Applying the Precautionary Principle in the Risk Management of Invasive Species via Ballast Water

Article Preview

Abstract:

In marine and coastal environments, commercial shipping ballast water is considered to be the most relevant transfer vector of invasions world wide. There are many uncertainties in the management of invasive species. Consideration of the uncertainties is crucial for the determination of the most appropriate management strategies to address this highly variable problem. The traditional risk management has many limitations by administrative complexness and important uncertainties. In order to make risk management more effective, this paper discuss that how to apply the precautionary principle in the risk management of invasive species.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2167-2171

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

[1] Nicholas Bax, Angela Williamson, Max Aguero, et al. Marine invasive alien species: a threat to global biodiversity,. Marine Policy, 27(2003), pp.313-323.

DOI: 10.1016/s0308-597x(03)00041-1

Google Scholar

[2] Sala, O.E., et al. Global biodiversity scenarions for the year 2100, Science. 287(2000), pp.1770-1774.

Google Scholar

[3] Lockwood, J. L., M.L. Mckinney. Biotic Homogenization. Dordrecht: The Netherlans: Kluwer, (2001).

Google Scholar

[4] Endresen, Oyvind, et al. Marine pollution bulletin. 48(2004), pp.615-623.

Google Scholar

[5] Joel A. Tickner, Ken Geiser. the precautionary principle stimulus for solutions- and alternatives- based environmental policy,. Environmental impact assessment review. 24 (2004) pp.801-824.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2004.06.007

Google Scholar

[6] Bishop WE. Risk assessment vs. the precautionary principle: is it really either/or? Risk Policy Rep 2000; 7(3), pp.35-38.

Google Scholar

[7] Rogers MD. The precautionary principle, a view from Europe. Risk Policy Rep 2000; 7(3), pp.41-43.

Google Scholar

[8] Jones PBC. Implementing the precautionary principle. Science, technology and innovation update. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University, (2001).

Google Scholar

[9] Kirschenmann F. Can we say yes' (to agriculture) using the precautionary principle (one farmer, s perspective). Wingspread conference on the precautionary principle, Racine, Wisconsin. (1998).

Google Scholar

[10] Verling, Emma, et al. supply-slide Invaion Ecology: Characterizing Propagule pressure in coastal ecosystems., Proceeding of the royal society B 272(2005), pp.1249-1257.

DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3090

Google Scholar

[11] Jordan A, O' Riordan T. The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental policies and politics. In: Raffensperger C, Tickner JA, editors. Protecting public health and the environment, implementing the precautionary principle. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press, 1999, p.385.

DOI: 10.2307/3343463

Google Scholar

[12] B.S. Galil. Marine Pollution Bulletin 55( 2007) 314-322.

Google Scholar

[13] Firestone, JM, and JJ Corbett. Ocean Development & International Law. 36(2005), pp.291-316.

Google Scholar

[14] Simberloff, D. BioScience. 54(2004) 247-254.

Google Scholar

[15] Pitois , Sophie G., and Clive J. Fox. "long-term changes in zooplankton biomass concentration and mean size over the nnorthwest European shelf inferred from continuous plankton recorder data. ICES Journal of Marine Sciences 63(2006), pp.785-798.

DOI: 10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.03.009

Google Scholar