Synthesizing Different Preference Information by Fuzzy Programming Method

Jing Yang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.328-330.2352

Paper Titles

Study on Integrated Setup System with Computer Vision for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy
p.2333

ONAMA: A Quantum Leap in High Performance Computing
p.2337

Optimization of Comprehensive Assessment Parameters System for Equipment Maintenance Quality Based on Principal Component Analysis
p.2343

Developing Mechanical-Electrical-Hydraulic Integrated Equipment Based on Application Ability Training
p.2348

Synthesizing Different Preference Information by Fuzzy Programming Method
p.2352

Evaluation and Analysis on Benefit of College Resources Input of China
p.2358

System Evaluation of Construction Operations in View of Ergonomics
p.2362

Simulation of the Main Engine Remote Control System for Marine Education and Training
p.2367

An Approach to Reconstructing 3D Solid Model and Generating Orthographic Views from the Two 2D Views Using AutoCAD
p.2372

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 328-330Synthesizing Different Preference Information by...

Synthesizing Different Preference Information by Fuzzy Programming Method

Abstract:

Group decision making problems with different forms of preference information are discussed. Firstly, four forms of preference information ( i.e. preference ordering, utility value, AHP judgment matrix and fuzzy judgment matrix) are introduced and the computing formulas are given to transform different forms of preference information into the form of fuzzy judgment matrix. A new method that involves in different preference strength of experts is studied. Then, the assessment of the group priorities is formulated as a fuzzy linear programming problem, maximizing the group’s overall satisfaction to get the group solution. The method can easily deal with missing judgments and different partiality intensity by decision makers. At the end, the feasibility and effectiveness of method is explained by an example.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 328-330)

Pages:

2352-2357

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.328-330.2352

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2011

Authors:

Jing Yang

Keywords:

Alternative Selection, Fuzzy Linear Programming, Group Decision Making, Information Synthesis

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

References

[1] Tanino T. Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and System , Vol. 12(1984), p.117~131.

DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0

Google Scholar

[2] Switalski Z. Transitivity of fuzzy p reference relations - an empirical study [J]. Fuzzy Sets and System , Vol. 118(2001), p.503~508.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(98)00287-5

Google Scholar

[3] Xu Zeshui, Wei Cuiping. A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process[J ] . European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 116(1999), pp.443-449.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00109-x

Google Scholar

[4] Finan J S , Hurley WJ . The analytic hierarchy process: does adjusting a pairwise comparison matrix to improve the consistency ratio help [J]. Computers Ops Res, Vol. 24(1997) No. 8, pp.749-755.

DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(96)00090-1

Google Scholar

[5] Pelaez J I , Lamata M T. A new measure of consistency for positive reciprocal matrices[J ] . Computers and Mathematics With Applications , Vol. 46 (2003), pp.1840-1845.

DOI: 10.1016/s0898-1221(03)90240-9

Google Scholar

[6] Bodily S E. A delegation process for combining individual utility function[J ]. Management Science , Vol. 25(1979) No. 10, pp.209-231.

Google Scholar

[7] Brock H W. The problem of utility weights in group preference aggregation [J]. Operations Research, Vol. 28(1980) No. 1, p.176–187.

DOI: 10.1287/opre.28.1.176

Google Scholar

[8] Krzyszto fowica R , Duck stein L. Preference criterion for flood control under uncertainty [J] . Water Resources Research , Vol. 15(1979)No. 3, p.513 – 520.

DOI: 10.1029/wr015i003p00513

Google Scholar

[9] XIAO Si han; FAN Zhi ping; WANG Meng guang. Integrated Approach to Two Judgement Matrices in Group Decision Making[J]. Control and Decision, Vol. 16(2001)No. 5, pp.569-572.

Google Scholar

[10] XU Ze-shui; LIU Hai-feng. On Compatibility of Six Kinds of Uncertain Judgement Matrices[J]. Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics, Vol. 17(2003), No. 2, pp.53-58.

Google Scholar

[11] WU Jiang; HUANG Deng shi. The Uniform Methods for Interval Number Preference Informationin Multi-Attribute Decision Making[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory Methodology Application, Vol. 12(2003)No. 4, pp.359-362.

Google Scholar