Distribution & Access For Publication Downloads News About Us Contact Us
Paper Titles
Preface, Organization and Sponsors
Flow Localization Modelling in Ti Alloys and Ti Matrix Composites
p.3
Effect of Equivalent Stress-Strain Relation and Differential Hardening on Accuracy of Forming Limit Analyses
p.9
Formability of a Magnesium Alloy AZ31B Deformed under Channel Die Compression Tests: Macroscopic Shearing of Specimens
p.15
A Comparative Study of Forming Limit Diagrams Predicted by Two Different Plasticity Theories Involving Vertex Effects
p.21
Effect of Stress State and Temperature on the Kinetics of Martensitic Phase Transformation in TRIP-Assisted Steel
p.27
Simulation and Modeling of Sintering Process for 316L Stainless Steel Metal Injection Molding Parts
p.32
Comparison of 15Cr-15Ni Austenitic Steel Cladding Tubes Obtained by HPTR Cold Pilgering or by Cold Drawing
p.38
Warm Forming and Paint Bake Response of AW-7xxx Sheet in Various Tempers
p.47

Effect of Equivalent Stress-Strain Relation and Differential Hardening on Accuracy of Forming Limit Analyses

Article Preview

Abstract:

Multiaxial tube expansion tests (MTETs) were performed to measure the multiaxial plastic deformation behavior of a cold rolled interstitial-free (IF) steel sheet for a range of strain from initial yield to fracture. The testing machine is capable of applying arbitrary principal stress or strain paths to tubular specimens using an electrical, closed-loop servo-control system for an axial force and an internal pressure. Tubular specimens with an inner diameter of 44.6 mm were fabricated from a cold rolled IF steel sheet with a thickness of 0.7 mm by roller bending and laser welding. Many linear stress paths in the first quadrant of stress space were applied to the tubular specimens to measure the forming limit strains and forming limit stresses of the as-received sheet sample, in addition to the contours of plastic work and the directions of the plastic strain rates. It was found that the shapes of the measured work contours changed with increasing plastic work. The observed differential hardening behavior was approximated by changing the material parameters and the exponent of the Yld2000-2d yield function (Barlat et al, 2003) as functions of the reference plastic strain. The hydraulic bulge tests were also conducted to measure the forming limit strain and forming limit stress for equibiaxial tension and to determine the equivalent stress-equivalent plastic strain relation for a larger strain range. The forming limit curve and forming limit stress curve were calculated using the Marciniak-Kuczyński-type approach. The calculated results were in fair agreement with the measurement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Material Forming ESAFORM 2015 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 651-653)

Pages:

9-14

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.9

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2015

Authors:

Tomoyuki Hakoyama*, Toshihiko Kuwabara

Keywords:

Biaxial Tensile Test, Forming Limit, Marciniak-Kuczyński-Type Approach, Sheet Metal Forming

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] M. Kuroda, V. Tvergaard, V., Effect of strain path change on limits to ductility of anisotropic metal sheets, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 42 (2000) 867-887.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00029-6

Google Scholar

[2] D. Banabic, F. Barlat, O. Cazacu, T. Kuwabara, Advances in anisotropy and formability, International Journal of Material Forming 3 (2010) 165-189.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-010-0992-9

Google Scholar

[3] T. Kuwabara, S. Ikeda, T. Kuroda, Measurement and Analysis of Differential Work Hardening in Cold-Rolled Steel Sheet under Biaxial Tension, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 80-81 (1998) 517-523.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(98)00155-1

Google Scholar

[4] T. Kuwabara, A. Van Bael and E. Iizuka, Measurement and analysis of yield locus and work hardening characteristics of steel sheets wtih different r-values, Acta Materialia 50 (2002) 3717- 3729.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00184-2

Google Scholar

[5] T. Kuwabara, K. Hashimoto, E. Iizuka, J. -W. Yoon, Effect of anisotropic yield functions on the accuracy of hole expansion simulations, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 211 (2011) 475-481.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.10.025

Google Scholar

[6] D. Yanaga, T. Kuwabara, N. Uema, M. Asano, Material modeling of 6000 series aluminum alloy sheets with different density cube textures and effect on the accuracy of finite element simulation, International Journal of Solids and Structures 49 (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.005

Google Scholar

[7] D. Yanaga, H. Takizawa, T. Kuwabara, Formulation of Differential Work Hardening of 6000 Series Aluminum Alloy Sheet and Application to Finite Element Analysis, Journal of Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity 55 (2014) 55-61. (in Japanese).

DOI: 10.9773/sosei.55.55

Google Scholar

[8] ISO 16842: 2014 - Metallic materials - Sheet and strip - Biaxial tensile testing method using a cruciform test piece.

DOI: 10.3403/30430367

Google Scholar

[9] M. Ishiki, T. Kuwabara, Y. Hayashida, Measurement and analysis of differential work hardening behavior of pure titanium sheet using spline function, International Journal of Material Forming 4 (2011) 193-204.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-010-1024-5

Google Scholar

[10] T. Kuwabara, K. Yoshida, K. Narihara, S. Takahashi, Anisotropic plastic deformation of extruded aluminum alloy tube under axial forces and internal pressure, International Journal of Plasticity 21 (2005) 101-117.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.04.006

Google Scholar

[11] T. Kuwabara, F. Sugawara, Multiaxial tube expansion test method for measurement of sheet metal deformation behavior under biaxial tension for a large strain range, International Journal of Plasticity 45 (2013) 103-118.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.12.003

Google Scholar

[12] F. Barlat, J.C. Brem, J.W. Yoon, K Chung, R.E. Dick, D.J. Lege, F. Pourboghrat, S.H. Choi, E. Chu, Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets - Part 1: Theory, International Journal of Plasticity 19 (2003) 1297-1319.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(02)00019-0

Google Scholar

[13] Z. Marciniak, K. Kuczyński, Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 9 (1967) 609–620.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(67)90066-5

Google Scholar

[14] R. Hill, S.S. Hecker, M.G. Stout, An investigation of plastic flow and differential work hardening in orthotropic brass tubes under fluid pressure and axial load, International Journal of Solids and Structures 31 (1994) 2999-3021.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(94)90065-5

Google Scholar

[15] K. Yoshida, T. Kuwabara, K. Narihara and S. Takahashi, Experimental Verification of the Path Independence of Forming Limit Stresses , International Journal of Forming Processes 8 (2005) 283-298.

Google Scholar

[16] T. Hakoyama and T. Kuwabara, Forming Limit Analyses of 590 MPa High Strength Steel Sheet Using Differential Work Hardening Model, Key Engineering Materials 622-623 (2014) 353-358.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.622-623.353

Google Scholar

[17] K. Yoshida, T. Kuwabara and M. Kuroda, Path-dependence of the forming limit stresses in a sheet metal, International Journal of Plasticity 23 (2007) 361-384.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2006.05.005

Google Scholar

Scientific.Net is a registered brand of Trans Tech Publications Ltd
© 2024 by Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved