Design of a Novel Excitation Circuit for Low Perming Error Fluxgate

Article Preview

Abstract:

An effective method for low perming error of fluxgates is to enlarge the peak value of the excitation current, but large amplitude excitation will increase the power consumption. A narrow pulse excitation current with sufficient peak value can reduce perming error with low power consumption while increase the difficulty of the signal processing with low sensitivity. The perfected excitation waveform with high ratio of peak value to RMS value by careful excitation tuning is an efficient solution. This paper presents a novel circuit which can generate an excitation current waveform with high peak value and low RMS value for fluxgates. Different from the tuned excitation circuit, the proposed circuit is a combination of an integrator and a differentiator with the same squarewave input. The excitation signal is the sum of a triangle wave and a sharp narrow pulse signal. It is easy to adjust the peak value of the narrow pulses for perming error study and no careful tune adjusting is needed. Finally, in case of the fixed peak value of the narrow pulses, an improved excitation circuit with only two resistors, two capacitors and one amplifier is also presented in the paper. The experiment results show that 0.5nT perming error can be achieved for 10mT shock.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

859-863

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

[1] Pavel. Ripka, Fluxgate: Tuned vs. Untuned Output, IEEE Transactions on magnetics, vol. 34, pp.1303-1305, (1998).

DOI: 10.1109/20.706529

Google Scholar

[2] P. Ripka, Race-track fluxgate with adjustable feedthrough, Sens. Actuators. A 85 (2000), pp.227-231.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(00)00394-0

Google Scholar

[3] P. Ripka, Review of fluxgate sensors, Sens. Actuators. A 33 (1992), pp.129-141.

Google Scholar

[4] C. Hinnrichs, C. Pels, M. Schilling, Noise and linearity of a fluxgate magnetometer in racetrack geometry, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 87, pp.7085-7807, (2000).

DOI: 10.1063/1.372939

Google Scholar

[5] P. Ripka, W.G. Hurley, Switching-modefluxgate, in: Proceedings of the Transducers Conference, Boston, 2003, p.1283–1286.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Tipek, T. O'Donnel, P. Ripka, and J. Kubik, Excitation of PCB fluxgate sensor, IEEE sensors, vol. 1, pp.647-650, (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/icsens.2003.1279017

Google Scholar

[7] Jan Kubik, Pavel Ripka, Noise spectrum of pulse excited fluxgate sensor, Sens. Actuators. A 132 (2006), pp.236-240.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.02.004

Google Scholar

[8] R. Ja. Berkman, B.L. Bondaruk, Feroresonansnyj rezhim vozbuzhdenia magni nych modulatorov i ferozondov (Ferroresonance mode of excitation of magnetic modulators and fluxgate sensors), Geofiziczeskaya apparatura, vol. 50, pp.20-28, (1972).

Google Scholar

[9] P. Ripka W.G. Hurley, Excitation efficiency of fluxgate sensors, Sensors and Actuators A 129 (2006), pp.75-79.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2005.09.047

Google Scholar

[10] P. Ripka, W. G. Hurley, Excitation tuning in fluxgate Sensors, Proc. IMTC conf. pp.677-680, (2002).

Google Scholar

[11] H. Ni, Z. Xu, et al., Research of the low power consumption fluxgate magnetometer, Journal of TONGJI University, vol. 25 (3) , pp.306-310, (1997).

Google Scholar

[12] S. Liu, Study on the low power consumption of racetrack fluxgate, Sens. Actuators A 130-131 (2006), pp.124-128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2005.12.004

Google Scholar