Studies of the Origins of Half Loop Arrays and Interfacial Dislocations Observed in Homoepitaxial Layers of 4H-SiC

Article Preview

Abstract:

Dislocation behavior during homo-epitaxy of 4H-SiC on offcut substrates by Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) has been studied using Synchrotron X-ray Topography and KOH etching. Studies carried out before and after epilayer growth have revealed that, in some cases, short, edge oriented segments of basal plane dislocation (BPD) inside the substrate can be drawn towards the interface producing screw oriented segments intersecting the growth surface. In other cases, BPD half-loops attached to the substrate surface are forced to glide into the epilayer producing similar screw oriented surface intersections. It is shown that the initial motion of the short edge oriented BPD segments that are drawn from the substrate into the epilayer is caused by thermal stress resulting from radial temperature gradients experienced by the wafer whilst in the epi-chamber. This same stress also causes the initial glide of the surface half-loop into the epilayer and through the advancing epilayer surface. These mobile BPD segments provide screw oriented segments that pierce the advancing epilayer surface that initially replicate as the crystal grows. Once critical thickness is reached, according to the Mathews-Blakeslee model, these screw segments glide sideways under the action of the mismatch stress leaving IDs and HLAs in their wake.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 821-823)

Pages:

319-322

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Matthews and A. Blakeslee, Journal of Crystal Growth 27, 118 (1974).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Goldberg, M. Levinshtein, and S. Rumyantsev, Silicon carbide, in Properties of Advanced Semiconductor Materials: GaN, AlN, InN, BN, SiC, SiGe, edited by M. Levinshtein, S. Rumyantsev, and M. Shur (John Wiley & Sons, New York, (2001) 93–148.

DOI: 10.1142/2046

Google Scholar

[3] G. A. Slack, J. Appl. Phys. 35, 3460 (1964).

Google Scholar

[4] A. Galeckas, J. Linnros and P. Pirouz, Appl. Phys. Letts., 81, 883, (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] H. Jacobson, J. Birch, C. Hallin, A. Henry, R. Yakimova, T. Tuomi, E. Janzen, and U. Lindefelt, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 3689 (2003).

DOI: 10.1063/1.1579120

Google Scholar

[6] X. Zhang, M. Skowonski, K. X. Liu, R. E. Stahlbush, J. J. Sumakeris, M. J. Paisley and M. J. O'Loughlin, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 093520 (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] H. Wang, F. Wu, M. Dudley, B. Raghothamachar, G. Chung, J. Zhang, B. Thomas, E. K. Sanchez, S. G. Mueller, D. M. Hansen, M. J. Loboda, Mater. Sci. Forum, 778-780, 328 (2014).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.778-780.328

Google Scholar

[8] S. Ha, H. J. Chung, N. T. Nuhfer, and M. Skowronski, J. Cryst. Growth 262, 130 (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] N. Zhang, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, M. Dudley, and R. E. Stahlbush, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 122108 (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Sasaki, J. Suda and T. Kimoto, Mater. Sci. Forum, Vols. 717-720 (2012) 481-484.

Google Scholar

[11] J.W. Matthews, A.E. Blakeslee, J. Cryst. Growth 27, 118 (1974).

Google Scholar

[12] X. Zhang, T. Miyazawa, and H. Tsuchida, Materials Science Forum 717-720, 313 (2012).

Google Scholar