Effect of Different Types of Coarse Aggregates on Strength of Concrete

Article Preview

Abstract:

Different types of coarse aggregates have distinguished petrological, petrographical and mineralogical and local characteristics, thus, their effects on concrete strength development are quite significant, various and unpredictable. So, the laboratory investigation on the concrete mixtures using local aggregates becomes very necessary before used in engineering practice. This paper carried out the evaluation of two types of coarse aggregates constantly used in Florida, including Miami Oolite limestone and Georgia granite, on their effects on the developments of compressive strength, splitting tensile strength and elastic modulus of concrete with time. And the prediction models based on ACI and Cario-Lew are evaluated and modified. The investigation results indicate that the concrete mixtures with Georgia granite aggregate tends to develop lower strength than those with Miami Oolite aggregate. And the modified models give better prediction on strength development of the concrete mixtures with aggregates often used in Florida.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

614-623

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

[1] Aitcin, P-C. and Mehta, P. K. 1990. Effect of coarse aggregate characteristics on mechanical properties of high strength concrete. ACI Materials Journal, Mar-Apr 1990, Vol. 87, No. 2, pp.103-107.

DOI: 10.14359/1882

Google Scholar

[2] Sarkar, S. L. and Aitcin, P-C, 1990. Importance of petrological, petrographical and mineralogical characteristics of aggregates in very high strength concrete. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1990, No. 1061, pp.129-144.

DOI: 10.1520/stp23457s

Google Scholar

[3] Alexander, M. G.and Addis, B. J., 1992. Properties of High Strength Concrete Influenced by Aggregates and Interfacial Bond. Bond in Concrete: From Research to Practice. Proceedings of the CEB International Conference held at Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia, Oct. 15-17, Vol.2, Topics 3-7, pp.4-19 to 4-26.

Google Scholar

[4] Giaccio, G., Rocco, C., Violini, D., Zappitelli, J., and Zerbino, R., 1992. High strength concrete incorporating different coarse aggregates. ACI Materials Journal, May-Jun 1992, Vol. 89, No. 3, pp.242-246.

DOI: 10.14359/2568

Google Scholar

[5] ACI 318-08, 2008. Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, November 2008.

Google Scholar

[6] Branson, D.E.; Meyers, B.L.; and Kripanarayanan, K.M, 1970. Loss of Prestress, Camber, and Deflection of Noncomposite and Composite Structures Using Different Weight Concretes. Final Report No. 70-6, Iowa Highway Commission, Aug. 1970, Pp 1-229.

DOI: 10.15554/pcij.09011971.22.52

Google Scholar

[7] Carino, N.J., and H.S. Lew, 1982. Re-examination of the Relation between Splitting Tensile and Compressive Strength of Normal Weight Concrete. Journal of American Concrete Institute, Vol.79, No.3, May-June 1982, pp.214-219

DOI: 10.14359/10900

Google Scholar