

Contrastive Study on Finite Element Models of High-Strength Pipelines Crossing Active Faults
p.957

Mechanisms of Thermo-Mechanical Process on Grain Boundary Character Distribution of 316L Austenitic Stainless Steel
p.965

Analysis of N80 Tubing Failure for CBM Well Drainage
p.971

HomeMaterials Science ForumMaterials Science Forum Vol. 850Microstructure and Properties of Weld CGHAZ under...

Microstructure and Properties of Weld CGHAZ under Different Heat Input for X90 Pipeline Steel

Abstract:

Two kinds of industry trial X90 pipeline steels which have different chemical composition were chosen as test objects, and the grain coarsening, microstructural characteristics and the variation rules of low-temperature impact toughness in weld CGHAZ of this two steel under different welding heat input were studied by physical thermal simulation technology, SEM, optical microscope and Charpy impact tests. The results showed that the microstructure in weld CGHAZ of 1# steel was mainly bainite ferrite (BF) and most of the M/A constituents were blocky or short rod-like; the grains of 2# steel were coarse and there was much granular bainite (GB). Meanwhile M/A constituents became coarser and their morphology changed from block to long bar; alloy content of X90 pipeline steel under different weld heat input had great effect on the grain size of original austenite. When heat input was lower than 20KJ/cm, the impact toughness in CGHAZ of lower alloy content pipeline steel was good; as heat input increased, impact toughness in CGHAZ of 1# steel increased to the values between 260J and 300J when heat input was between 20KJ/cm and 25KJ/cm and the dispersion of impact energy was small. The impact toughness of 2# steel decreased gradually and the impact energy had the obvious dispersion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Methods of Design and Characterization of Materials, Research and Development of Technological Processes

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 850)

Pages:

943-949

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.850.943

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2016

Authors:

Liu Qing Yang, Yong Li Sui, Pei Pei Xia, Hai Hong Zhao, Zhang Hua Yin

Keywords:

Heat Input, Microstructure, Physical Thermal Simulation, Toughness, X90 Pipeline Steel

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] X.X. Wang: Welded Pipe and Tube. 2010, 33(2), 5-12.

Google Scholar

[2] C. Pan, P. Yu, Z.L. Tian and Z.K. Xue: Transactions of the China Welding Institution. 2007, 28(11), 94-96.

Google Scholar

[3] X.L. Xu, X. X Xin, K. Shi and Y. Zhou: Transactions of the China Welding Institution. 2005, 26(8), 69-72.

Google Scholar

[4] C.L. Miao, C.J. Shang, X.M. Wang and L.F. Zhang: Acta Metallurgica Sinica. 2010, 46(5), 541-546.

Google Scholar

[5] X.L. He, C.J. Shang and S.W. Yang: High Performance Bainitic Steel. Metallurgical Industry Press, (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] G. Krauss and S.W. Thompson: ISIJ International, 35 (1995), 937.

Google Scholar

[7] C.X. Chen, W.S. Li, Q.P. Wang, B. Feng, F.M. Liu and Z.K. Xue: Transactions of the China Welding Institution. 2005, 26(6), 77-80.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Liu, L.Q. Yang, B. Feng and C.X. Xu: Materials Science Forum, 2013, Vol. 762: 556-561.

Google Scholar

[9] X.Y. Zhang, H.L. Gao and C.J. Zhuang: Transactions of the China Welding Institution. 2010, 31(3), 29-32.

Google Scholar

[10] X.Q. Zhang and Z.J. Tang: Welded Pipe and Tube. 2009, 32(11), 13-20.

Google Scholar

[11] G.Y. Qiao, Y. Han and X.L. Han: Journal of Iron and Steel Research, 2014, 26(10), 40-45.

Google Scholar