Unconstrained 2D and 3D Magnetotelluric Inversion - Detection of a Ni-Cu-PGE Ore Zone and Carbonaceous Phyllites - Kevitsa

References

1. Berdichevsky, M.N. and Dmitriev, V.I.
   [2008] Models and methods of Magnetotellurics. Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
2. deGroot-Hedlin, C. and Constable, S.
   [1990] Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data. Geophysics, 55(12), 1613–1624.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Egbert, G.D. and Kelbert, A.
   [2012] Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems. Geophysical Journal International, 189(1), 251–267.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Howe, B.D., Townsend, J., Doerner, B. and Patraskovic, P.
   [2014] Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion and petrophysical interpretation of the Turquoise Ridge gold deposit, Nevada, USA. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014, 1730–1735.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Koivisto, E., Malehmir, A., Heikkinen, P., Heinonen, S. and Kukkonen, I.
   [2012] 2D reflection seismic investigations at the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, northern Finland. Geophysics, 77.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Le, C.V.A., Harris, B.D. and Pethick, A.M.
   [2016] Magnetotelluric inversion, carbonaceous phyllites and an ore zone: Kevitsa; Finland. ASEG-PESA 2016, Adelaide, Australia. (in review)
   [Google Scholar]
7. Maier, W.D., Lahtinen, R. and O’Brien, H.
   [2015] Mineral deposits of Finland. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Malehmir, A., Juhlin, C., Wijns, C., Urosevic, M., Valasti, P. and Koivisto, E.
   [2012] 3D reflection seismic imaging for open-pit mine planning and deep exploration in the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, northern Finland. Geophysics, 77.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Simpson, F. and Bahr, K.
   [2005] Practical Magnetotellurics. Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Siripunvaraporn, W. and Egbert, G.
    [2000] An efficient data-subspace inversion method for 2-D magnetotelluric data. Geophysics, 65(3), 791–803.
    [Google Scholar]