Simulation Analysis on the Problem of Opening Main Parachute Used in UAV Recovery System

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper introduces simulation model of a certain kind UAVs recovery procedure by using Matlab/Simulink software. The problem of time point to open main parachute (tm) in this UAV Recovery System is analyzed by simulation results of this model, and a series of meaningful conclusion is drawn. When recovery system works while UAV is flying steadily, tm becomes earlier as velocity increases, and later as pitch angle increases. tm is earliest when relieve drag parachute reefing at the time when control subsystem stops working. Larger the drag characteristics of the fully opened drag parachute is, earlier tm is, and larger the drag characteristics of the reefing opened drag parachute is, later tm is. These results are benefit for UAV recovery system design of this kind.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

57-61

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

[1] J. W. Leonard, M. L. Accorsi, C. H. S. Jenkins. New Structural Model for Parachute Inflation Simulations. ADA370098. (1999).

DOI: 10.21236/ada370098

Google Scholar

[2] M. L. Accorsi, J. W. Leonard, T. E. Tezduyar. Simulation and Modeling of Wind Effects on Airdrop Systems. ADA398317. (2002).

DOI: 10.21236/ada398317

Google Scholar

[3] Keith Stein, Tayfun Tezduyar, Richard Benney. Computational Methods for Modeling Parachute Syetems. 2003. 39-46.

Google Scholar

[4] Zhenlong Xu, Michael Accorsi, John Leonard. Simulation of Dynamic Contact Problems in Parachute Systems. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication. Vol. 1, 2004. 288-306.

DOI: 10.2514/1.7787

Google Scholar

[5] Benjamin A. Tutt, Anthony P. Taylor. The Use of LS-DYNA to Simulate the Inflation of a Parachute Canopy. 2005. AIAA 2005-1608.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-1608

Google Scholar

[6] J. Stephen Lingard, Matthew G. Darley. Simulation of Parachute Fluid Structure Interaction in Supersonic Flow. 2005. AIAA 2005-1607.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2005-1607

Google Scholar

[7] Vladimir S. Drozd. Axisymmetric parachute Shape Study. 2009. AIAA 2009-2944.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Sadraey, R. Colgren. Robust Nonlinear Controller Design for a Complete UAV Mission. AIAA 2006-6687, (2006).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-6687

Google Scholar

[9] Denison, Nicholas A. Automated Carrier Landing of an Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle Using Dynamic Inversion. ADA469901. (2007).

Google Scholar

[10] Papageorgiou, Evangelos C. Development of a Dynamic Model for a UAV. ADA331969. (1997).

Google Scholar

[11] Weissenfels, Robert D. Full Nonlinear Simulation of Helicopter Coupled Rotor-Fuselage Motion Using MATLAB Symbolic Processor and Dynamic Simulation. ADA377881. (2000).

Google Scholar

[12] Karpel, Moti. Increased Order Modeling Approach to Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity. ADA530869. (2010).

Google Scholar

[13] Du Kunming, Teng Haishan, Dynamic Modeling and Simulation on UAV's Recovery Process with Forepart Located Parachute, Spacecraft Recovery & Remote Sensing, Beijing China, No. 3 Vol. 32, (2011).

Google Scholar