Effect of Carrier Gas Flow Rate in Thermal Desorption Process of PCBs Contaminated Soil

Article Preview

Abstract:

A real PCBs contaminated soil was heated at 500°C using pure nitrogen as carrier gas under different flow rate to investigate the influence of carrier gas flow rate on the thermal desorption process. After 1 hour thermal treatment, the residual PCBs in soil decreased and the removal efficiency (RE) of PCBs is up to 95.1%. The distributions of PCBs in soil under different flow rate were identical. The World Health Organization toxic equivalency quantity (WHO TEQ) of PCBs in soil got its lowest value at 400Nml/min. Tetra-and higher chlorinated PCBs desorbed to carrier gas increased with increased flow rate, while the total amount of PCBs, Tri-and lower chlorinated PCBs first increased then decreased. The distributions of PCBs in carrier gas became more closely to the raw soil with increased flow rate. The TEQ of PCBs in carrier gas increased with increased flow rate. Increased flow rate enhanced the mass transfer of PCBs in the soil but shortened the preheating time of carrier gas and the retention time of carries gas, weakening the mass transfer and degradation process in gas phase. The RE of WHO TEQ of PCDDs in treated soil decreased from 86.7% to 83.2% with increased flow rate while the RE of WHO TEQ of PCDFs decreased from 85.4% to 70.0%. After thermal treatment process, the total amount of PCDD/Fs TEQ in soil and carrier gas increase from 43.8% to 18.6% times of that in raw soil. Considering removal efficiency of PCBs and PCDD/Fs and generation of PCDD/Fs in soil and gas phase, an optimized flow rate should be set at about 400Nml/min.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

731-738

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

[1] X.H. Bi, S.G. Chu, X.B. Xu, Research of the adsorption behavior of PCBs in the environment, Environmental Science. 21 (2001) 454-458. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] M.X. Que, The distribution and source apportionment of PCBs contaminated in soil, Harbin Engineering University, 2007. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] J. Liu, Z.J. Cui, X.J. Song, S.F. Chen, F. Lu, N. Xu, Influences of soil characteristics on the PCBs distribution soil of the modern Yellow River delta, Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 19 (2010) 86-91. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Izadifard, G. Achari, C.H. Langford, The pathway of dechlorination of PCB congener by a photochemical chain process in 2-propanol: The role of medium and quenching, Chemosphere. 73 (2008) 1328-1334.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.07.003

Google Scholar

[5] P. Varanasi, A. Fullana, S. Sidhu. Remediation of PCB contaminated soils using iron nano-particles, Chemosphere. 66 (2007) 1031-1038.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.036

Google Scholar

[6] Application guide for thermal desorption systems [R], Naval facilities engineering service center, 1998, pp.3-16.

Google Scholar

[7] Z.W. Kang, S.H. Shu, Z. Zhang. Progress of Chemical Treatment of PCBs. Guangxi Journal of Light Industry, 140 (2010) 23-24. (in CHinese).

Google Scholar

[8] H.S. Ana, S.S. Parka, K.H. Kima, S.U. Parka, T.I. Ohmb, Treatment of PCB-contaminated pole transformers by vacuum thermal recycling with voltage adjuster, Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 89 (2011) 268–274.

DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2011.04.004

Google Scholar

[9] F. Kastaneka, P. Kastanekb, Combined decontamination processes for wastes containing PCBs, Journal of Hazardous Materials. B117 (2005) 185–205.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.09.026

Google Scholar

[10] V. Risoul, V. Renauld, G. Trouvé, P. Gilot, A laboratory pilot study of thermal decontamination of soils polluted by PCBs. Comparison with thermogravimetric analysis, Waste Management. 22 (2002) 61-72.

DOI: 10.1016/s0956-053x(01)00051-4

Google Scholar

[11] M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto, C. Fragale, P. Giannoccaro, C. Pastore, D. Zammiello, C. Ferraqina, Thermal desorption of polychlorobiphenyls from contaminated soils and their hydrodechlorination using Pd- and Rh-supported catalysts, Chemosphere. 70 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.07.074

Google Scholar

[12] T. Sato, T. Todoroki, K. Shimoda, et al, Behavior of PCDDs/PCDFs in remediation of PCBs-contaminated sediments by thermal desorption, Chemosphere. 80. (2010) 184-189.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.02.055

Google Scholar

[13] R. Weber, Relevance of PCDD/PCDF formation for the evaluation of POPs destruction technologies-Review on current status and assessment gaps, Chemosphere. 67 (2007) 109-117.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.094

Google Scholar

[14] L. Zhao, H. Hou, K. Shimoda, A. Terada, M. Hosomi, Formation pathways of polychlorinated dibenzofurans (PCDFs) in sediments contaminated with PCBs during the thermal desorption process, Chemosphere. 88 (2012) 1368-1374.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.042

Google Scholar

[15] More information on http: /edis. ifas. ufl. edu/pdffiles/SS/SS16900. pdf.

Google Scholar

[16] T. Chen , X.D. Li , J.H. Yan , Y.Q. Jin, Polychlorinated biphenyls emission from a medical waste incinerator in China, Journal of Hazardous Materials. 172 (2009) 1339-1343.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.147

Google Scholar

[17] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Method 1613 Tetra- through Octa-Chlorinated Dioxins and Furans by Isotope Dilution HRGC/HRMS, October (1994).

DOI: 10.3403/03053304

Google Scholar

[18] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Method 1668B Chlorinated Biphenyl Congeners in Water, Soil, Sediment, Biosolids, and Tissue by HRGC/HRMS, November (2008).

Google Scholar

[19] M. Van den Berg, L.S. Birnbaum, M. Denison, M. Vito De, W. Farland, M. Feeley, H. Fiedler, H. Hakansson, A. Hanberg, L. Haws, M. Rose, S. Safe, D. Schrenk, C. Tohyama, A. Tritscher, J. Tuomisto, M. Tysklind, N. Walker, R.E. Peterson , The 2005 World Health Organization Re-evaluation of Human and Mammalian Toxic Equivalency Factors for Dioxins and Dioxin-like Compounds, Toxic Technological. 93 (2006).

DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl055

Google Scholar

[20] G.M. Frame, J.W. Cochran, S.S. Bowadt, Complete PCB Congener Distributions for 17 Aroclor Mixtures Determined by 3 HRGC Systems Optimized for Comprehensive, Quantitative, Congener-Specific Analysis, Journal of High Resolution Chromatogr. 19 (1996).

DOI: 10.1002/jhrc.1240191202

Google Scholar

[21] F. Murena, E. Schioppa, Kinetic analysis of catalytic hydrodechlorination process of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Applied Catalysis B: Environmental. 27 (2000) 257–267.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-3373(00)00157-0

Google Scholar