Summary of the Desulfurization Solutions of Marine Exhaust Gas

Article Preview

Abstract:

SOX emission control of the marine exhaust gas can be achieved by post-processing desulfurization and LNG’s usage. The two solutions are discussed by the technical and economic analysis. Four kinds of post-processing desulfurization have the differences on system composition, wastewater discharge, and applicable waters, absorbents and so on. The pay-off periods of post-processing desulfurization are ranged from 0.5 to 2.2 years, which depended on the ship type’s difference. LNG’s pay-off periods is about one year, but some hidden costs for LNG ship’s promotion are difficult to estimate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1010-1012)

Pages:

588-594

Citation:

Online since:

August 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Huang J, Li P, Chen J, Environmental Protection In Transportation, Vol. 20(1999): pp.20-24(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] IMO, in: International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution From Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978, edited by China communication press, China, Beijing(1998): in press.

Google Scholar

[3] MEPC, in: Amendments to the annex of the protocol of 1997 to amend the international convention for the Prevention of Pollution From Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978 relating thereto, edited by IMO, London, Great British(2008).

Google Scholar

[4] Ling-yu Yao, Li Zhang, Li-hua Dong, Science &Technology Information, Vol. 11(2012): pp.196-197(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Jie Zhang, Chuanfu Yang, Jun Yu, Diesel Engine, Vol. 29(2007): pp.1-6(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] HY Luo, JB Liu, Marine Technology, 2007(1): pp.34-37(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Kevin J. Reynolds, Sean A. Caughlan, Richard S. Strong, The Glosten Associates, Vol. 1(2011): pp.33-34.

Google Scholar

[8] Lloyd's Register, in: Understanding exhaust gas treatment systems-Guidance for ship-owners and operators, edited by Shipping emissions abatement and trading, London, Great British(2012): in press.

Google Scholar

[9] Information on http: /www. acoa-apeca. gc. ca.

Google Scholar

[10] Alistair Ritchie, Emily de Jonge , Christoph Hugi , etc. al, Abatement and Market-based Instruments, Vol. 8(2005): pp.16-17.

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http: /www. setcorp. info.

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http: /www. hamworthy. com.

Google Scholar

[13] Information on http: /www. wartsila. com.

Google Scholar

[14] Information on http: / www. alfalaval. com.

Google Scholar

[15] Information on http: /cleanmarine. no.

Google Scholar

[16] Information on http: /www. setcorp. ru.

Google Scholar

[17] MPEC, in: 2009 Guidelines for Exhaust Gas Cleaning Systems, edited by IMO, London, Great British (2009): in press.

Google Scholar

[18] M E Davies, G Plant, C Cosslett, et. al., in: Study on the Economic, Legal, Environmental and Practical Implications of a European Union System to Reduce Ship Emission SO2 and NOX, edited by EU Ship Emissions to Air, London, England(2000).

Google Scholar

[19] Information on http: /www. cngold. org.

Google Scholar

[20] Mads Lyder Andersen, Niels B. Clausen, Pierre C. Sames, in: Costs and benefits of LNG as ship fuel for container vessels, edited by Germanischer Lloyd, Hamburg, Germany (2011), in press.

Google Scholar

[21] Information on www. eworldship. com.

Google Scholar

[22] Information on http: /www. chinastock. com. cn.

Google Scholar

[23] Guangde Xiong, Yunlong Mao, Natural Gas and Oil, Vol. 23(2005, ): pp.17-21(in Chinese).

Google Scholar