Experimental Study on a Combined Process of Anaerobic Filter, Anoxic, Oxic and Constructed Wetland for Rural Domestic Sewage Treatment

John Leju Celestino Ladu; Xi Wu Lu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1004-1005.1033

Paper Titles

A Green Approach for Highly Reduction of Graphene Oxide by Supercritical Fluid
p.1013

Synthesis of a Novel Halogen-Free Intumescent Flame Retardant Agent
p.1017

Synthesis, Application of a Novel Halogen-Free Intumescent Flame Retardant Agent for Poplar Wood Veneer
p.1022

Comparation of Calix[6]arene and its Phosphorus Derivative for Complexation of Na⁺, Cu²⁺, Ni²⁺, Pb²⁺, Fe³⁺, Cr³⁺ and ²⁺ UO₂²⁺Ions
p.1026

Experimental Study on a Combined Process of Anaerobic Filter, Anoxic, Oxic and Constructed Wetland for Rural Domestic Sewage Treatment
p.1033

A Certain Type of Tracked Vehicle Transmission Cabinet Failure Analysis and Fatigue Life Evaluation
p.1041

Element-Free Galerkin Method of Cold Forging Steel Ball
p.1046

Experimental Study on Roundness of High-Speed Cylindrical Grinding for 20CrMnTi Alloy Steel
p.1050

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Permanent Mold Low-Pressure Casting and Sand Mold Gravity Casting of A357 Alloy
p.1055

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 1004-1005Experimental Study on a Combined Process of...

Experimental Study on a Combined Process of Anaerobic Filter, Anoxic, Oxic and Constructed Wetland for Rural Domestic Sewage Treatment

Abstract:

The right combination and sequence of treatment methods is the key to the successful handling of rural domestic sewage. This research aim was to carry out experimental study on the combined process and assess its efficiency, feasibility, robustness and suitability for rural domestic sewage treatment and explore the best treatment effect and operating parameters. The parameter optimized and controlled includes hydraulic retention time (HRT) and temperature during the entire research operations. The average COD, TN, NH4+-N and TP removal efficiency of the combined process was 78.2%, 70%, 76% and 87% respectively. Overall, the combined process proved to be efficient and suitable for rural domestic sewage treatment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 1004-1005)

Pages:

1033-1037

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1004-1005.1033

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2014

Authors:

John Leju Celestino Ladu*, Xi Wu Lu

Keywords:

Anaerobic, Anoxic, Combined Process, Constructed Wetland, Oxic, Rural Sewage

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] L. John Leju Celestino, L. Xiwu and O. Ahmed Mohammed. Experimental Study on Anoxic/Oxic Bioreactor and Constructed Wetland for Rural Domestic Wastewater Treatment. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol., 7(2): (2014), pp.354-363.

DOI: 10.19026/rjaset.7.262

Google Scholar

[2] L. John Leju Celestino, and L. Xiwu. Effects of hydraulic retention time, temperature, and effluent recycling on efficiency of anaerobic filter in treating rural domestic wastewater. Water Science and Engineering, 7(2): (2014), pp.168-182.

DOI: 10.19026/rjaset.7.403

Google Scholar

[3] P. M, Heertjes, and R. R, Van Der Meer. Dynamics of liquid flow in an upflow reactor used for anaerobic treatment of wastewater. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 20(10), (1978), pp.1577-1594.

DOI: 10.1002/bit.260201007

Google Scholar

[4] G. Lettinga, R. Roersma, and P. Grin. Anaerobic treatment of raw domestic sewage at ambient temperatures using a granular bed UASB reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 25(7), (1983), pp.1701-1723.

DOI: 10.1002/bit.260250703

Google Scholar

[5] G. Lettinga, A.F. H van Nelsen, S. W, Hobma, W. W, De Zeeu, and A. Klapwijk. Use of the upflow sludge (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 22(4), (1980).

DOI: 10.1002/bit.260220402

Google Scholar

[6] E. Nolde. Greywater reuse systems for toilet flushing in multi-storey building-over ten years experience in Berlin. Urban Water 1: 275¨C284 (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s1462-0758(00)00023-6

Google Scholar

[7] B. Jefferson, , A.L., Laine, S. J, Judd, and T. Stephenson. Membrane bioreactors and their role in wastewater reuse. Water Sci. Tech. 41(1): (2000), pp.197-204.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2000.0029

Google Scholar

[8] B. Jefferson, A. Laine, S. Parsons, T. Stephenson, and S Judd. Technologies for domestic wastewater recycling. Urban Water 1: (1999), p.285–292.

DOI: 10.1016/s1462-0758(00)00030-3

Google Scholar

[9] R. Otterpohl, U. Braun, M. Oldenburg. Innovative technologies for decentralised water, wastewater and biowaste management in urban and peri-urban areas. Water Sci. Technol. 48(11/12): (2003), pp.23-32.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0795

Google Scholar

[10] CJT 221, Determination method for municipal sludge in wastewater treatment plant[S] (2005).

Google Scholar

[11] APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed. WashingtonDC, Amer Public Health Assoc, (1999).

Google Scholar

[12] L. Zhang L, C. Wei, K. Zhang, C. Zhang, Q. Fang, and S. Li. Effects of temperature on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification via nitrite in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 32: (2009) pp.175-182.

DOI: 10.1007/s00449-008-0235-3

Google Scholar