An Assembly Simulation Optimization Method Based on View Transformation

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to improve showing effect of the aircraft assembly simulation, a new assembly process simulation optimization method was proposed with combining evaluation of viewpoints with view transformation. First, viewpoints evaluation principle was put forward according to assembly simulation features; then a new view coordinate system was calculated based on the view coordinate system transformation matrix by integrating the direction of assembly paths with the viewpoints evaluation principle; finally, entire optimized process of assembly simulation was analyzed. Efficiency of this method was verified by comparing the result of the optimized wing box assembly simulation with the one which had not been optimized.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

455-459

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

[1] Hao Xu, Pu Wan, An improved genetic algorithm for solving simulation optimization problems, International Journal of the Physical Sciences 6 (10). 2399-2404(2011).

Google Scholar

[2] Christiand, Jungwon Yoon, Optimal assembly path planning algorithm for aircraft part maintenance, in: International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2007), 2190-2194(2007).

DOI: 10.1109/iccas.2007.4406696

Google Scholar

[3] LIU Jian-hua, NING Ru-xin, WAN Bi-le, XIONG Zhen-qi, Research of complex product assembly path planning in virtual assembly, Journal of System Simulation 19 (9) 2003-2007(2007).

Google Scholar

[4] de Faz io T L . A Prototype of Feature-based Design for Assembly. ASMEJ. of Mech . Design, 29( 8): 575-584(1993).

Google Scholar

[5] Jayaramn S, et al. VADE: a virtual assembly desingn environment. IEEE Computer Grpahics and Applications, 19(6): 44−50 (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] Chryssolouris G, Mavrikios D, Fragos DA. Virtual reality based experimentation environment for the verification of human-related factor in assembly processes. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 16: 267−276 (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0736-5845(00)00013-2

Google Scholar

[7] Weinshall D, Werman M. On View Likelihood and Stability. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19(2): 97-108(1997).

DOI: 10.1109/34.574783

Google Scholar

[8] Hartmann J, Meeker C, Weiier M, et al. Determinate assembly of tooling allows concurrent design of Airbus wings and major assembly fixtures. SAE Paper 2004-01-2832 (2004).

DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-2832

Google Scholar