Empirical Analysis on the Influence of Different Land Use on Soil Organic Matter

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, we take secondary forest, orchard, and woodland soils of rubber in different planting years as a research subject and analyze the influence of different land use on soil organic matter. The results show that land use has significant influence on soil organic matter components (p <0.01). We conducted a survey and sampling on 10 age classes of Hainan Dongfang Daguangba (3, 8, 13, 18,23,29,33,35,38,42 years old) rubber plantation plots soil layer (0 cm-20 cm, 20 cm-40 cm), and conducted in-house testing analysis of its organic matter content, and achieved preliminary exploration that soil organic matter content of different land use patterns in Dongfang City in Hainan: secondary forest> orchard> rubber plantation. These differences are mainly due to the litter under different tillage quantity, quality and variety of management measures. While orchards and rubber plantation have used different tillage method, as a plantation by human, it was greatly influenced by human.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

127-131

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

[1] Junjian Li & Xi Zhao & Tianhao Pan. Influences of Different Land Uses on Soil Labile Organic Matter . Soil and Water Conservation, 2011, 25 (1): 147-151.

Google Scholar

[2] Yuanrun Zhang & Liguo Dong & Jinjun Cai. Research on Characteristics of Soil Properties of Different Land Use in Semiarid Mountain . Soil and Water Conservation, 2009, 29 (5): 66-68.

Google Scholar

[3] Jiehong Wang & Xianwen Li & Xuezheng Shi. Relationship between the Distribution of Soil Nutrients and Soil Particle Composition in different land use patterns . Soil and Water Conservation, 2003, 17 (2): 44-50.

Google Scholar

[4] IQBAL J, RONGGUI H, LIJUN D, et al. Difference in soil CO2 fluxbetween different land use types in mid-subtropical China. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40: 2324-2333.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.010

Google Scholar