An Empirical Analysis of Developer Collaboration Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

To further verify the uses of bipartite network theory and understand the intrinsic nature in social collaboration network. In this paper, we get the information of open source software projects from Source-Forge web and construct a project management collaboration network by analyzing the data of project and manager. Then, through the ordinary projection two kinds of one-mode network are made and the degree distribution of one-mode network and origin bipartite networks shows a power-law like. Finally we evaluate the node's importance on manager network to acquire the core nodes, namely domain experts, by using the metric of node degree, between and topological potential respectively, and provide some helpful applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2177-2181

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

[1] Morris S A, Yen G G. Construction of bipartite and unipartite weighted networks from collections of journal papers (2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Newman M E J. Scientific collaboration networks. I. network construction and fundamental results Physical Review E, (2001).

Google Scholar

[3] Newman M E J. Scientific collaboration networks. II. shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality Physical Review E, ( 2001).

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.64.016132

Google Scholar

[4] Watts D J , Strogatz. S.H. Collective dynamics of small world networks Nature, Patent 6, 393, 356. (1998).

Google Scholar

[5] Barabasi A. L, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks Science, (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] Hernan, Gan WenYan, LiDeYi, etc. A small actor cooperation network topology analysis journal of complex system with complex sexual science, (2006 ).

Google Scholar

[7] LiuAiFen, FuChunHua, ZhangZengPing, etc. China film network of empirical statistical study [J]. J complex systems and complexity science, Patent 12, 393, 356 (2007).

Google Scholar

[8] Lambiotte R, AusloosM. Uncovering collective listening habits and music genres in bipartite networks Physical Review E, (2005).

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.72.066107

Google Scholar

[9] Xu Linhua, Jian-Feng Guo, Zhu Jianyang library book lending system with single scale binary network model Intelligence Journal, (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] WangJinLiang, zhangpeng, DiZeng Beijing normal university library system network analysis Journal of intelligence, (2009).

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http: /zh. wikipedia. org.

Google Scholar

[12] Latapy M, Magnien C, Vecchio N D. Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks Social Networks, ( 2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.006

Google Scholar

[13] Altmann M.Reinterpreting Network Measures for Models of Disease Transmission Social Networks Vol. 83-87(1993) p.119.

Google Scholar

[14] Poulin R, Boily. M C, Masse B R.Dynamical Systems to Define Centrality in Social Networks Social Networks, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-8733(00)00020-4

Google Scholar

[15] XuLing, HuHaiBo, wasserman s. and Faust k, etc. A Chinese scientists cooperation network of empirical analysis journal of complex systems and complexity science, (2009).

Google Scholar

[16] XiaoLiPing, MengHui, LiDeYi, etc. Based on the topological potential network node importance ranking and evaluation method. (2008).

Google Scholar

[17] LiDeyi. ArtificialIntelligencewith Uncertainty. New York: CRC Press, (2007).

Google Scholar