Flexural Performance of Polyurethane/Multi Walled Carbon Nanotubes Foam Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Polyurethane (PU)/multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) foam composites were produced by reaction of based palm oil polyol (POP) with methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI). The MWCNTs were added into PU foam with the percentages varied from 0 wt.% to 3 wt.%. Sandwich composites were prepared using hand lay-up method where Aluminium (Al) sheet as skin were stacked onto PU foam using Araldite adhesives. The PU/MWCNTs foam composites (PMFC) and PU/MWCNTs foam sandwich composites (PMFSC) were characterized using flexural test analysis. Observation showed higher value of flexural strength for PMFC and PMFSC at 0.5% incorporation of MWCNTs. The flexural strength of sandwich PU foam is higher with an average value of 159.38% than control PU foam, due to Al sheet act as ductile skin and prevents samples from rupture rapidly. The modeling using finite element analysis (NX Software-version 8.5) showed the displacement nodal magnitude for 0.5% PMFC (2.537 mm) are higher than 0.5% PMFSC (0.288 mm).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

8-12

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

[1] A.A. Beltran and L.A. Boyaca : Latin America Applied Research (2011), pp.75-80.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Mirzapour, M.H. Beheshty and M. Vafayan : Iranian Polymer Journal 14(12) (2005), pp.1082-1088.

Google Scholar

[3] S.B. Basturk and M. Tanoglu : Usak University Journal of Material Sciences 1 (2012), pp.59-70.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Marsavina, D.M. Constantinescu, E. Linul, T. Voiconi, D.A. Apostol and T. Sadowski : 13th International Conference on Fracture (2013), pp.1-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.12.006

Google Scholar

[5] H. Jin, W.Y. Lu, S. Scheffel, T.D. Hinnerichs and M.K. Neilsen : International Journal of Solids and Structures 44 (2007), pp.6930-6944.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.03.018

Google Scholar

[6] R. Tanaka, S. Hirose and H. Hatakeyama : Bioresource Technology 99 (2008), pp.3810-3816.

Google Scholar

[7] R. Maharsia, N. Gupta and H.D. Jerro : Materials Science and Engineering A 417 (2006), pp.249-258.

Google Scholar

[8] K.S. Yen, M.M. Ratnam and H.M. Akil : Polymer Testing 29 (2010), pp.358-368.

Google Scholar

[9] C.Y. Tan, H.M. Akil : Composites : Part B 43 (2012), pp.1433-1438.

Google Scholar

[10] M.A. Azmi, M.F.C. Yusoff, H.Z. Abdullah and M.I. Idris : International Journal of Integrated Engineering Vol. 4 No. 1 (2012), pp.11-15.

Google Scholar

[11] F. Zainuddin, S. Ahmad, R. Rasid and S.N.F.S. Adam : Advanced Materials Research Vol. 795 (2013), pp.526-529.

Google Scholar